Perception of COVID-19 vaccination among Indian Twitter users: computational approach

Journal of Computational Social Science - Tập 6 - Trang 541-560 - 2023
Prateeksha Dawn Davidson1, Thanujah Muniandy2, Dhivya Karmegam3
1Model Rural Health Research Unit, ICMR, Chennai, India
2Meltwater, Kuantan, Malaysia
3School of Public Health, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India

Tóm tắt

Vaccination has been a hot topic in the present COVID-19 context. The government, public health stakeholders and media are all concerned about how to get the people vaccinated. The study was intended to explore the perception and emotions of the Indians citizens toward COVID-19 vaccine from Twitter messages. The tweets were collected for the period of 6 months, from mid-January to June, 2021 using hash-tags and keywords specific to India. Topics and emotions from the tweets were extracted using Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) method and National Research Council (NRC) Lexicon, respectively. Theme, sentiment and emotion wise engagement and reachability metrics were assessed. Hash-tag frequency of COVID-19 vaccine brands were also identified and evaluated. Information regarding ‘Co-WIN app and availability of vaccine’ was widely discussed and also received highest engagement and reachability among Twitter users. Among the various emotions, trust was expressed the most, which highlights the acceptance of vaccines among the Indian citizens. The hash-tags frequency of vaccine brands shows that Covishield was popular in the month of March 2021, and Covaxin in April 2021. The results from the study will help stakeholders to efficiently use social media to disseminate COVID-19 vaccine information on popular concerns. This in turn will encourage citizens to be vaccinated and achieve herd immunity. Similar methodology can be adopted in future to understand the perceptions and concerns of people in emergency situations.

Tài liệu tham khảo

World Health Organization. (2021). WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard With Vaccination Data. World Health Organization. https://covid19.who.int./region/searo/country/in. (Accessed 1 Jul 2021).

Government of India. (2020). CoWin Dashboard. https://www.cowin.gov.in/ (Accessed 28 Jul 2022).

Sinnenberg, L., Buttenheim, A. M., Padrez, K., et al. (2017). Twitter as a tool for health research: a systematic review. American Journal of Public Health, 107, e1-8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303512

Shoaei, M. D., & Dastani, M. (2020). The role of twitter during the COVID-19 crisis: a systematic literature review. Acta Informatica Pragensia, 9, 154–169. https://doi.org/10.18267/J.AIP.138

Charquero-Ballester, M., Walter, J. G., Nissen, I. A., et al. (2021). Different types of COVID-19 misinformation have different emotional valence on Twitter. Big Data & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211041279/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_20539517211041279-FIG2.JPEG

Su, Y., Wu, P., Li, S., et al. (2021). Public emotion responses during COVID-19 in China on social media: an observational study. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3, 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/HBE2.239

Frederiksen, L. S. F., Zhang, Y., Foged, C., et al. (2020). The long road toward COVID-19 herd immunity: Vaccine platform technologies and mass immunization strategies. Frontiers in Immunology, 11, 1817. https://doi.org/10.3389/FIMMU.2020.01817/BIBTEX

Aguas, R., Corder, R.M., & King, J.G., et al. (2022). Herd immunity thresholds for SARS-CoV-2 estimated from unfolding epidemics. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.23.20160762

Sallam, M. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy worldwide: a concise systematic review of vaccine acceptance rates. Vaccines, 9, 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/VACCINES9020160

Shaaban, R., Ghazy, R. M., Elsherif, F., et al. (2022). COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among social media users: a content analysis, multi-continent study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 5737. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH19095737

Twitter. (2022). About Twitter|Our Company and Priorities. https://about.twitter.com/en (Accessed 23 Nov 2022).

Li, I., Li, Y., Li, T., et al. (2020). What are we depressed about when we talk about COVID-19: Mental health analysis on tweets using natural language processing. Lect Notes Artif Intell Lect Notes Bioinformatics, 12498, 358–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63799-6_27/COVER

Guntuku, S. C., Sherman, G., Stokes, D. C., et al. (2020). Tracking mental health and symptom mentions on Twitter during COVID-19. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 35, 2798–2800. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11606-020-05988-8/FIGURES/2

Bonnevie, E., Gallegos-Jeffrey, A., Goldbarg, J., et al. (2021). Quantifying the rise of vaccine opposition on Twitter during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 14, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2020.1858222/SUPPL_FILE/YCIH_A_1858222_SM6843.DOCX

Piltch-Loeb, R., & Diclemente, R. (2020). The vaccine uptake continuum: Applying social science theory to shift vaccine hesitancy. Vaccines, 8, 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/VACCINES8010076

Odlum, M., Cho, H., & Broadwell, P., et al. (2020). Application of topic modeling to tweetsas the foundation for health disparity research for COVID-19. In Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. IOS Press, 24–7. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI200484

Albalawi, R., Yeap, T. H., & Benyoucef, M. (2020). Using topic modeling methods for short-text data: a comparative analysis. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 3, 42. https://doi.org/10.3389/FRAI.2020.00042/BIBTEX

Xue, J., Chen, J., Hu, R., et al. (2020). Twitter discussions and concerns about COVID-19 pandemic: Twitter data analysis using a machine learning approach. Published Online First. https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.20550

Nikita, M., & Chaney, N. (2020). Tuning of the latent dirichlet allocation models parameters [R package ldatuning version 1.0.2]. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. https://cran.r-project.org/package=ldatuning (Accessed 28 Jul 2021).

Mohammad, S.M. (2020). Considerations in the effective use of emotion and sentiment lexicons. http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.03492 (Accessed 27 Nov 2022).

Tabak, F.S., & Evrim, V. (2016). Comparison of emotion lexicons. In: 13th HONET-ICT International Symposium on Smart MicroGrids for Sustainable Energy Sources Enabled by Photonics and IoT Sensors, HONET-ICT 2016, pp 154–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/HONET.2016.7753440

Kušen, E., Cascavilla, G., & Figl, K., et al. (2017). Identifying emotions in social media: Comparison of word-emotion lexicons. In: Proceedings - 2017 5th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud Workshops, W-FiCloud 2017. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. pp. 132–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/FiCloudW.2017.75

Bravo-Marquez, F., Mendoza, M., & Poblete, B. (2013). Combining strengths, emotions and polarities for boosting Twitter sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Issues of Sentiment Discovery and Opinion Mining - WISDOM ’13. pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/2502069.2502071

Kaila, R. P., & Prasad, A. V. K. (2020). Informational flow on twitter-corona virus outbreak-topic modelling approach. International Journal Of Advance Research In Engineering, 11, 128–134. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJARET.11.3.2020.011

Hanley, H. (1986). Modern Epidemiology. Boston: Little, Brown & Co. https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1390499 (Accessed 21 Jan 2023).

Sahai, H., & Khurshid, A. (1996). Statistics in epidemiology: Methods, techniques, and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press Inc.

Hu, T., Wang, S., & Luo, W., et al. (2021). Revealing public opinion towards COVID-19 vaccines with twitter data in the United States: Spatiotemporal perspective. Journal of Medical Internet Research 23(9), e30854. https://doi.org/10.2196/30854.https://www.jmir.org/2021/9/e30854

Madanian, S., Parry, D. T., Airehrour, D., et al. (2019). MHealth and big-data integration: Promises for healthcare system in India. BMJ Health and Care Informatics., 26, 100071. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100071