Academic culture in Malaysia: sources of satisfaction and frustration

Asia Pacific Education Review - Tập 16 - Trang 517-526 - 2015
Chang Da Wan1, David W. Chapman2, Ahmad Nurulazam Md Zain1, Sigrid Hutcheson3, Molly Lee4, Ann E. Austin5
1National Higher Education Research Institute (IPPTN), Universiti Sains Malaysia, Bayan Lepas, Malaysia
2Birkmaier Professor of Educational Leadership, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
3Independent Consultant, Minneapolis, USA
4Universiti Sains Malaysia, Bayan Lepas, Malaysia
5Erickson Professor of Higher, Adult and Lifelong Learning, 419A Erickson Hall, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA

Tóm tắt

This paper examines the sources of satisfaction and frustration among Malaysian academics across three types of higher education institutions (HEIs)—public research university, public comprehensive university and private non-profit university. Based on interview with 67 academics across six HEIs, there is a clear pattern and relationship between the sources of satisfaction and frustration and the types of institutions these academics were affiliated. The major sources of satisfaction are related to the nature of academic work, which includes supervising, mentoring, teaching and interacting with students, as well as conducting research and disseminating knowledge through publication. However, the major sources of frustration are predominantly related to the governance of higher education, resulting from unrealistic expectations, lack of transparency of the promotion and reward system, and a strong bureaucratic culture. The understanding of satisfaction and frustration has helped us to understand issues of morale, retention and, possibly, productivity of academics across these HEIs, and in turn, the understanding of these issues about academics has implications in understanding the governing structure of HEIs. Although this study is limited only to HEIs in Malaysia, the findings have wider implications in contributing to the understanding of governance and academic culture in the broader context of higher education.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Department of Higher Education, Malaysia (DHE). (2011). Categories of public HEIs. Retrieved September 9, 2014, from http://jpt.mohe.gov.my/eng/.

Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

Ministry of Education. (2014a). National education statistic: Higher education sector 2013. Putrajaya: MOE.

Ministry of Education. (2014b). Impact of Malaysian Research Universities as the engine of growth for nation building. Bandar Baru Nilai: USIM Publisher.

Ministry of Higher Education. (2006). Report by the committee to study, review and make recommendations concerning the development and direction of higher education in Malaysia. Shah Alam: University Publication Centre (UPENA).

Pang, V. (2014). Teaching and learning in higher education in Malaysia: Aspirations and realities. Paper presented at the seminar on higher education research policy, Penang.

Punch, K. F. (2005). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (1966). Investigation of factors which affect job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction of teachers. Journal of Management, 28(23), 25.

Wan, C. D., & Abdul Razak, A. (2015). Governance of higher education in Malaysia. In K. M. Joshi & S. Paivandi (Eds.), Global higher education: Issues in governance. Delhi: B. R. Publishing, pp. 339–379.

Wolf-Wendel, L. E., & Ward, K. (2005) Faculty life at comprehensives: Between a rock and a hard place. Paper presented at the annual conference of the association for the study of higher education, Philadelphia.