The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments

Ecological Economics - Tập 69 Số 8 - Trang 1595-1603 - 2010
David Hoyos1
1Environmental Economics Unit, Institute for Public Economics, University of the Basque Country, E48015 Bilbao, Spain

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adamowicz, 2006, Frontiers in stated preference methods: an introduction, Environmental and Resource Economics, 34, 1, 10.1007/s10640-005-4818-z

Adamowicz, 1994, Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 271, 10.1006/jeem.1994.1017

Adamowicz, 1998, Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiment and contingent valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80, 64, 10.2307/3180269

Adamowicz, 2008, Behavioral frontiers in choice modeling, Marketing Letters, 19, 215, 10.1007/s11002-008-9038-1

Alpizar, 2001, Using choice experiments for non-market valuation, Economic Issues, 8, 83

Araña, 2009, Understanding the use of non-compensatory decision rules in discrete choice experiments: the role of emotions, Ecological Economics, 68, 2316, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.003

Bateman, I.J., Carson, R.T., Day, B.H., Dupont, D., Louviere, J., Morimoto, S., Scarpa, R., Wang, P., 2008. Choice set awareness and ordering effects in choice experiments. Paper presented to the 2008 EAERE Conference in Gothenburg, Sweden.

Ben-Akiva, 1985

Berry, 1995, Automobile prices in market equilibrium, Econometrica, 63, 841, 10.2307/2171802

Bienabe, 2006, Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and scenic beauty within a framework of environmental services payments, Forest Policy and Economics, 9, 335, 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.10.002

Birol, 2006, Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: the case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece, Ecological Economics, 60, 145, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.002

Bliemer, 2006, Designing stated choice experiments: state-of-the-art

Bliemer, 2009, Efficient stated choice experiments for estimating nested logit models, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 43, 19, 10.1016/j.trb.2008.05.008

Campbell, 2008, Incorporating discontinuous preferences into the analysis of discrete choice experiments, Environmental and Resource Economics, 41, 401, 10.1007/s10640-008-9198-8

Caparros, 2008, Would you choose your preferred option? Comparing choice and recoded ranking experiments, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90, 843, 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01137.x

Carlsson, 2001, Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments? Application to the valuation of the environment, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41, 179, 10.1006/jeem.2000.1138

Carson, 1994, Experimental analysis of choice, Marketing Letters, 5, 351, 10.1007/BF00999210

Champ, 2007, Survey Methodologies for Stated Choice Studies, 21

Cox, 1961, Test of separate families of hypotheses, Vol. 1

Cox, 1962, Further results on tests of separate families of hypotheses, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 24, 406

Davidson, 1981, Several tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses, Econometrica, 49, 781, 10.2307/1911522

Day, 2010, Ordering anomalies in choice experiments, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59, 271, 10.1016/j.jeem.2010.03.001

Deshazo, 2002, Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: the effects of complexity on choice consistency, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44, 123, 10.1006/jeem.2001.1199

Fiebig, 2009, The generalized multinomial logit model: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity, Marketing Science, 1

Fosgerau, 2008, Specification testing of discrete choice models: a note on the use of a nonparametric test, Journal of Choice Modelling, 1, 26, 10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70021-6

Fosgerau, 2007, A practical test for the choice of mixing distribution in discrete choice models, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 41, 784, 10.1016/j.trb.2007.01.002

Fosgerau, 2009, Discrete choice models with multiplicative error terms, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 43, 494, 10.1016/j.trb.2008.10.004

Foster, 2003, Elicitation format and sensitivity to scope, Environmental and Resource Economics, 24, 141, 10.1023/A:1022856329552

Goldberg, 2007, Scope insensitivity in health reduction studies: a comparison of choice experiments and the contingent valuation method for valuing safer food, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 34, 123, 10.1007/s11166-007-9006-9

Greene, 2003

Haab, 2002

Hanemann, 1984, Discrete/continuous models of consumer demand, Econometrica, 52, 541, 10.2307/1913464

Hanley, 2001, Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation?, Journal of Economic Surveys, 15, 435, 10.1111/1467-6419.00145

Hanley, 2005, Price vector effects in choice experiments: an empirical test, Resource and Energy Economics, 27, 227, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2004.11.001

Harrison, 2007, Making choice studies incentive compatible, 67

Hensher, 2007, Attribute processing in choice experiments and implications on willingness to pay, 135

Hensher, 2008, Joint estimation of process and outcome in choice experiments and implications for willingness to pay, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 42, 297

Hensher, D.A., in press. Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

Hensher, 2005

Hess, 2005, Estimation of value of travel-time savings using mixed logit models, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39, 221, 10.1016/j.tra.2004.09.007

Hess, 2008, Asymmetric preference formation in willingness to pay estimates in discrete choice models, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44, 847, 10.1016/j.tre.2007.06.002

Horne, 2005, Multiple-use management of forest recreation sites: a spatially explicit choice experiment, Forest Ecology and Management, 207, 189, 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.026

Hoyos, 2009, The influence of cultural identity on the WTP to protect natural resources: some empirical evidence, Ecological Economics, 68, 2372, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.015

Huber, 2001, On the similarity of classical and Bayesian estimates of individual mean partworths, Marketing Letters, 12, 259, 10.1023/A:1011120928698

Huber, 1996, The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs, Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 307, 10.2307/3152127

Jin, 2006, Comparison of contingent valuation and choice experiment in solid waste management programs in Macao, Ecological Economics, 57, 430, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.020

Johnson, 2001, Sources and effects of utility-theoretic inconsistency in Stated Preference surveys, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83, 1328, 10.1111/0002-9092.00286

Kahneman, 2002, Representativeness revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment

2007

Kessels, 2006, A comparison of criteria to design efficient choice experiments, Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 409, 10.1509/jmkr.43.3.409

Krinsky, 1986, On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68, 715, 10.2307/1924536

Ladenburg, 2008, Gender-specific starting point bias in choice experiments: Evidence from an empirical study, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 56, 275, 10.1016/j.jeem.2008.01.004

Lancaster, 1966, A new approach to consumer theory, Journal of Political Economy, 74, 132, 10.1086/259131

Lancsar, 2006, Deleting ‘irrational’ responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?, Health Economics, 15, 797, 10.1002/hec.1104

Lancsar, 2008, Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making. A user's guide, PharmacoEconomics, 26, 661, 10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004

Lanz, 2009, Investigating willingness to pay — willingness to accept asymmetry in choice experiments

Layton, 2000, Heterogeneous preferences regarding global climate change, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 616, 10.1162/003465300559091

Layton, 2006, Embracing model uncertainty: strategies for response pooling and model averaging, Environmental and Resource Economics, 34, 51, 10.1007/s10640-005-3784-9

Louviere, 2006, What you don't know might hurt you: some unresolved issues in the design and analysis of discrete choice experiments, Environmental and Resource Economics, 34, 173, 10.1007/s10640-005-4817-0

Louviere, 1982, On the design and analysis of simulated choice or allocation experiments in travel choice modelling, Transportation Research Record, 890, 11

Louviere, 2009, Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future, Health Economics, Policy and Law, 4, 527, 10.1017/S1744133109990193

Louviere, 1983, Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregate data, Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 350, 10.2307/3151440

Louviere, 2000

Louviere, 2005, Recent progress on endogeneity in choice modeling, Marketing Letters, 16, 255, 10.1007/s11002-005-5890-4

Lusk, 2004, Are choice experiments incentive compatible? A test with quality differentiated beef steaks, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86, 467, 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00592.x

Magidson, 2007, Removing the Scale Factor Confound in Multinomial Logit Choice Models to Obtain Better Estimates of Preference

McFadden, 1974, Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior

McFadden, D., 1995. Computing willingness-to-pay in random utility models. Working Paper. Department of Economics. University of California, Berkeley.

McFadden, 2000, Mixed MNL models for discrete response, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15, 447, 10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5<447::AID-JAE570>3.0.CO;2-1

McIntosh, 2002, Using discrete choice experiments to derive welfare estimates for the provision of elective surgery: implications of discontinuous preferences, Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 367, 10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00081-8

Meyerhoff, 2009, Discontinuous preferences in choice experiments: evidence at the choice task level

Mitchell, 1989

Mogas, 2006, A comparison of contingent valuation and choice modelling with second-order interactions, Journal of Forest Economics, 12, 5, 10.1016/j.jfe.2005.11.001

Morey, 1993, A repeated nested-logit model of Atlantic salmon fishing, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75, 578, 10.2307/1243565

Morrison, 2002, Choice modelling and tests of benefit transfer, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84, 161, 10.1111/1467-8276.00250

Nielsen, 2007, An economic valuation of the recreational benefits associated with nature-based forest management practices, Landscape and Urban Planning, 80, 63, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.003

Park, 2009, Simulated maximum likelihood estimator for the random coefficient logit model using aggregate data, Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 531, 10.1509/jmkr.46.4.531

Payne, 1993

Petrin, 2010, A control function apprach to endogeneity in consumer choice models, Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 3, 10.1509/jmkr.47.1.3

Puckett, 2009, Revealing the extent of process heterogeneity in choice analysis: an empirical assessment, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43, 117, 10.1016/j.tra.2008.07.003

Revelt, 1998, Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 647, 10.1162/003465398557735

Revelt, 2001

Rolfe, 2000, Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation, Ecological Economics, 35, 289, 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00201-9

Rose, 2009, Incorporating model uncertainty into the generation of efficient stated choice experiments: a model averaging approach

Salisbury, 2010, Alleviating the constant stochastic variance assumption in decision research: theory, measurement and experimental test, Marketing Science, 29, 1, 10.1287/mksc.1080.0464

Scarpa, 2007, Benefit estimates for landscape improvements: sequential bayesian design and respondents' rationality in a choice experiment, Land Economics, 83, 617, 10.3368/le.83.4.617

Schkade, 1994, How people respond to contingent valuation questions: a verbal protocol analysis of willingness to pay for an environmental regulation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 88, 10.1006/jeem.1994.1006

Scott, 2002, Identifying and analysing dominant preferences in discrete choice experiments: an application in health care, Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 383, 10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00082-X

Shogren, 2006, Valuation in the lab, Environmental and Resource Economics, 34, 163, 10.1007/s10640-005-3785-8

Street, 2005, Quick and easy choice sets: constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22, 459, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2005.09.003

Swait, 2001, Choice environment, market complexity, and consumer behavior: a theoretical and empirical approach for incorporating decision complexity into models of consumer choice, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 141, 10.1006/obhd.2000.2941

Train, 2003

Train, 2005, Mixed logit with bounded distributions of correlated partworths, 1

Train, 2005, Discrete choice models in preference space and willingness-to-pay space, 1

Tversky, 1972, Elimination by aspects: a theory of choice, Psychological Review, 79, 281, 10.1037/h0032955

Xu, 2003, Valuing biodiversity, aesthetics and job losses associated with ecosystem management using stated preferences, Forest Science, 49, 247