UQpy: A general purpose Python package and development environment for uncertainty quantification

Journal of Computational Science - Tập 47 - Trang 101204 - 2020
Audrey Olivier1, Dimitris G. Giovanis1, B.S. Aakash1, Mohit Chauhan1, Lohit Vandanapu1, Michael D. Shields1
1Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States

Tài liệu tham khảo

Sudret, 2008, Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 93, 964, 10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.002

Sudret, 2012, Meta-models for structural reliability and uncertainty quantification, 1

Nikishova, 2019, Semi-intrusive uncertainty propagation for multiscale models, J. Comput. Sci., 35, 80, 10.1016/j.jocs.2019.06.007

Sturdy, 2019, Uncertainty quantification of computational coronary stenosis assessment and model based mitigation of image resolution limitations, J. Comput. Sci., 31, 137, 10.1016/j.jocs.2019.01.004

Archibald, 2014, Characterizing the elements of earth's radiative budget: applying uncertainty quantification to the CESM, J. Comput. Sci., 5, 85, 10.1016/j.jocs.2013.03.001

Tartakovsky, 2013, Assessment and management of risk in subsurface hydrology: a review and perspective, Adv. Water Resour., 51, 247, 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.04.007

Vrugt, 2013, Treatment of input uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: doing hydrology backward with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation, Adv. Water Resour., 51, 247

Linde, 2017, On uncertainty quantification in hydrogeology and hydrogeophysics, Adv. Water Resour., 110, 166, 10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.10.014

Rafiei Emam, 2018, Uncertainty analysis of hydrological modeling in a tropical area using different algorithms, Front. Earth Sci., 12, 661, 10.1007/s11707-018-0695-y

Shields Uncertainty Research Group, UQpy – uncertainty quantification with python. https://github.com/SURGroup/UQpy. (Accessed 24 July 2020).

Shields Uncertainty Research Group, Jupyter example scripts, supplementary materials to UQpy manuscript. https://github.com/SURGroup/UQpy_paper. (Accessed 24 July 2020).

Schuëller, 2006, Computational stochastic structural analysis (COSSAN) – a software tool, Struct. Saf., 28, 68, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2005.03.005

Marelli, 2014, UQLab: a framework for uncertainty quantification in Matlab, 2554

Software – Engineering Risk Analysis Group – Technical University of Munich. https://www.bgu.tum.de/era/software/. (Accessed 11 June 2020).

Gorissen, 2010, A surrogate modeling and adaptive sampling toolbox for computer based design, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 11, 2051

Bourinet, 2009, A review of recent features and improvements added to FERUM software, Proc. of the 10th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR’09)

Dupuy, 2015, DiceDesign and DiceEval: two R packages for design and analysis of computer experiments, J. Stat. Softw., 65, 1, 10.18637/jss.v065.i11

Roustant, 2012, DiceKriging, DiceOptim: two R packages for the analysis of computer experiments by kriging-based metamodeling and optimization, J. Stat. Softw., 51, 1, 10.18637/jss.v051.i01

Walter, 2014

Iooss, 2015

Adams, 2009

Debusschere, 2016, Uncertainty quantification toolkit (UQTk), 1

Baudin, 2017, OpenTURNS: an industrial software for uncertainty quantification in simulation, 2001

Thacker, 2006, Probabilistic engineering analysis using the NESSUS software, Struct. Saf., 28, 83, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2004.11.003

Tennøe, 2018, Uncertainpy: a python toolbox for uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis in computational neuroscience, Front. Neuroinform., 12, 49, 10.3389/fninf.2018.00049

Puzyrev, 2019, pyROM: a computational framework for reduced order modeling, J. Comput. Sci., 30, 157, 10.1016/j.jocs.2018.12.004

Feinberg, 2015, Chaospy: an open source tool for designing methods of uncertainty quantification, J. Comput. Sci., 11, 46, 10.1016/j.jocs.2015.08.008

Sukys, 2018, 159

Dutta, 2020

Martin, 2020

Wang, 2016, A GUI platform for uncertainty quantification of complex dynamical models, Environ. Model. Softw., 76, 1, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.11.004

Shields Uncertainty Research Group, Johns Hopkins University, UQpy Documentation. https://uqpyproject.readthedocs.io/. (Accessed 11 June 2020).

Cimrman, 2019, Multiscale finite element calculations in Python using SfePy, Adv. Comput. Math., 10.1007/s10444-019-09666-0

Tange, 2018

Ismail, 2009, The hysteresis Bouc-Wen model, a survey, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 16, 161, 10.1007/s11831-009-9031-8

Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data, 2017

ABAQUS, 2019

Gillie, 2009, Analysis of heated structures: nature and modelling benchmarks, Fire Saf. J., 44, 673, 10.1016/j.firesaf.2009.01.003

CEN, 2002

CEN, 2012

McKay, 1979, Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, Technometrics, 21, 239

Shields, 2016, The generalization of Latin hypercube sampling, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 148, 96, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.12.002

Shields, 2015, Refined stratified sampling for efficient Monte Carlo based uncertainty quantification, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 142, 310, 10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.023

Shields, 2018, Adaptive Monte Carlo analysis for strongly nonlinear stochastic systems, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 175, 207, 10.1016/j.ress.2018.03.018

Smith, 2014

Gelman, 2013

Au, 2001, Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation, Probab. Eng. Mech., 16, 263, 10.1016/S0266-8920(01)00019-4

Haario, 2006, DRAM: efficient adaptive MCMC, Stat. Comput., 16, 339, 10.1007/s11222-006-9438-0

Vrugt, 2009, Accelerating Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation by differential evolution with self-adaptive randomized subspace sampling, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 10, 273, 10.1515/IJNSNS.2009.10.3.273

Vrugt, 2016, Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation using the DREAM software package: theory, concepts, and MATLAB implementation, Environ. Model. Softw., 75, 273, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.08.013

Goodman, 2010, Ensemble samplers with affine invariance, Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 5, 65, 10.2140/camcos.2010.5.65

Foreman-Mackey, 2013, emcee: The MCMC Hammer, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac., 125, 306, 10.1086/670067

Shinozuka, 1972, Digital simulation of random processes and its applications, J. Sound Vib., 25, 111, 10.1016/0022-460X(72)90600-1

Shinozuka, 1991, Simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation, Appl. Mech. Rev., 44, 191, 10.1115/1.3119501

Phoon, 2002, Simulation of second-order processes using Karhunen-Loeve expansion, Comput. Struct., 80, 1049, 10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00064-0

Betz, 2014, Numerical methods for the discretization of random fields by means of the Karhunen-Loève expansion, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 271, 109, 10.1016/j.cma.2013.12.010

Grigoriu, 1995

Shields, 2011, A simple and efficient methodology to approximate a general non-Gaussian stationary stochastic process by a translation process, Probab. Eng. Mech., 26, 511, 10.1016/j.probengmech.2011.04.003

Shields, 2017, Simulation of higher-order stochastic processes by spectral representation, Probab. Eng. Mech., 47, 1, 10.1016/j.probengmech.2016.11.001

Benowitz, 2015, Simulation of wind velocities on long span structures: a novel stochastic wave based model, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 147, 154, 10.1016/j.jweia.2015.10.004

Beck, 2004, Model selection using response measurements: Bayesian probabilistic approach, J. Eng. Mech., 130, 192, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:2(192)

Raftery, 1995, Bayesian model selection in social research, Sociol. Methodol., 25, 111, 10.2307/271063

Akaike, 1974, A new look at the statistical model identification, 215

Hurvich, 1989, Regression and time series model selection in small samples, Biometrika, 76, 297, 10.1093/biomet/76.2.297

Hurvich, 1995, Model selection for extended quasi-likelihood models in small samples, Biometrics, 1077, 10.2307/2533006

Raftery, 2007, Estimating the integrated likelihood via posterior simulation using the harmonic mean identity, Bayesian Stat., 8, 1

Cornell, 1969, A probability-based structural code, J. ACI, 66, 974

Ditlevsen, 1973

Hasofer, 1974, An exact and invariant first-order reliability format, J. Eng. Mech., 100, 111

Ditlevsen, 1982, Model uncertainty in structural reliability, Struct. Saf., 1, 73, 10.1016/0167-4730(82)90016-9

Breitung, 1989, Asymptotic approximations for probability integrals, Probab. Eng. Mech., 4, 187, 10.1016/0266-8920(89)90024-6

Rackwitz, 1978, Structural reliability under combined load sequences, Comput. Struct., 9, 489, 10.1016/0045-7949(78)90046-9

Papaioannou, 2015, MCMC algorithms for subset simulation, Probab. Eng. Mech., 41, 89, 10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.06.006

Shields, 2020, Subset simulation for problems with strongly non-Gaussian, highly anisotropic, and degenerate distributions, Comput. Struct.

Grigoriu, 2009, Reduced order models for random functions. Application to stochastic problems, Appl. Math. Model., 33, 161, 10.1016/j.apm.2007.10.023

Santner, 2003

Echard, 2011, AK-MCS: an active learning reliability method combining kriging and monte carlo simulation, Struct. Saf., 33, 145, 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.01.002

Sundar, 2019, Reliability analysis using adaptive kriging surrogates with multimodel inference, ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. A: Civ. Eng., 5, 04019004, 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001005

Bichon, 2008, Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions, AIAA J., 46, 2459, 10.2514/1.34321

Jones, 1998, Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions, J. Glob. Optim., 13, 455, 10.1023/A:1008306431147

Lam, 2008

Lebrun, 2009, An innovating analysis of the Nataf transformation from the copula viewpoint, Probab. Eng. Mech., 24, 312, 10.1016/j.probengmech.2008.08.001

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Computational Science

Tập 47

101204

Thông tin tác giả