Elasticity-based determination of isovolumetric phases in the human heart

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance - Tập 12 - Trang 1-8 - 2010
Thomas Elgeti1, Mark Beling2, Bernd Hamm1, Jürgen Braun3, Ingolf Sack1
1Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
2Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pulmonology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
3Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany

Tóm tắt

To directly determine isovolumetric cardiac time intervals by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) using the magnitude of the complex signal for deducing morphological information combined with the phase of the complex signal for tension-relaxation measurements. Thirty-five healthy volunteers and 11 patients with relaxation abnormalities were subjected to transthoracic wave stimulation using vibrations of approximately 25 Hz. A k-space-segmented, ECG-gated gradient-recalled echo steady-state sequence with a 500-Hz bipolar motion-encoding gradient was used for acquiring a series of 360 complex images of a short-axis view of the heart at a frame rate of less than 5.2 ms. Magnitude images were employed for measuring the cross-sectional area of the left ventricle, while phase images were used for analyzing the amplitudes of the externally induced waves. The delay between the decrease in amplitude and onset of ventricular contraction was determined in all subjects and assigned to the time of isovolumetric tension. Conversely, the delay between the increase in wave amplitude and ventricular dilatation was used for measuring the time of isovolumetric elasticity relaxation. Wave amplitudes decreased during systole and increased during diastole. The variation in wave amplitude occurred ahead of morphological changes. In healthy volunteers the time of isovolumetric elasticity relaxation was 75 ± 31 ms, which is significantly shorter than the time of isovolumetric tension of 136 ± 36 ms (P < 0.01). In patients with relaxation abnormalities (mild diastolic dysfunction, n = 11) isovolumetric elasticity relaxation was significantly prolonged, with 133 ± 57 ms (P < 0.01), whereas isovolumetric tension time was in the range of healthy controls (161 ± 45 ms; P = 0.053). The complex MRE signal conveys complementary information on cardiac morphology and elasticity, which can be combined for directly measuring isovolumetric tension and elasticity relaxation in the human heart.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Cui W, Roberson DA, Chen Z, Madronero LF, Cuneo BF: Systolic and diastolic time intervals measured from Doppler tissue imaging: normal values and Z-score tables, and effects of age, heart rate, and body surface area. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008, 21: 361-370. 10.1016/j.echo.2007.05.034.

Rump J, Klatt D, Braun J, Warmuth C, Sack I: Fractional encoding of harmonic motions in MR elastography. Magn Reson Med. 2007, 57: 388-395. 10.1002/mrm.21152.

Sack I, Rump J, Elgeti T, Samani A, Braun J: MR elastography of the human heart: noninvasive assessment of myocardial elasticity changes by shear wave amplitude variations. Magn Reson Med. 2009, 61: 668-677. 10.1002/mrm.21878.

Kolipaka A, Mcgee KP, Araoz PA, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Romano AJ, Ehman RL: MR elastography as a method for the assessment of myocardial stiffness: comparison with an established pressure-volume model in a left ventricular model of the heart. Magn Reson Med. 2009, 62: 135-140. 10.1002/mrm.21991.

Robert B, Sinkus R, Gennisson JL, Fink M: Application of DENSE-MR-elastography to the human heart. Magn Reson Med. 2009, 62: 1155-1163. 10.1002/mrm.22124.

Bouchard RR, Hsu SJ, Wolf PD, Trahey GE: In vivo cardiac, acoustic-radiation-force-driven, shear wave velocimetry. Ultrason Imaging. 2009, 31: 201-213.

Kanai H: Propagation of spontaneously actuated pulsive vibration in human heart wall and in vivo viscoelasticity estimation. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2005, 52: 1931-1942. 10.1109/TUFFC.2005.1561662.

Oliphant TE, Manduca A, Ehman RL, Greenleaf JF: Complex-valued stiffness reconstruction for magnetic resonance elastography by algebraic inversion of the differential equation. Magn Reson Med. 2001, 45: 299-310. 10.1002/1522-2594(200102)45:2<299::AID-MRM1039>3.0.CO;2-O.

Kolipaka A, McGee KP, Araoz PA, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Romano AJ, Ehman RL: MR elastography as a method for the assessment of myocardial stiffness: Comparison with an established pressure-volume model in a left ventricular model of the heart. Magn Reson Med. 2009, 62: 135-140. 10.1002/mrm.21991.

Elgeti T, Rump J, Hamhaber U, Papazoglou S, Hamm B, Braun J, Sack I: Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Elastography - Initial Results. Invest Radiol. 2008, 43: 762-772. 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181822085.

Slama M, Maizel J: Echocardiographic measurement of ventricular function. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006, 12: 241-248. 10.1097/01.ccx.0000224869.86205.1a.

Asbach P, Klatt D, Hamhaber U, Braun J, Somasundaram R, Hamm B, Sack I: Assessment of liver viscoelasticity using multifrequency MR elastography. Magn Reson Med. 2008, 60: 373-379. 10.1002/mrm.21636.

Woodrum DA, Romano AJ, Lerman A, Pandya UH, Brosh D, Rossman PJ, Lerman LO, Ehman RL: Vascular wall elasticity measurement by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2006, 56: 593-600. 10.1002/mrm.20991.

Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Grimm RC, Rossman PJ, Fidler JL, Ehman RL: Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007, 5: 1207-1213. 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.06.012. e1202

Sinkus R, Siegmann K, Xydeas T, Tanter M, Claussen C, Fink M: MR elastography of breast lesions: understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Magn Reson Med. 2007, 58: 1135-1144. 10.1002/mrm.21404.

Wuerfel J, Paul F, Beierbach B, Hamhaber U, Klatt D, Papazoglou S, Zipp F, Martus P, Braun J, Sack I: MR-elastography reveals degradation of tissue integrity in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage. 2010, 49: 2520-2525. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.018.

Zile MR, Brutsaert DL: New concepts in diastolic dysfunction and diastolic heart failure: Part I: diagnosis, prognosis, and measurements of diastolic function. Circulation. 2002, 105: 1387-1393. 10.1161/hc1102.105289.

van Heerebeek L, Borbély A, Niessen HWM, Bronzwaer JGF, van der Velden J, Stienen GJM, Linke WA, Laarman GJ, Paulus WJ: Myocardial structure and function differ in systolic and diastolic heart failure. Circulation. 2006, 113: 1966-1973. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.587519.

Oh JK, Tajik J: The return of cardiac time intervals: the phoenix is rising. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003, 42: 1471-1474. 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)01036-2.

Lauboeck H: Echocardiographic study of the isovolumetric contraction time. J Biomed Eng. 1980, 2: 281-284. 10.1016/0141-5425(80)90121-1.

Garcia MJ, Thomas JD, Klein AL: New Doppler echocardiographic applications for the study of diastolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998, 32: 865-875. 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00345-3.

Fung YC: Heart Muscle. In Biomechanics - Mechanical Properties of Living Tissue. 1993, New York: Springer-Verlag, 427-465.

Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, Marino PN, Oh JK, Smiseth OA, Waggoner AD, Flachskampf FA, Pellikka PA, Evangelista A: Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009, 22: 107-133. 10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.023.