A study of critical attitude across English and Spanish academic book reviews

Journal of English for Academic Purposes - Tập 7 - Trang 15-26 - 2008
Ana I. Moreno1, Lorena Suárez2
1Instituto de Estudios Documentales sobre Ciencia y Tecnología (IEDCYT), CSIC, C/Joaquín Costa, 22, 28002 Madrid, Spain
2Departamento de Filología Moderna, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Campus de Vegazana s/n, 24071, León, Spain

Tài liệu tham khảo

Atkinson, 2004, Contrasting rhetorics/contrasting cultures: why contrastive rhetoric needs a better conceptualization of culture, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3, 277, 10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.002

Bhatia, 2004

Burgess, 2002, Packed houses and intimate gatherings: audience and rhetorical structure, 197

Butler, 2004, Corpus studies and functional linguistic theories, Functions of Language, 11, 147, 10.1075/fol.11.2.02but

Choulariaki, 1999

Connor, 2004, Introduction. Contrastive rhetoric: recent developments and relevance for English for Academic Purposes, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3, 271, 10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.001

Connor, 2005, Tertium comparationis: a vital component in contrastive research methodogy, 153

Fredrickson, 1994, Competition and discourse community: Introductions from ‘Nysvenska Studier’, 9

Gea Valor, 2000

Gómez, 2006, La I+D en España a través de sus publicaciones y patentes, 275

Hyland, 2000, Praise and criticism: interactions in book reviews, 41

Hyland, 2005

Hyland, 2005, Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse, Discourse Studies, 7, 173, 10.1177/1461445605050365

Johnson, 1992, Compliments and politeness in peer-review texts, Applied Linguistics, 13, 51, 10.1093/applin/13.1.51

Kaplan, 1987, Cultural thought patterns revisited, 9

Kramsch, 1993

Lindholm-Romantschuk, 1998

Martin, 2000, Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English, 142

Martin, 2003, Introduction, Text, 23, 171

Martin, 2005

Moreno, 2003, The role of cohesive devices as textual constraints on relevance: a discourse-as-process view, International Journal of English Studies, 3, 111

Salager-Meyer, 2006, From “Mr. Guthrie is profoundly mistaken.” to “Our data do not seem to confirm the results of a previous study on.”: a diachronic study of polemicity in academic writing (1810–1995), Ibérica, 1, 5

Salager-Meyer, 2004, Negative appraisals in academic book reviews: a cross-linguistic approach, 149

Sinclair, 1993, Written discourse structure, 6

Spink, 1998, Use of scholarly book reviews: implications for electronic publishing and scholarly communication, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 364, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<364::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-3

Suárez, 2008, The rhetorical structure of literary academic book reviews: an English–Spanish cross-linguistic approach, 147

Swales, 2004

Swales, 1994

Taylor, 1991, Linguistic, cultural, and subcultural issues in contrastive discourse analysis: Anglo-American and Chinese scientific texts, Applied Linguistics, 12, 319, 10.1093/applin/12.3.319

Thompson, 2000, Evaluation: an introduction, 1

Vande Kopple, 1985, Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse, College Composition and Communication, 36, 82, 10.2307/357609