Does competition foster trust? The role of tournament incentives

Experimental Economics - Tập 15 - Trang 204-228 - 2011
Steffen Keck1, Natalia Karelaia1
1INSEAD, Fontainebleau Cedex, France

Tóm tắt

Members of organizations are often called upon to trust others and to reciprocate trust while at the same time competing for bonuses or promotions. We suggest that competition affects trust not only within dyads including direct competitors, but also between individuals who do not compete against each other. We test this idea in a trust game where trustors and trustees are rewarded based either on their absolute performance or on how well they do relative to players from other dyads. In Experiment 1, we show that competition among trustors significantly increases trust. Competition among trustees decreases trustworthiness, but trustors do not anticipate this effect. In Experiment 2, we additionally show that the increase in trust under competition is caused by a combination of increased risk taking and lower sensitivity to non-financial concerns specific to trust interactions. Our results suggest that tournament incentives might have a “blinding effect” on considerations such as betrayal and inequality aversion.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122–142.

Boyle, M. (2001). Performance reviews: Perilous curves ahead. Fortune 15 May.

Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral game theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Csukas, C., Fracalanza, P., Kovacs, T., & Willinger, M. (2008). The determinants of trusting and reciprocal behaviour: Evidence from an intercultural experiment. Journal of Economic Development, 33, 71–95.

Glaeser, E. L., Laibson, D., Scheinkman, J., & Soutter, C. (2000). Measuring trust. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 811–846.

Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Monin, B., & Jordan, A. H. (2009). Dynamic moral identity: A social psychological perspective. In D. Narvaez & D. Lapsley (Eds.), Personality, identity, and character: explorations in moral psychology (pp. 341–354). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.