Understanding social demand for sustainable nature conservation. The case of a protected natural space in South-Eastern Spain

Journal for Nature Conservation - Tập 51 - Trang 125722 - 2019
Francisco Alcon1, José A. Albaladejo-García2, José A. Zabala1, Cristina Marín-Miñano1, José M. Martínez-Paz2
1Business Economics Department, ETSIA, Polytechnic University of Cartagena, Paseo Alfonso XIII, 48, 30203, Cartagena, Spain
2Applied Economics Department, Faculty of Economics, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30100, Murcia, Spain

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adams, 2007, People, parks and poverty: political ecology and biodiversity conservation, Conservation and Society, 5, 147

Angelstam, 2019, Model forests in Russia as landscape approach: Demonstration projects or initiatives for learning towards sustainable forest management?, Forest Policy and Economics, 101, 96, 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.005

Barreiro-Hurle, 2018, Choosing not to choose: A meta-analysis of status quo effects in environmental valuations using choice experiments, Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales, 18, 79, 10.7201/earn.2018.01.04

Barrio, 2013, The impact of protest responses in choice experiments: An application to a Biosphere Reserve Management Program, Forest Systems, 22, 94, 10.5424/fs/2013221-03103

Bateman, 2002

Bennett, 1999

Bennett, 2001

Blamey, 2000, A test of policy labels in environmental choice modelling studies, Ecological Economics, 32, 269, 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00101-9

Bonet-García, 2015, Protected areas as elicitors of human well-being in a developed region: A new synthetic (socioeconomic) approach, Biological Conservation, 187, 221, 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.027

Boyd, 2007, What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units, Ecological Economics, 63, 616, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002

Brander, 2011, The value of urban open space: Meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results, Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 2763, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.019

Caracuel, 2006, Jurassic biostratigraphy and paleoenvironmental evolution of the Malaguide complex from Sierra Espuña (Internal Betic Zone, SE Spain), Geobios, 39, 25, 10.1016/j.geobios.2004.09.002

CARM, 2017

Chaikaew, 2017, Estimating the value of ecosystem services in a mixed-used watershed: A choice experiment approach, Ecosystem Services, 23, 228, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.015

Chen, 2017, Accounting for ecosystem services in compensating for the costs of effective conservation in protected areas, Biological Conservation, 215, 233, 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.09.013

Costanza, 2017, Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?, Ecosystem Services, 28, 1, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008

Delibes-Mateos, 2014, Does hunters’ willingness to pay match the best hunting options for biodiversity conservation? A choice experiment application for small-game hunting in Spain, Biological Conservation, 177, 36, 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.004

Díaz, 2014, Análisis de las incidencias en encuestas presenciales: mejoras en el trabajo de campo, Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 145, 43

Díez, 2015, Evaluating participatory processes in conservation policy and governance: Lessons from a Natura 2000 pilot case study, Environmental Policy and Governance, 25, 125, 10.1002/eet.1667

Esteve, 2012

Etxano, 2015, A participatory integrated assessment approach for Natura 2000 network sites, Environment and Planning C Politics and Space, 33, 1207, 10.1177/0263774X15612318

Ferranti, 2017, Discourses on sustainable forest management and effects of Natura 2000: A case study of Catalonia, NE Spain, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60, 2085, 10.1080/09640568.2016.1274254

González, 2019, Preferences for sustainable mobility in natural areas: The case of Teide National Park, Journal of Transport Geography, 76, 42, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.03.002

Guimarães, 2014, Using Choice modeling to estimate the effects of environmental improvements on local development: When the purpose modifies the tool, Ecological Economics, 108, 79, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.015

Hausman, 1984, Specification tests for the multinomial logit model, Econometrica, 52, 1219, 10.2307/1910997

Hensher, 2005

Hole, 2007, A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures, Health Economics, 16, 827, 10.1002/hec.1197

Hole, 2007, Fitting mixed logit models by using maximum simulated likelihood, The Stata Journal, 7, 388, 10.1177/1536867X0700700306

Hoyos, 2010, The state of art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments, Ecological Economics, 69, 1595, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.011

Hoyos, 2012, Valuing a Natura 2000 network site to inform land use options using a discrete choice experiment: An illustration from the Basque Country, Journal of Forest Economics, 18, 329, 10.1016/j.jfe.2012.05.002

INE, 2015

INE, 2015

INE, 2015

INE, 2015

Kaffashi, 2012, Economic valuation and conservation: Do people vote for better preservation of Shadegan International Wetland?, Biological Conservation, 150, 150, 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.02.019

Kettunen, 2013

Kovac, 2018, Biodiversity in (the Natura 2000) forest habitats is not static: Its conservation calls for an active management approach, Journal for Nature Conservation, 43, 250, 10.1016/j.jnc.2017.07.004

Lancaster, 1966, A new approach to consumer theory, The Journal of Political Economy, 74, 132, 10.1086/259131

Liu, 2015, Systems integration for global sustainability, Science, 347, 10.1126/science.1258832

Louviere, 2000

Maloney, 1975, A revised scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge, The American Psychologist, 30, 787, 10.1037/h0084394

Martín-Lopez, 2007, Influence of user characteristics on valuation of ecosystem services in Doñana Natural Protected Area (south-west Spain), Environmental Conservation, 34, 215, 10.1017/S0376892907004067

Martínez-Paz, 2012, El Parque regional de Sierra Espuña: Valor económico y políticas de gestión, 283

Martinez-Paz, 2016, Pooling expert opinion on environmental discounting: An international Delphi survey, Conservation and Society, 14, 243, 10.4103/0972-4923.191162

MCPFE, 1993

Nagel, 2017, Evaluating the influence of integrative forest management on old-growth habitat structures in a temperate forest region, Biological Conservation, 216, 101, 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.008

Newig, 2007, Does public participation in environmental decisions lead to improved environmental quality? Towards an analytical framework, Communication, Cooperation, Participation, 1, 51

Nunes, 2003

Nunes, 2009, Comparing tax and tax reallocation payments in financing rail noise abatement programmes: Results from a stated choice valuation study in Italy, Environmental & Resource Economics, 4, 503, 10.1007/s10640-008-9243-7

Perni, 2012, Social preferences and economic valuation for water quality and river restoration: The Segura River, Spain, Water and Environment Journal., 26, 274, 10.1111/j.1747-6593.2011.00286.x

Perni, 2012, Contexto social de la valoración económica de parques regionales en la Región de Murcia, 241

Petersen, 2016, Conserving what, where and how? Cost-efficient measures to conserve biodiversity in Denmark, Journal for Nature Conservation, 29, 33, 10.1016/j.jnc.2015.10.004

Riera, 2012, Non-market valuation of forest goods and services: Good practice guidelines, Journal of Forest Economics, 18, 259, 10.1016/j.jfe.2012.07.001

Robledano, 2018, Multi-criteria assessment of a proposed ecotourism, environmental education and research infrastructure in a unique lagoon ecosystem: The Encañizadas del Mar Menor (Murcia, SE Spain), Journal for Nature Conservation, 43, 201, 10.1016/j.jnc.2017.10.007

Sarmento, 2017, Human visitation limits the utility of protected areas as ecological baselines, Biological Conservation, 212, 316, 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.06.032

Train, 2003

Vecchiato, 2013, Valuing the benefits of an afforestation project in a peri-urban area with choice experiments, Forest Policy and Economics, 26, 111, 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.10.001

Weller, 2018, Preferences for forest structural attributes in Germany – Evidence from a choice experiment, Forest Policy and Economics, 93, 1, 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.04.013

Wesselink, 2011, Rationales for public participation in environmental policy and governance: Practitioners’ perspectives, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space., 43, 2688, 10.1068/a44161