Who wins in the Indian parliament election: Criminals, wealthy and incumbents?

Journal of Social and Economic Development - Tập 19 Số 2 - Trang 245-262 - 2017
P. Duraisamy1, Bruno Jérôme2
1University of Madras, Chepauk, Chennai, India
2Maîtres de Conférences sciences economiques, Universite Panthéon-Assas (Paris II), Paris, France

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aidt T, Golden M, Tiwari D (2011) Incumbents and criminals in the indian national legislature. Working paper version 5.0, Department of Political Science, University of California-Los Angeles

Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) (2014) Analysis of criminal and financial background details of Lok Sabha 2014 winners. http://adrindia.org/research-and-report/election-watch/lok-sabha/2014/lok-sabha-2014-winners-analysis-criminal-and-finan . Accessed 24 Apr 2017

Borooah VK (2006) Incumbency and parliamentary elections in India: an analysis of the congress party’s electoral performance, 1962–1999. Econ Polit Wkly 41(8):739–746

Chemin M (2008) Do criminal politicians reduce corruption? Evidence from India. Working paper 08-25, Department of Economics, University of Quebec at Montreal

Duraisamy P, Lemennicier B, Khouri M (2014) Incumbency disadvantage in the indian parliament elections, 2004 and 2009. J Quant Econ 12(1):12–30

Dutta B, Gupta P (2014) How do indian voters respond to candidates with criminal charges: evidence from the 2009 Lok Sabha elections. Econ Polit Wkly 49(4):43–51

Election Commission of India (2003) Statistical report on Lok Sabha elections. Election Commission of India, New Delhi

Gelman A, King G (1990) Estimating incumbency advantage without bias. Am J Polit Sci 34(4):1142–1164

Hainmueller J, Kern HL (2008) Incumbency as a source of spill over effects in mixed electoral systems: evidence from a regression-discontinuity design. Elect Stud 27(2):213–217

Jacobson GC (1987) The marginals never vanished: incumbency and competition in elections to the U.S. House of Representatives, 1952–82. Am J Polit Sci 31(1):126–141

Lee David S. (2008) Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections. Journal of Econometrics 142(2):675–697

Lemennicier B, Katir-Lescieux H (2010) Testing the accuracy of the Downs’ spatial voter model on forecasting the winners of the French parliamentary elections in May–June 2007. Int J Forecast 26(10):32–41

Levitt SD, Wolfram CD (1997) Decomposing the sources of incumbency advantage in the U.S. house. Legis Stud Q 22(1):45–60

Linden LL (2004) Are incumbents really advantaged? The preference for non-incumbents in Indian national elections. Columbia University, Mimeo

Ravishankar N (2009) The cost of ruling: anti-incumbency in elections. Econ Polit Wkly 44(10):92–98

Times of India (ToI) (2009) 300 crorepati MPs in new Lok, ToI, Chennai Edition, 18 May 2009

Uppal Y (2010) Estimation of incumbency effects in the US State legislatures: a quasi-experimental approach. Econ Polit 22(2):180–199

Uppal Y (2011) The disadvantaged Incumbents: estimating incumbency effects in Indian State Legislatures. Public Choice 138:9–27

Vaishnav M (2010) Caste politics, credibility and criminality: political selection in India. SSRN working paper, Columbia University

Yadav Y (2009) Between fortuna and virtu: explaining the congress’ ambiguous victory in 2009. Econ Polit Wkly 44(39):33–46