Cost–Effectiveness Analysis of Water Management Measures in Two River Basins of Jordan and Lebanon

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 23 - Trang 731-753 - 2008
Stéphanie Aulong1, Madjid Bouzit1, Nathalie Dörfliger1
1Water Department, BRGM French Geological Survey, Montpellier, France

Tóm tắt

Chekka Bay area and Amman Zarqa Basin are two complex river basins in northern Lebanon and northern Jordan respectively. Both regions are faced with growing populations, urban development and land-use changes. They also both suffer from water-resource scarcity and contrasted seasons that threaten the perennity of sufficient water supply. Decision makers may have several water-management measures in response to the issue of water deficiency in their regions, but they need simple methods and criteria for ranking the alternatives with respect to their economical efficiency. In this paper, the Cost–Effectiveness Analysis method is used for supporting decisions to optimally combine water management measures at the river basin scale. Hydrologic and socio-economic data are used for assessing the future water balance and determine the sustainable management objectives. Both supply- and demand-side measures are investigated and compared. The analysis is based on two basic metrics to assess cost–effectiveness ratios: the average annualized and the marginal (or incremental) unit cost. The results show that the cost–effectiveness ranking of alternative measures strongly depends on the selected metric. The average annualized unit cost systematically favours large scaled water measures with high costs while the average incremental unit cost facilitates the selection of smaller and costless measures reflecting the time preference for water supply.

Tài liệu tham khảo

ADB (1999) Handbook for the economic analysis of water supply projects. Asian Development Bank, Economics and Development Resource Center. Available at: http://www.adb.org/Documents/Handbooks/Water_Supply_Projects/default.asp. Cited Jul 2007

Aulong S, Bouzit M (2007) Deliverable #33. Report on cost–effectiveness analysis in the four MEDITATE case studies (Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey and Syria). BRGM—Geological Survey, Montpellier

CDR (2004) Schéma directeur d’aménagement du territoire Libanais. Conseil du Développement et de la Reconstruction Libanais (CDR), Beyrouth

ECOLOGIC (2004) Basic principles for selecting the most cost-effective combinations of measures for inclusion in the programme of measures as described in article 11 of the water framework directive—handbook. Federal Environmental Agency (Umweltbundesamt), Berlin

Fane S, White S (2003) Levelised cost, a general formula for calculations of unit cost in integrated resource planning. Paper presented at efficient 2003: efficient use and management of water for urban supply conference, Tenerife, 2–4 April 2003

Gerasidi A, Katsiardi P, Papaefstathiou N, Manoli E, Assimacopoulos D (2003) Cost–effectiveness analysis for water management in the island of Paros, Greece. Paper presented at 8th international conference on environmental science and technology, Lemnos Island, Greece, 8–10 September 2003

Howe C, White S (1999) Integrated resource planning for water and wastewater Sydney case studies. Water Int 24(4):356–362

Ker Rault P, Jeffrey P (2006) Collated report on water visions workshops for 2025: Amman Zarqa Basin, Kingdom of Jordan; Chekka bay, Lebanon; Tartous Governorate, Syria; Gökova Basin, Turkey. Deliverable #19. School of Water Sciences Cranfield Univ., Cranfield, UK

Latinopoulos P, Mylopoulos N, Mylopoulos Y (1997) Risk-based decision analysis in the design of water supply projects. Water Resour Manag 11(4):263

Lebègue D, Baumstark L, Hirtzman P (2005) Révision du taux d’actualisation des investissements publics. Commissariat Général du Plan, Paris, France

Massarutto A, Paccagnan V (2007) WFD harmonisation procedures review. The WFD implementation in arid and semi-arid countries: institutional and economic issues. Deliverable 1. Istituto di Economia e Politica dell’Energia e dell’Ambiente; Universita Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Italia

MoE (2001) State of the environment report 2001. Lebanon Ministry of Environment, Beirut, Lebanon

MWI (1997) Water sector investment program 1997–2011. Ministry of Water and Irrigation, Amman, Jordan

MWI (2004) National Water Master Plan (NWMP)—volume 3: water uses and demands. Ministry of Water and Irrigation & GTZ, Amman, Jordan

MWI and Consolidated Consultants (2004) Environmental and social assessment, Disi-Mudawarra to Amman water conveyance system. Part B. Water sector ESA. Ministry of Water and Irrigation, Amman, Jordan

U.S. EPA (2000) Guidelines for preparing economic analyses. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

WATECO (2003) Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance document no 1. European community—Working group 2.6—WATECO, Luxembourg

White SB, Fane SA, Robinson D (2003) The use of levelised cost in comparing supply and demand side options for water supply and wastewater treatment. Water Supply 3(3):185–192

Zanou B (2006) Decrease of non-point water pollution: a practical algorithm for the user-friendly presentation of the cost–effectiveness comparison of management measures. In: E-WAter. Official publication of the European Water Association (EWA). Available at: http://www.ewaonline.de/journal/2006_01.pdf. Cited Jul 2007