Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England

Health Economics (United Kingdom) - Tập 27 Số 1 - Trang 7-22 - 2018
Nancy Devlin1,2, Koonal Shah1, Yan Feng1, Brendan Mulhern3,2, Ben van Hout2
1Office of Health Economics, London, UK
2School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
3Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Augustovski, 2016, An EQ-5D-5L value set based on Uruguayan population preferences, Quality of Life Research, 25, 323, 10.1007/s11136-015-1086-4

Bansback, 2012, Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values, Journal of Health Economics, 31, 306, 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.11.004

Brazier, 2017, Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation

Brazier, 2002, The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36, Journal of Health Economics, 21, 271, 10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00130-8

CADTH [Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health], 2006, Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies: Canada [3rd edition]

Cambridgeshire Community Services NHS Trust Quality Account 2013 http://www.nhs.uk/Services/Trusts/Overview/DefaultView.aspx?id=1118 th

Devlin, 2010, Getting the most out of PROMs: Putting health outcomes at the heart of NHS decision making

Devlin, 2017, EQ-5D and the EuroQol group: Past, present, future, Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 15, 127, 10.1007/s40258-017-0310-5

Devlin, 2013, A comparison of alternative variants of the lead and lag time TTO, Health Economics, 22, 517, 10.1002/hec.2819

Devlin, 2011, A uniform time trade off method for states better and worse than dead: Feasibility study of the ‘lead time’ approach, Health Economics, 20, 348, 10.1002/hec.1596

Dolan, 1997, Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states, Medical Care, 35, 1095, 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002

Engel, 2016, Exclusion criteria in national health state valuation studies: A systematic review, Medical Decision Making, 36, 798, 10.1177/0272989X15595365

Fayers, 2016, Quality of Life-The assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes

Feng, 2017, New methods for modelling EQ-5D-5L value sets: An application to English data, Health Economics, 27, 23, 10.1002/hec.3560

2016, Health Survey for England 2015

Herdman, 2011, Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L), Quality of Life Research, 20, 1727, 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x

Hernández Alava, 2012, Tails from the Peak District: Adjusted limited dependent variable mixture models of EQ-5D questionnaire health state utility values, Value in Health, 15, 550, 10.1016/j.jval.2011.12.014

Hernandez-Villafuerte, 2014, Do NICE decisions affect decisions in other countries?, Value in Health, 17, A418, 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1020

Janssen, 2013, Introducing the composite TTO: A test of feasibility and face validity, European Journal of Health Economics, 14, 5, 10.1007/s10198-013-0503-2

Janssen, 2011, The use of the EQ-5D preference-based health status measure in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus, Diabetes Medicine, 28, 395, 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03136.x

Kim, 2016, The EQ-5D-5L valuation study in Korea, Quality of Life Research, 25, 1845, 10.1007/s11136-015-1205-2

Longworth, 2014, Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: Systematic review, statistical modelling and survey, Health Technology Assessment, 18, 10.3310/hta18090

Mulhern, 2014, Preparatory study for the revaluation of the EQ-5D tariff: Methodology report, Health Technology Assessment, 18, 10.3310/hta18120

Mulhern, 2017, Comparing the UK EQ-5D-3L and the English EQ-5D-5L value sets. OHE Research Paper

2017, Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine

NHS [National Health Service], 2016, GP patient survey: National summary report

NICE [National Institute for Health and Care Excellence], 2013, Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013

Office for National Statistics 2011 Census: Digitised boundary data (England and Wales) [computer file] http://edina.ac.uk/ukborders th

Oppe, 2014, A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol, Value in Health, 17, 445, 10.1016/j.jval.2014.04.002

Oppe, 2016, EuroQol protocols for time trade-off valuation of health outcomes, PharmacoEconomics, 34, 993, 10.1007/s40273-016-0404-1

Oppe, 2010, 27th Scientific Plenary Meeting of the EuroQol Group Proceedings, Athens Greece, September 2010

Parkin, 2016, What determines the shape of an EQ-5D index distribution?, Medicinal Decision Making, 36, 941, 10.1177/0272989X16645581

PBAC [Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee], 2016, Guidelines for preparing a submission to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee

Pickard, 2007, Health utilities using the EQ-5D in studies of cancer, PharmacoEconomics, 25, 365, 10.2165/00019053-200725050-00002

Ramos-Goñi, 2014, Valuation and modeling of EQ-5D-5L health states using a hybrid approach, Medical Care

Richardson, 2014, Encyclopedia of health economics, 341, 10.1016/B978-0-12-375678-7.00505-8

Robinson, 2002, Recognising diversity in public preferences: The use of preference sub-groups in cost-effectiveness analysis. A response to Sculpher and Gafni, Health Economics, 11, 649, 10.1002/hec.735

Robinson, 2006, Exploring challenges to TTO utilities: Valuing states worse than dead, Health Economics, 15, 393, 10.1002/hec.1069

Rowen, 2014, A comparison of methods for converting DCE values onto the Full Health-Dead QALY Scale, Medical Decision Making, 35, 328, 10.1177/0272989X14559542

Ryan, 2008, Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care, 10.1007/978-1-4020-5753-3

Sculpher, 2001, Recognising diversity in public preferences: The use of preference sub-groups in cost-effectiveness analysis, Health Economics, 10, 314, 10.1002/hec.592

Shah, 2013, One-to-one versus group settings for conducting computer assisted TTO studies: Findings from pilot studies in England and the Netherlands, European Journal of Health Economics, 14, S65, 10.1007/s10198-013-0509-9

Szende, 2007, EQ-5D value sets: Inventory, comparative review and user guide, 10.1007/1-4020-5511-0

Tilling, 2010, TTO valuations of health states worse than dead: A literature review and conceptual framework for systematic analysis, Medical Decision Making, 30, 610, 10.1177/0272989X09357475

Hout, 2012, Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: Mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets, Value in Health, 15, 708, 10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008

Versteegh, 2016, Dutch tariff for the five-level version of EQ-5D, Value in Health, 19, 343, 10.1016/j.jval.2016.01.003

Wailoo, 2010, The incorporation of health benefits in CUA using EQ-5D

Xie, 2015, A checklist for reporting valuation studies of multi-attribute utility-based instruments (CREATE), PharmacoEconomics, 33, 867, 10.1007/s40273-015-0292-9

Xie, 2016, A time trade-off-derived value set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada, Medical Care, 54, 98, 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000447