Examination of geostatistical and machine-learning techniques as interpolators in anisotropic atmospheric environments

Araújo, 2007, Ensemble forecasting of species distributions, Trends Ecol. Evol., 22, 42, 10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010

Arshinov, 2009, Spatial and temporal variability of CO2 and CH4 concentrations in the surface atmospheric layer over West Siberia, Atmos. Ocean. Opt., 22, 84, 10.1134/S1024856009010126

Biraud, 2013, A multi-year record of airborne CO2 observations in the U.S. Southern Great Plains, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 751, 10.5194/amt-6-751-2013

Cambaliza, 2014, Assessment of uncertainties of an aircraft-based mass balance approach for quantifying urban greenhouse gas emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9029, 10.5194/acp-14-9029-2014

Collins, 1996, A comparison of spatial interpolation techniques in temperature estimation

Goswami, 2007, Real-time flow forecasting in the absence of quantitative precipitation forecasts: a multi-model approach, J. Hydrol., 334, 125, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.10.002

Gringarten, 2001, Teacher's aide: variogram interpretation and modeling, Math. Geol., 33, 507, 10.1023/A:1011093014141

Ilić, 2000, Force learn algorithm – training neural networks with patterns which have highest errors, 46

Laiti, 2013, Residual kriging analysis of airborne measurements: application to the mapping of atmospheric boundary-layer thermal structures in a mountain valley, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 14, 79, 10.1002/asl2.420

Laiti, 2013, Atmospheric boundary layer structures associated with the Ora del Garda wind in the Alps as revealed from airborne and surface measurements, Atmos. Res., 132–133, 473, 10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.07.006

Laslett, 1994, Kriging and splines: an empirical comparison of their predictive performance in some applications, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 89, 391, 10.1080/01621459.1994.10476759

Li, 2011, Application of machine learning methods to spatial interpolation of environmental variables, Environ. Model. Softw., 26, 1647, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.07.004

Li, 2011, A review of comparative studies of spatial interpolation methods in environmental sciences: performance and impact factors, Ecol. Inf., 6, 228, 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.12.003

Li, 2014, Spatial interpolation methods applied in the environmental sciences: a review, Environ. Model. Softw., 53, 173, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.008

Marmion, 2009, Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modelling, Divers. Distrib., 15, 59, 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00491.x

Mays, 2009, Aircraft-based measurements of the carbon footprint of Indianapolis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 7316, 10.1021/es901326b

Merwin, 2002, Artificial neural networks as a method of spatial interpolation for digital elevation models, Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 29, 99, 10.1559/152304002782053323

Myers, 1991, Interpolation and estimation with spatially located data, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., 11, 209, 10.1016/0169-7439(91)85001-6

Neuman, 1984, Analysis of nonintrinsic spatial variability by residual kriging with applications to regional groundwater levels, Math. Geol., 16, 499, 10.1007/BF01886329

Öztopal, 2006, Artificial neural network approach to spatial estimation of wind velocity data, Energy Convers. Manag., 47, 395, 10.1016/j.enconman.2005.05.009

Pope, 2013, Characterizing air pollution patterns on multiple time scales in urban areas: a landscape ecological approach, Urban Ecosyst., 1

Rigol, 2001, Artificial neural networks as a tool for spatial interpolation, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 15, 323, 10.1080/13658810110038951

Stahl, 2006, Comparison of approaches for spatial interpolation of daily air temperature in a large region with complex topography and highly variable station density, Agric. For. Meteorol., 139, 224, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.07.004

Tanaka, 2012, Aircraft measurements of carbon dioxide and methane for the calibration of ground-based high-resolution Fourier Transform Spectrometers and a comparison to GOSAT data measured over Tsukuba and Moshiri, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 2003, 10.5194/amt-5-2003-2012

Zimmerman, 1999, An experimental comparison of ordinary and universal kriging and inverse distance weighting, Math. Geol., 31, 375, 10.1023/A:1007586507433