Đánh giá các hoạt động nông nghiệp do sinh viên dẫn dắt tại trường đại học: so sánh giữa sẵn sàng trả tiền và giá trị suy diễn

Ryo Sakurai1, Takuro Uehara1
1College of Policy Science, Ritsumeikan University, 2-150, Iwakuracho, Ibaraki, Osaka, 567-8570, Japan

Tóm tắt

Tóm tắtCác cánh đồng nông nghiệp trong khuôn viên trường đại học có thể cải thiện sự an ninh dinh dưỡng đô thị, tăng lượng cây xanh và cung cấp cơ hội cho sinh viên trồng cây cũng như nâng cao kỹ năng tự quản lý. Chúng tôi đã thực hiện khảo sát sinh viên giữa các sinh viên năm nhất trong hai năm khác nhau (2016 và 2020) để hiểu rõ hơn về mức độ sẵn sàng trả tiền (WTP) của họ đối với việc quyên góp cho các hoạt động nông nghiệp do sinh viên dẫn dắt. Để giảm thiểu thiên lệch về mong muốn xã hội, chúng tôi cũng đã hỏi về WTP suy diễn của sinh viên và so sánh nó với WTP thông thường. Chúng tôi nhận thấy rằng các giá trị suy diễn có thể xác định được những ước lượng bảo thủ và thực tế hơn về các khoản quyên góp của sinh viên so với WTP thông thường. Phân tích hồi quy mô hình đầy đủ sử dụng ước lượng mô hình logit cho thấy rằng sự quan tâm và tham gia của sinh viên vào các hành vi thân thiện với môi trường làm tăng WTP cho các hoạt động nông nghiệp do sinh viên dẫn dắt. Tóm lại, các dự án như vậy là khả thi về mặt kinh tế thông qua sự quyên góp của sinh viên.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bliem M, Getzner M (2012) Willingness-to-pay for river restoration: differences across time and scenarios. Environ Econ Policy Stud 14(3):241–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-012-0029-3

Boyle KJ (2003) Contigent valuation in practice. In: Champ PA, Boyle KJ, Brown TC (eds) A primer on nonmarket valuation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 111–169

Champ PA (2003) Collecting survey data for nonmarket valuation. In: Champ PA, Boyle KJ, Brown TC (eds) A primer on nonmarket valuation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 59–98

Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK (2014) Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob Environ Change 26:152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002

Entem A, Lloyd-Smith P, Adamowicz WL, Boxall PC (2022) Using inferred valuation to quantify survey and social desirability bias in stated preference research. Am J Agr Econ 104(4):1224–1242. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12268

Epley N, Dunning D (2000) Feeling “holier than thou”: are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction? J Pers Soc Psychol 79(6):861–875. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.861

Freeman AM III (2003) Economic valuation: what and why. In: Champ PA, Boyle KJ, Brown TC (eds) A primer on nonmarket valuation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 1–25

Freeman AM III, Herriges JA, Kling CL (2014) The measurement of environmental resource values: theory and methods, 3rd edn. RFF Press, Oxford

Inui Y (2007) The learning process and the results of a students leading project “a solution to control smoking at the college campus of Ibaraki University.” Stud Teach Strateg (ibaraki University) 26:117–126 (in Japanese)

Japanese Circulation Society (2016) Impact of smoking on health and effects of quitting smoking. http://www.j-circ.or.jp/kinen/iryokankei/eikyo.htm. Accessed 6 June 2016 (in Japanese)

Kanie N, Griggs D, Young O, Waddell S, Shrivastava P, Haas PM, Broadgate W, Gaffney O, Kőrösi C (2019) Rules to goals: emergence of new governance strategies for sustainable development. Sustain Sci 14(6):1745–1749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00729-1

KASA Sustainability (n.d.) Campus farming and composting. https://ja.kasasustainability.org/action/campus-farming-and-composting. Accessed 5 Jan 2022

Konakayama A, Sato N (2004) An empirical study on the relationship between an environment improvement project evaluation and people’s concerns for environment problems: based on a survey for residents around Tokai Shonan Campus area and Tokai University students. J School Polit Sci Econ Tokai Univ 36:107–125 (in Japanese)

Lopez-Becerra EI, Alcon F (2021) Social desirability bias in the environmental economic valuation: an inferred valuation approach. Ecol Econ 184:106988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106988

Lusk JL, Norwood FB (2009) An inferred valuation method. Land Econ 85(3):500–514. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.85.3.500

Mori R, Ohno E, Morisugi M, Sao H (2013) Environmental economic valuation by CVM consistent with TCM: measurement of use and non-use values of Shirakami Mountain Range. Infrastruct Plan Manag 69(5):137–144. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejipm.69.I_137. (in Japanese with English abstract)

Newton P, Civita N, Frankel-Goldwater L, Bartel K, Johns C (2020) What is regenerative agriculture? a review of scholar and practitioner definitions based on processes and outcomes. Front Sustain Food Syst 4:577723. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.577723

Osaka City (2021) Minimum wage in Osaka Prefecture. https://www.city.osaka.lg.jp/shimin/page/0000410285.html. Accessed 2 Sept 2022 (in Japanese)

Oshida Y, Numata D (2016) Benefit of species extinct in the wild to come back with contingent valuation method and input-output analysis. Environ Sci 29(1):17–25. https://doi.org/10.11353/sesj.29.17. (in Japanese with English abstract)

Pevec I, Shava S, Nzira J, Barnett M (2017) Urban agriculture. In: Russ A, Krasny ME (eds) Urban environmental education review. Cornell University Press, New York, pp 242–250

Planet (2021) Bringing my bag became more common as stores started to charge for plastic bags. https://www.planet-van.co.jp/pdf/fromplanet/fromplanet_153.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2022 (in Japanese)

Pustika R (2020) Future English teachers’ perspective towards the implementatation of E-learning in Covid-19 pandemic era. J Eng Lang Teach Linguist 5(3):383–391. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v5i3.448

Russ A, Gaus MB (2021) Urban agriculture education and youth civic engagement in the US: a scoping review. Front Sustain Food Syst 5:707896. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.707896

Sakurai R, Uehara T (2017) Contingent valuation study regarding placing campus patrol for reducing smoking at a university: applying inferred valuation approach to students. Int J Ecol Econ Stat 38(2):124–140

Sakurai R, Uehara T, Yoshioka T (2023) Content analysis of newspaper articles regarding SDGs. Kyosei Studies 17(1). (in Japanese with English abstract)

Silva P, Ramirez RL (2018) Making knowledge in civic ecology practices: a community garden case study. In: Krasny ME (ed) Grassroots to global: broader impacts of civic ecology. Cornell University Press, New York, pp 124–140

Take M, Iida A (2016) A study on the relationships between willingness to pay for environmental protection and tourist satisfaction. Landsc Res Jpn 79(5):495–500. https://doi.org/10.5632/jila.79.495(inJapanesewithEnglishabstract)

Tam K, Chan H (2018) Generalized trust narrows the gap between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior: multilevel evidence. Glob Environ Change 48:182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.12.001

Tan GCI, Lee JC, Chang T, Kim C (2017) Four Asian tigers. In: Russ A, Krasny ME (eds) Urban environmental education review. Cornell University Press, New York, pp 31–38

Tanaka K, Nagahiro S (2019) Comparison of subjective and inferred valuation for forest ecosystem service. Rev Environ Econ Policy Stud 12(1):44–58. https://doi.org/10.14927/reeps.12.1_44. (in Japanese)

Tollefson J (2020) Why deforestation and extinctions make pandemics more likely. Nature 584(7820):175–176. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02341-1

Uehara T, Sakurai R (2021) Have Sustainable Development Goal depictions functioned as a nudge for the younger generation before and during the COVID-19 outbreak? Sustainability 13(4):1672. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041672

Uehara T, Tsuge T, Ota T (2018) Long-term evolution of preferences for conservation projects in the Seto Inland Sea, Japan: a comprehensive analytic framework. PeerJ 6:e5366. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5366

Yadav L, van Rensburg TM, Kelley H (2013) A comparison between the conventional stated preference technique and an inferred valuation approach. J Agric Econ 64(2):405–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2012.00375.x