Policy design and technological substitution: Investigating the REACH regulation in an agent-based model

Ecological Economics - Tập 107 - Trang 347-365 - 2014
Nabila Arfaoui1, Eric Brouillat2, Maïder Saint Jean2
1GREDEG, University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, 250 rue Albert Einstein, 06560 Valbonne, France
2GREThA, University of Bordeaux, Avenue Leon Duguit, 33608 Pessac, France

Tài liệu tham khảo

ADEME Alcimed, 2007

Béal, 2013, Les effets d'une réglementation sur la concurrence et l'innovation: première analyse de la réglementation européenne REACH, Econ. Prévision, 197–198, 63, 10.3917/ecop.197.0063

Berkhout, 2003

Bewa, 2012, Le contexte: reconversion de la chimie vers la chimie verte, OCL, 19, 1, 10.1051/ocl.2012.0424

Chiaromonte, 1993, Heterogeneity, competition and macroeconomic dynamics, Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn., 4, 39, 10.1016/0954-349X(93)90004-4

CSES, 2012, Interim evaluation: impact of the REACH regulation on the innovativeness of the EU chemical industry

EEA, 2011

European Commission, 2013, General report on REACH

Eurostat, 2009, The REACH baseline study

Faber, 2010, Exploring domestic micro-cogeneration in the Netherlands: an agent-based demand model for technology diffusion, Energy Policy, 38, 2763, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.008

Fuchs, 2011, REACH: a new paradigm for the management of chemical risks

Hahn, 1989, Economic prescriptions for environmental problems: how the patient followed the doctor's orders, J. Econ. Perspect., 3, 95, 10.1257/jep.3.2.95

INERIS, 2005, Dichlorométhane

IRSST, 2010, La substitution des solvants par les esters méthyliques d'acides gras d'huiles végétales

Jaffe, 1997, Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study, Rev. Econ. Stat., 79, 610, 10.1162/003465397557196

Jänicke, 2010, Governing environmental innovations, Environ. Polit., 19, 127, 10.1080/09644010903396150

2007

Johnstone, 2012, Environmental policy stringency and technological innovation: evidence from survey data and patent counts, Appl. Econ., 44, 2157, 10.1080/00036846.2011.560110

Lanjouw, 1996, Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology, Res. Policy, 25, 549, 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00853-5

Leibenstein, 1950, Bandwagon, snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers' demand, Q. J. Econ., 64, 183, 10.2307/1882692

Malerba, 1999, “History-friendly” models of industry evolution: the computer industry, Ind. Corp. Chang., 8, 3, 10.1093/icc/8.1.3

MEI Report, 2007

Nelson, 1982

Nordbeck, 2003, European chemicals regulation and its effect on innovation: an assessment of the EU's white paper on the strategy for a future chemicals policy, Eur. Environ., 13, 79, 10.1002/eet.313

OECD, 2007, Impacts of environmental policy instruments on technological change

Pearce, 1990

Porter, 1995, Toward a new conception of the environment — Competitiveness relationship, J. Econ. Perspect., 9, 97, 10.1257/jep.9.4.97

2005

Schwarz, 2009, Agent-based modeling of the diffusion of environmental innovations — An empirical approach, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 76, 497, 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.024

Schwoon, 2006, Stimulating the adoption of fuel cell vehicles, J. Evol. Econ., 16, 435, 10.1007/s00191-006-0026-4

Scott, 2002, Mind the gap: Law and new approaches to governance in the European Union, Eur. Law J., 8, 1, 10.1111/1468-0386.00139

van der Vooren, 2013, Evaluating CO2 reduction policy mixes in the automotive sector, Environ. Innov. Societal Transit., 10.1016/j.eist.2013.10.001

Venables, 1999

Wolf, 2003, The impact of REACH on innovation in the chemical industry