Border adjustment for European emissions trading: Competitiveness and carbon leakage

Armington, P.A., 1969. A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. IMF Staff Papers, vol. 16, pp. 159–178. Babiker, 2005, The economic effects of border measures in subglobal climate agreements, Energy Journal, 26, 99, 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol26-No4-6 Beckman, 2009, Why previous estimates of the cost of climate mitigation are likely too low Burniaux, 2000 Burniaux, 2002 Convery, 2008, The European carbon market in action: lessons from the first trading period Di Maria, 2008, Carbon leakage revisited unilateral climate policy with directed technical change, Environmental and Resource Economics, 39, 55, 10.1007/s10640-007-9091-x Dröge, S. (Ed.), 2009. Tackling Leakage in a World of Unequal Carbon Prices. Climate Strategies, 〈www.climatestrategies.org.〉. European Commission, 2008. Impact Assessment – Commission Staff Working Document. Accompanying documents to the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the EU greenhouse gas emission allowances trading system. SEC(2008)52, Brussels. de Bruyn, 2008, Impacts on Competitiveness from EU ETS Demailly, 2006, CO2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: grandfathering versus output-based allocation, Climate Policy, 6, 93, 10.3763/cpol.2006.0606 Demailly, 2008, Leakage from climate policies and border tax adjustment: lessons from a geographic model of the cement industry, 333 Demailly, 2008, European emission trading scheme and competitiveness: a case study on the iron and steel industry, Energy Economics, 30, 2009, 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.01.020 Fischer, C., and Fox, A.K., 2004. Output-based allocations of emissions permits. Discussion Paper 04-37, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. Fischer, C., and Fox, A.K., 2009. Comparing policies to combat emissions leakage. Discussion Paper 09-02, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC. Grubb, 2002, Climatic implications of the Kyoto Protocol: the contribution of international spillover, Climatic Change, 54, 11, 10.1023/A:1015775417555 Grubb, 2006, Allocation and competitiveness in the EU emissions trading scheme: policy overview, Climate Policy, 6, 137, 10.3763/cpol.2006.0602 Houser, 2008 Hepburn, 2006, Auctioning of EU ETS phase II allowances: why and how?, Climate Policy, 6, 137, 10.3763/cpol.2006.0608 Hertel, 2008, Modeling land-use related greenhouse gas sources and sinks and their mitigation potential Hoel, 1996, Should a carbon tax be differentiated across sectors?, Journal of Public Economics, 59, 17, 10.1016/0047-2727(94)01490-6 Hourcade, 2007 Ismer, 2007 Kuik, 2003, Trade liberalization and carbon leakage, Energy Journal, 24, 97, 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol24-No3-4 Markusen, 1975, International externalities and optimal tax structures, Journal of International Economics, 5, 15, 10.1016/0022-1996(75)90025-2 Mathiesen, 2004, Climate policy and the steel industry: achieving global emissions reductions by an incomplete climate agreement, Energy Journal, 25, 91, 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol25-No4-5 McKibbin, 2008 Monjon, S. and Quirion, P. (2008). Border adjustments – implications of design options. In: Competitive Distortions and Leakage in a World of Different Carbon Prices. European Parliament, Policy Department, Economic and Scientific Policy. IP/A/CLIM/ST/2008-03 07 08 & 14 (Chapter 4). Paltsev, 2001, The Kyoto Protocol: regional and sectoral contributions to the carbon leakage, Energy Journal, 22, 53, 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol22-No4-3 Peterson, 2007 Ponssard, 2008, EU emissions trading and the cement sector: a spatial competition analysis, Climate Policy, 8, 467, 10.3763/cpol.2007.0500 Reinaud, 2008 WTO-UNEP, 2009, Trade and climate change