Environmental and economic effects of the Copenhagen pledges and more ambitious emission reduction targets

Energy Policy - Tập 39 - Trang 3697-3708 - 2011
Everett B. Peterson1, Joachim Schleich1,2,3, Vicki Duscha2
1Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, 202A Hutcheson Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
2Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Breslauer Strasse 48, 76139, Karlsruhe, Germany
3Grenoble Ecole de Management, 12, rue Pierre Sémard, BP 127, 38003 Grenoble Cedex 01, France

Tài liệu tham khảo

Amann, 2009

Bernard, 2009, Assessment of European Union transition scenarios with a special focus on the issue of carbon leakage, Energy Economics, 31, 274, 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.08.013

Böhringer, 2003, Climate policy beyond Kyoto: quo vadis? A computable general equilibrium analysis based on expert judgments, KYKLOS, 58, 467, 10.1111/j.0023-5962.2005.00298.x

Böhringer, 2003, Economic and environmental impacts of the Kyoto protocol, Canadian Journal of Economics, 36, 475, 10.1111/1540-5982.t01-1-00010

Böhringer, 2009, EU climate policy up to 2020: an economic impact assessment, Energy Economics, 31, S295, 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.09.009

Böhringer, 2010, The costs of compliance: a cge assessment of Canada's policy options under the Kyoto protocol, World Economy, 33, 177, 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2009.01229.x

Burniaux, J.-M., Oliveira Martins, J., 2000. Carbon Emission Leakages: A General Equilibrium View, OECD Economics Department Working Paper 242.

Burniaux, J.-M., Truong, P., 2002. GTAP-E: An Energy-Environmental Version of the GTAP Model. GTAP Technical Paper No. 16 (Revised), January.

Dellink, R., Briner G., Clapp, C., 2010. Costs, Revenues, and Effectiveness of the Copenhagen Accord Emission Pledges for 2020, OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 22, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/5km975plmzg6-en

Den Elzen, 2010, Postponing emission reductions from 2020 to 2030 increases climate risks and long-term costs, Climatic Change, 99, 313, 10.1007/s10584-010-9798-5

Den Elzen, 2010, The Copenhagen Accord: abatement costs and carbon prices resulting from the submissions, Environmental Science & Policy

Den Elzen, 2010, Dealing with surplus emissions in the climate negotiations after Copenhagen: what are the options for compromise?, Energy Policy, 38, 6615, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.032

Den Elzen, 2008, Reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in Annex I and non-Annex I countries for meeting concentration stabilisation targets: an editorial comment, Climate Change, 91, 249, 10.1007/s10584-008-9484-z

Duscha, 2010, Post-2012 climate regime: how industrial and developing nations can help to reduce emissions—emission trends, reduction potentials, incentive systems and negotiation options, Climate Change, 12/10

Edenhofer, 2010, ADAM's modeling comparison project—intentions and prospects, Energy Journal, 31, 7, 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-NoSI-1

European Commission, 2009a. Towards a Comprehensive Climate Change Agreement in Copenhagen. COM(2009) 39 final.

European Commission, 2009b. Towards a Comprehensive Climate Change Agreement in Copenhagen—Extensive Background Information and Analysis. Part 2. Commission Staff Working Document. SEC(2009), 101.

Gurney, 2009, The economics of greenhouse gas mitigation: insights from illustrative global abatement scenarios modelling, Energy Economics, 31, S174, 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.08.016

Gupta, 2007, Policies, instruments and co-operative arrangements

Hanslow, K., 2000. A General Welfare Decomposition for CGE Models. GTAP Technical Paper No. 19, Global Trade Analysis Project, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette.

2010

Ianchovichina, E., McDougall, R., 2001. Theoretical Structure of Dynamic GTAP. GTAP Technical Paper No. 17, Global Trade Analysis Project, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette.

Ianchovichina, E., Walmsley, T., (Eds.), Dynamic Modeling and Applications for Global Economic Analysis. Cambridge University Press, forthcoming

Kemfert, 1998, Estimated substitution elasticities of a nested CES production function for Germany, Energy Economics, 20, 249, 10.1016/S0140-9883(97)00014-5

Kemfert, C., Schumacher, K., 2005. Costs of Inaction and Costs of Action in Climate Protection. DIW Berlin Final Report of Project FKZ 90441362 for the German Federal Ministry of the Environment.

Kemfert, 2007, Impact assessment of emissions stabilization scenarios with and without induced technological change, Energy Policy, 35, 5337, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.01.033

Kitous, 2010, Transformation patterns of the worldwide energy system—scenarios for the century with the POLES model, Energy Journal, 31, 49, 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-NoSI-3

Kuik, 2010, Border adjustment for European emissions trading: competitiveness and carbon leakage, Energy Policy, 38, 1741, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.048

Nijkamp, 2005, Modeling the impacts of international climate change policies in a CGE context: the use of the GTAP-E model, Economic Modelling, 22, 955, 10.1016/j.econmod.2005.06.001

Paltsev, 2001, The Kyoto Protocol: regional and sectoral contributions to the carbon leakage, Energy Journal, 22, 53, 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol22-No4-3

Peterson, 2009, Implications of Incorporating domestic margins into analyses of energy taxation and climate change, Economic Modelling, 26, 370, 10.1016/j.econmod.2008.08.004

Peterson, S., Klepper, G., 2007. Distribution Matters—Taxes vs. Emissions Trading in Post Kyoto Climate Regimes. Kiel Working Paper No. 1380, September.

Reinaud, J., 2008. Issues Behind Competitiveness and Carbon Leakage—Focus on Heavy Industry. IEA Information Paper. International Energy Agency, Paris.

Rogelj, J., Meinshausen, M., Nabel, J., et al., 2010. Copenhagen Accord Pledges are Paltry. Nature Report 464, pp. 1126–1128.

Stern, 2007

Stern, N., Taylor, C., 2010. What do the Appendices to the Copenhagen Accord tell us about Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Prospects for Avoiding a Rise in Global Average Temperature of More Than 2°C? Policy Paper, Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.

UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change), 2009. Copenhagen Accord. FCCC/CP/2009/L.7.

US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency), 2009. EPA Analysis of the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 H.R. 2454 in the 111th Congress. 〈http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/economics/economicanalyses.html〉.

Van Asselt, 2010, Addressing competitiveness and leakage concerns in climate policy: an analysis of border adjustment measures in the US and the EU, Energy Policy, 38, 42, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.061

Van der Werf, 2008, Production functions for climate policy modelling: an empirical analysis, Energy Economics, 30, 2964, 10.1016/j.eneco.2008.05.008

Van Vuuren, D. P., Isaac, M., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Arnell, N., Barker, T., Criqui, P., Bauer, N., Berkhout, F., Hilderink, H., Hinkel, J., Hof, A., Kitous, A., Kram, T., Mechler, R., Radziejewski, M., Scrieciu, S., 2009. D-S.1b: Final Deliverable Scenario Workpackage. July 2009. 〈http://adamproject.info/index.php/Download-document/471-D-S.1b.html〉.

Wagner, 2009

Wicke, L., Schellnhuber, H.-J., Klingenfeld, D., 2010. Nach Kopenhagen: Neue Strategie zum Realisieren des 2°-Max Klimazieles. PIK Report 116. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research PIK, Potsdam.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Energy Policy

Tập 39

3697-3708

Thông tin tác giả