The Copenhagen Accord: abatement costs and carbon prices resulting from the submissions

Environmental Science and Policy - Tập 14 - Trang 28-39 - 2011
Michel G.J. den Elzen1, Andries F. Hof1, Angelica Mendoza Beltran1, Giacomo Grassi2, Mark Roelfsema1, Bas van Ruijven1, Jasper van Vliet1, Detlef P. van Vuuren1
1Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), Department of Climate, Air and Energy, P.O. Box 303, 3720 AH Bilthoven, The Netherlands
2Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Climate Change Unit, Ispra, Italy

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bouwman, 2006 Dellink, R., Briner, G., Clapp, C., 2010. Costs, Revenues, and Effectiveness of the Copenhagen Accord Emission Pledges for 2020, OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 22, OECD Publishing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5km975plmzg6-en. den Elzen, 2009, Exploring comparable post-2012 reduction efforts for Annex I countries, Energy Policy, 37, 4114, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.010 den Elzen, 2008, Regional abatement action and costs under allocation schemes for emission allowances for achieving low CO2-equivalent concentrations, Climatic Change, 90, 243, 10.1007/s10584-008-9466-1 den Elzen, M.G.J., Hof, A.F., Mendoza Beltran, A., et al., 2010a. Evaluation of the Copenhagen Accord: chances and risks for the 2°C climate goal. PBL Report 500114017/2010, www.pbl.nl\en. den Elzen, 2010, Dealing with surplus emissions in the climate negotiations after Copenhagen: what are the options for compromise?, Energy Policy, 38, 6615, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.032 European Climate Foundation, 2010. Taking stock – the emission levels implied by the pledges to the Copenhagen Accord. Catalyst Briefing paper February 2010, see www.climateworks.org. European Commission, 2010. Analysis of options to move beyond 20% greenhouse gas emission reductions and assessing the risk of carbon leakage. SEC(2010) 650, COM/2010/0265, Brussels, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/climat/future_action.htm. Kindermann, 2008, Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation, PNAS, 105, 10302, 10.1073/pnas.0710616105 Lucas, 2007, Long-term reduction potential of non-CO2 greenhouse gases, Environmental Science & Policy, 10, 85, 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.007 Michaelowa, 2005, Transaction costs, institutional rigidities and the size of the clean development mechanism, Energy Policy, 33, 511, 10.1016/j.enpol.2003.08.016 Point Carbon, 2009. Assigned Amount Unit: seller/buyer analysis and impact on post-2012 climate regime. Point Carbon, see: www.pointcarbon.com. Rogelj, 2010, Copenhagen accord pledges are paltry, Nature Report, 464, 1126, 10.1038/4641126a Stern, 2010 van Vuuren, 2004, Responses to Technology and Taxes in a Simulated World, Energy Economics, 26, 579, 10.1016/j.eneco.2004.04.027 van Vuuren, 2007, Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs, Climatic Change, 81, 119, 10.1007/s10584-006-9172-9 van Vuuren, 2009, Comparison of different climate regimes: the impact of broadening participation, Energy Policy, 37, 5351, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.058 Weyant, 2006, Overview of EMF-21: multi-gas mitigation and climate change, Energy Journal, Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy, 1