Underdetermination, Model-ensembles and Surprises: On the Epistemology of Scenario-analysis in Climatology

Gregor Betz1
1(Universität Stuttgart)

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Albert, M. (2003). Bayesian rationality and decision making: A critical review. Analyse & Kritik, 25, 101–117.

Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft-Auf dem Weg in die Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Betz, G. (2006). Prediction or prophecy? The boundaries of economic foreknowledge and their socio-political consequences. Wiesbaden: DUV.

Betz, G. (2007). Probabilities in climate policy advice: A critical comment. Climatic Change, 85(1–2), 1–9.

Carrier, M. (2006). Wissenschaftstheorie zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.

Cartwright, N. (1999). The dappled world: A study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Crawford, E. (1997). Arrhenius’ 1896 model of the greenhouse effect in context. Ambio, 26(1), 6–11.

Dessai, S., & Hulme, M. (2003). Does climate policy need probabilities? Working Paper 34. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.

Edwards, P. N. (2001). Representing the global atmosphere: Computer models, data, and knowledge about climate change. In Miller and Edwards (2001), pp. 31–66.

European Environmental Agency. (2001). Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896–2000. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Gardiner, S. M. (2006). A core precautionary principle. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(1), 33–60.

Gillies, D. (2000). Philosophical theories of probability. London: Routledge.

Harsanyi, J. C. (1975). Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality? A critique of John Rawls’ theory. The American Political Science Review, 69, 594–606.

Howson, C., & Urbach, P. (1993). Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach (Vol. 2). Chicago: Open Court.

Humphreys, P. (2004). Extending ourselves: Computational science, empiricism, and scientific method. New York: Oxford University Press.

IPCC. (2001). Climate Change 2001: The scientific basis; contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

IPCC. (2007). Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis; contribution of working group i to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kitcher, P. (2001). Science, truth, and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Knight, F. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin.

Kuhn, T. S. (1977). Objectivity, value judgement, and theory choice. In T. S. Kuhn (Ed.), The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change (pp. 320–329). Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Laudan, L. (1991). Empirical equivalence and underdetermination. The Journal of Philosophy, LXXXVIII(9), 449–472.

Lempert, R., Nakicenovic, N., et al. (2004). Characterizing climate-change uncertainties for decision-makers—An editorial essay. Climatic Change, 65(1–2), 1–9.

Lenhard, J. (2007). Computer simulation: The cooperation between experimenting and modeling. Philosophy of Science, 74, 176–194.

Lorius, C., Jouzel, J., Raynaud, D., Hansen, J., & Le Treut, H. (1990). The ice-core record: Climate sensitivity and future greenhouse warming. Nature, 347, 139–145.

Mayo, D. (1996). Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

McGuffie, K., & Henderson-Sellers, A. (2001). Forty years of numerical climate modelling. International Journal of Climatology, 21, 1067–1109.

Miller, C. A., & Edwards, P. N. (Eds.). (2001). Changing the atmosphere: Expert knowledge and environmental governance. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Morgan, M. G., & Keith, D. W. (1995). Climate-change—Subjective judgments by climate experts. Environmental Science and Technology, 29, A468–A476.

Morgan, M., & Morrison, M. (Eds.). (1999). Models as mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Norton, S. D., & Suppe, F. (2001). Why atmospheric modeling is good science. In Miller and Edwards (2001), pp. 67–106.

Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., & Belitz, K. (1994). Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in earth sciences. Science, 263, 641–646.

Parker, W. S. (2006). Understanding pluralism in climate modeling. Foundations of Science, 11, 349–368.

Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Quine, W. V. O. (1953). Two dogmas of empiricism. In W. Van Orman Quine (Ed.), From a logical point of view, chapter 2 (pp. 20–46). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Shackle, G. L. S. (1949). Expectations in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shackley, S. (2001). Epistemic lifestyles in climate change modeling. In Miller and Edwards (2001), pp. 107–134.

Siegenthaler, U., Stocker, T. F., Monnin, E., Lüthi, D., Schwander, J., Stauffer, B., et al. (2005). Stable carbon cycle? Climate relationship during the late Pleistocene. Science, 310(5752), 1313–1317.

Stainforth, D. A., Aina, T., et al. (2005). Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature, 433(7024), 403–406.

Tetens, H. (2006). Selbstreflexive Physik. Transzendentale Begründungen am Beispiel des Strukturenrealismus. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 54(3), 431–448.

Tetens, H. (2007). Einstein als Philosoph. In P. W. Balsinger & R. Kötter (Eds.), Die Kultur moderner Wissenschaft am Beispiel Albert Einsteins. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.

United Nations. (1992). Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (A/CONF.151/26).

Weart, S. R. (2003). The discovery of global warming. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Webster, M. D., Forest, C. E., Reilly, J., Babikerand, M., Kicklighter, D., Mayer, M., et al. (2003). Uncertainty analysis of climatic change and policy responses. Climatic Change, 61(3), 295–320.

Winsberg, E. (2003). Simulated experiments: Methodology for a virtual world. Philosophy of Science, 70, 105–125.

Winsberg, E. (2006). Models of success vs. the success of models: Reliability without truth. Synthese, 152, 1–19.

Zickfeld, K., Levermann, A., Granger Morgan, M., Kuhlbrodt, T., Rahmstorf, S., & Keith, D. W. (2007). Present state and future fate of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation as viewed by experts. Climatic Change, 82, 235–265.