A longitudinal analysis of the public perception of the opportunities and challenges of the Internet of Things

PLoS ONE - Tập 13 Số 12 - Trang e0209472
Arkaitz Zubiaga1, Rob Procter2,1, Carsten Maple2,1
1University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
2Alan Turing Institute, London, United Kingdom

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

F Xia, 2012, Internet of things, International Journal of Communication Systems, 25, 1101, 10.1002/dac.2417

J Gubbi, 2013, Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions, Future generation computer systems, 29, 1645, 10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010

G Reiter, 2014, Wireless connectivity for the Internet of Things, Europe, 433, 868MHz

A Osseiran, 2017, Internet of Things, IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, 1, 84, 10.1109/MCOMSTD.2017.7992936

Xu T, Wendt JB, Potkonjak M. Security of IoT systems: Design challenges and opportunities. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design. IEEE Press; 2014. p. 417–423.

MU Farooq, 2015, A critical analysis on the security concerns of internet of things (IoT), International Journal of Computer Applications, 111, 10.5120/19547-1280

Hwang YH. Iot security & privacy: threats and challenges. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on IoT Privacy, Trust, and Security. ACM; 2015. p. 1–1.

Zhao K, Ge L. A survey on the internet of things security. In: Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS), 2013 9th International Conference on. IEEE; 2013. p. 663–667.

Tellez M, El-Tawab S, Heydari HM. Improving the security of wireless sensor networks in an IoT environmental monitoring system. In: Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS), 2016 IEEE. IEEE; 2016. p. 72–77.

M Stanislav, 2015, Hacking iot: A case study on baby monitor exposures and vulnerabilities, Rapid, 7

D Miessler, 2015, IoT Attack Surface Mapping, DEFCON

SR Islam, 2015, The internet of things for health care: a comprehensive survey, IEEE Access, 3, 678, 10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2437951

Q Jing, 2014, Security of the internet of things: Perspectives and challenges, Wireless Networks, 20, 2481, 10.1007/s11276-014-0761-7

J Granjal, 2015, Security for the internet of things: a survey of existing protocols and open research issues, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17, 1294, 10.1109/COMST.2015.2388550

Sadeghi AR, Wachsmann C, Waidner M. Security and privacy challenges in industrial internet of things. In: Design Automation Conference (DAC), 2015 52nd ACM/EDAC/IEEE. IEEE; 2015. p. 1–6.

C Maple, 2017, Security and privacy in the internet of things, Journal of Cyber Policy, 2, 155, 10.1080/23738871.2017.1366536

RH Weber, 2010, Internet of Things–New security and privacy challenges, Computer law & security review, 26, 23, 10.1016/j.clsr.2009.11.008

L Atzori, 2010, The internet of things: A survey, Computer networks, 54, 2787, 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010

M Asplund, 2016, Attitudes and Perceptions of IoT Security in Critical Societal Services, IEEE Access, 4, 2130, 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2560919

N Joseph, 2017, Review of Discussions on Internet of Things (IoT): Insights from Twitter Analytics, Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 25, 38, 10.4018/JGIM.2017040103

J Bian, 2016, Mining Twitter to Assess the Public Perception of the “Internet of Things”, PloS one, 11, e0158450, 10.1371/journal.pone.0158450

curl: command line tool and library for transferring data with URLs;. Accessed: 2018-10-10. <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://curl.haxx.se/" xlink:type="simple">https://curl.haxx.se/</ext-link>.

A Zubiaga, 2017, Towards real-time, country-level location classification of worldwide tweets, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering

GitHub: python code for tweet country classification;. Accessed: 2018-10-10. <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/azubiaga/tweet-country-classification" xlink:type="simple">https://github.com/azubiaga/tweet-country-classification</ext-link>.

Figshare: Tweet geolocation 5m dataset;. Accessed: 2018-10-10. <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://figshare.com/articles/Tweet_geolocation_5m/3168529" xlink:type="simple">https://figshare.com/articles/Tweet_geolocation_5m/3168529</ext-link>.

Python package SexMachine;. Accessed: 2018-10-10. <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pypi.org/project/SexMachine/" xlink:type="simple">https://pypi.org/project/SexMachine/</ext-link>.

B Wang, 2017, Proceedings of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 483

Wang B, Liakata M, Tsakalidis A, Georgakopoulos Kolaitis S, Papadopoulos S, Apostolidis L, et al. TOTEMSS: Topic-based, Temporal Sentiment Summarisation for Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, IJCNLP; 2017.

DM Blei, 2003, Latent dirichlet allocation, Journal of machine Learning research, 3, 993

gensim: Topic modelling for humans;. Accessed: 2018-10-10. <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://radimrehurek.com/gensim/" xlink:type="simple">https://radimrehurek.com/gensim/</ext-link>.

Wang B, Liakata M, Zubiaga A, Procter R. A Hierarchical Topic Modelling Approach for Tweet Clustering. In: International Conference on Social Informatics. Springer; 2017. p. 378–390.

Hutto C, Gilbert E. VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-Based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text. In: Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media; 2014.

E Ferrara, 2016, The rise of social bots, Communications of the ACM, 59, 96, 10.1145/2818717

S Castell, 2017, Public Views of Machine Learning, Ipsos MORI

Schreiber R, Lawton T. Comparing Global Industry 4.0 Readiness;. <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://industrytoday.com/article/comparing-global-industry-4-0-readiness/" xlink:type="simple">https://industrytoday.com/article/comparing-global-industry-4-0-readiness/</ext-link>.

E Fast, 2017, Long-Term Trends in the Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence, 963

S Castell, 2014, Public attitudes to science 2014, London, Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute, 194, 28

Sample I. Artificial intelligence survey finds UK public broadly optimistic;. <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/apr/25/artificial-intelligence-survey-finds-uk-public-broadly-optimistic-mass-unemployment" xlink:type="simple">https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/apr/25/artificial-intelligence-survey-finds-uk-public-broadly-optimistic-mass-unemployment</ext-link>.

World Bank Open Data;. Accessed: 2018-10-10. <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://data.worldbank.org/" xlink:type="simple">https://data.worldbank.org/</ext-link>.

CM Ray, 1999, Men’s and women’s attitudes toward computer technology: A comparison, Office Systems Research Journal, 17, 1

BK Wiederhold, 2014, Marketing analysis of a positive technology app for the self-management of psychological stress, Stud Health Technol Inform, 199, 83

Rose A. The Internet of Things Has Arrived—and so Have Massive Security Issues;. <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.wired.com/2013/01/securing-the-internet-of-things/" xlink:type="simple">https://www.wired.com/2013/01/securing-the-internet-of-things/</ext-link>.

S Li, 2017, Syngress

RR Yager, 2017, New Advances in the Internet of Things

Rao D, Yarowsky D, Shreevats A, Gupta M. Classifying latent user attributes in twitter. In: Proceedings of the workshop on Search and mining user-generated contents; 2010. p. 37–44.

JE Sale, 2002, Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research, Quality and quantity, 36, 43, 10.1023/A:1014301607592

V Venkatesh, 2013, Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems, MIS quarterly, 37, 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02