University of Alberta norms of relative meaning frequency for 566 homographs
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Attneave, F. (1954)Applications of information theory to psychology New York. Henry Holt.
Barclay, J. R., Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., McCarrell N. S, &Nitsch, K (1974). Comprehension and semantic flexibilrtyJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,13, 471–481
Barsalou, L W (1982). Context-independent and context-depentdent information in conceptsMemory & Cognition,10, 82–93.
Britton, B. K (1979) Lexical ambiguity of words used in English text.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,10, 1–7
Carpenter, P.A., &Daneman, M. (1981). Lexical retrieval and error recovery in reading: A model based on eye fixations.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 137–160.
Cramer, P. (1970). A study of homographs. In L. Postman & G. Keppel (Eds.),Norms of word association. New York: Academic Press.
Drysdale, P. (1991).Collins pocket reference English dictionary. Glasgow: Harper Collins.
Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., &Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 429–446.
Ferraro, F. R., &Kellas, G. (1990). Normative data for number of word meanings.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,22, 491–498.
Frazier, L., &Rayner, K. (1987). Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities: Eye movements in parsing lexically ambiguous sentences.Journal of Memory & Language,26,505–5266.
Geis, M. F., &Winograd, E. (1974). Norms of semantic encoding variability for fifty homographs.Bulletin of the Psyehonomic Society,3, 429–431.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Lode, R. H. (1980). Meaning-dependent ratings of imagery, age of acquisition, familiarity, and concreteness for 387 ambiguous words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 428–450.
Gorfein, D. S., Viviani, J. M., &Leddo, J. (1982). Norms as a tool for the study of homography.Memory & Cognition,10, 503–509.
Hogaboam, T. W., &Perfetti, C. A. (1975). Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 265–274.
Kausler, D. H., &Kollasch, S. F. (1970). Word associations to homographs.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,9, 444–449.
Kellas, G., Paul, S. T., Martin, M., &Simpson, G. (1991). Contextual feature activation and meaning access. In G. B. Simpson (Ed.),Understanding word and sentence (pp. 47–71). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Neill, W. T. (1989). Lexical ambiguity and context: An activations uppression model. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.),Resolving semantic ambiguity (pp. 63–83). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Neill W. T., Hilliard, D. V., &Cooper, E. (1988). The detection of lexical ambiguity: Evidence for context-sensitive parallel access.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 279–287.
Neill, W. T., &Klein, R. M. (1989). Reflexions on modularity and connectionism. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.),Resolving semantic ambiguity (pp. 276–293). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., Walling, J. R., &Wheeler, J. W. (1980). The University of South Florida homograph norms.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 16–37.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., &Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, emagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,76(1, Pt. 2), 1–25.
Perfetti, C. A., Lindsay, R., &Garson, B. (1971).Association and uncertainty: Norms of association to ambiguous words. Pittsburgh: Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh.
Prather, P. A., &Swinney, D. A. (1988). Lexical processing and ambiguity resolution: An autonomous process in an interactive box. In S. I. Small, G. W. Comell, & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.),Lexical ambiguity resolution (pp. 289–310). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Rayner, K., &Frazier, L. (1989). Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 779–790.
Rayner, K., &Morris, R. K. (1991). Comprehension processes in reading ambiguous sentences: Reflections from eye movements. In G. B. Simpson (Ed.),Understanding word and sentence (pp. 175–198). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Seidenberg, M. S., Tanenhaus, I. K., Leiman, T. M., &Bienkowshi, M. (1982). Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing.Cognitive Psychology,14, 489–537.
Simpson, G. B. (1984). Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition.Psychological Bulletin,96, 316–340.
Simpson, G. H. (1989). Varieties of ambiguity: What are we seeking? In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.),Resolving semantic ambiguity (pp. 13–21). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Simpson, G. B., &Burgess, C. (1985). Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 28–39.
Simpson, G. B., &Burgess, C. (1988). Implications of lexical ambiguity resolution for word recognition and comprehension. In S. I. Small, G. W. Cottrell, & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.),Lexical ambiguity resolution (pp. 271–288). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Swinney, D. A. (1991). The resolution of indeterminacy during language comprehension: Perspectives on modularity in lexical, structural, and pragmatic processing. In G. B. Simpson (Ed.),Understanding word and sentence (pp. 367–385). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Tabossi P., Colombo, L., &Job, R. (1987). Accessing lexical ambiguity: Effects of contextand dominance.Psychological Research,49, 161–167.
Twilley, L. C., & Dixon, P. (1992).Enhancement and suppression of homograph meanings. Unpublished manuscript.
Warren, R. E., Bresnick, J. H., &Green, J. P. (1972). Definitional dominance distributions for 20 English homographs.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,10, 229–231.
Woolen, K. A., Cox, S. D., Coahran, M. M., Shea, D. S., &Kirby, R. F. (1980). Frequency of occurrence and concreteness ratings of homograph meanings.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 8–15.