What Is Context For? Syntax in a Non-Abstract World

Journal of Logic, Language and Information - Tập 14 - Trang 235-251 - 2005
Tom Sgouros1
1Wickford, U.S.A.

Tóm tắt

An explanation for the uncertain progress of formalist linguistics is sought in an examination of the concept of syntax. The idea of analyzing language formally was made possible by developments in 20th century logic. It has been pointed out by many that the analogy between natural language and a formal system may be imperfect, but the objection made here is that the very concept of syntax, when applied to any non-abstract system of communication, is flawed as it is commonly used. Syntax is properly defined with respect to an individual transformation rule that might be applied to some message. Collections of syntax rules, however, are inevitably due to categories imposed by an observer, and do not correspond to functional features found in non-abstract systems. As such, these categories should not be relied upon as aids to understanding any natural system.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ancel, L.W., 2000, “Undermining the Baldwin expediting effect: Does phenotypic plasticity accelerate evolution?” Theoretical Population Biology 58, 307–319.

Anderson, R.W., 1995, “Learning and evolution: A quantitative genetics approach,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 175, 89–101.

Baldwin, J.M., 1896, “A new factor in evolution,” American Naturalist 30, 441–451.

Bar-Hillel, Y., 1953, “A quasi-arithmetical notation for syntactic description,” Language 29, 47–58.

Bar-Hillel, Y., 1954, “Logical syntax and semantics,” Language 30, 230–237.

Bar-Hillel, Y., 1964, Language and Information: Selected Essays on their Theory and Application, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Contains Bar-Hillel, 1953 and Bar-Hillel, 1954.

Bocheński, I.M., 1961, A History of Formal Logic, University of Notre Dame Press, Translated from the German edition of 1956 by Thomas Ivo.

Bresnan, J. (ed.), 1982, The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Brillouin, L., 1962, Science and Information Theory, 2nd edition, New York: Academic Press.

Carnap, R., 1937, The Logical Syntax of Language, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Chaitin, G.J., 1982, “GÖdel’s theorem and information,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics 22, 941–954.

Cheney, D.L. and Seyfarth, R.M., 1990, How Monkeys See The World: Inside the Mind of Another Species, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Cherry, C., 1978, On Human Communication, 3rd edition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N., 1995, The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N., 2000, New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cornillon, P., Gallagher, J., and Sgouros, T., 2003, “OPeNDAP: Accessing data in a distributed, heterogeneous environment,” CODATA Data Science Journal 2, 164–174. Online 5 November, 2003: http://journals.eecs.qub.ac.uk/codata/Journal/contents/2_03/2_03pdfs/DS247.pdf

Deacon, T.W., 1997, The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Brain, New York: W. W. Norton.

Dupuy, J.-P., 2001, The Mechanization of the Mind: On the Origins of Cognitive Science, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Translated from French (1994) by M.B. DeBevoise.

Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., Masinter, L., Leach, P., and Berners-Lee, T., 1999, Hypertext Transfer Protocol – HTTP/1.1, RFC 2616, Network Working Group.

Fodor, J.A., 1994, The Elm and the Expert: Mentalese and its Semantics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Graffi, G., 2001, 200 Years of Syntax: A Critical Survey, Vol. 98 of Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Hartley, R.V.L., 1928, “Transmittion of information,” Bell System Technical Journal 7, 535– 563.

IEC, 1994, “Information technology – Open Systems Interconnection – Basic Reference Model: The Basic Model – ISO/IEC 7498,” Technical report, International Electrotechnical Commission.

IHGSC, 2001, “Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome,” Nature 409, 860–921.

Jackendoff, R., 2002, Foundations of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Montague, R., 1970a, “English as a formal language,” in Linguaggi nella societ’,a e nella tecnica, B. Visentini ed., Milan: Edizioni di Comunit’,a.

Montague, R., 1970b, “Universal grammar,” Theoria 36, 373–398.

Papaj, D.R., 1993, “Automatic behavior and the evolution of instinct: Lessons from learning in Parasitoids,” in Insect Learning: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives, D.R. Papaj and A.C. Lewis eds., New York: Chapman & Hall, Chapter 10, pp. 243–272.

Pollard, C. and Sag, I.A., 1994, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Resnick, P., 2001, Internet Message Format, RFC 2822, Network Working Group.

Rogers, J., 1999, A Descriptive Approach to Language-Theoretic Complexity, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Shannon, C.E., 1948, “A mathematical theory of communication,” Bell System Technical Journal 27, 379–423, 623–656.

Shapiro, J.A., 1999, “Genome system architecture and natural genetic engineering in evolution,” in Molecular Strategies in Biological Evolution, L. Caporale ed., Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 870, 23–35.

Stevens, W.R., 1999, UNIX Network Programming, 2nd edition, New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Turkel, W.J., 2002, “The learning guided evolution of language,” Chapter 8, pp. 235–254 in Linguistic Evolution Through Language Acquisition, T. Briscoe ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Waddington, C., 1961, “Genetic assimilation,” Advances in Genetics 10, 257–293.

Warren, E., 1964, Report of the President’s Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

Wiener, N., 1961, Cybernetics, 2nd edition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Logic, Language and Information

Tập 14

235-251

Thông tin tác giả