Two-year clinical, angiographic, and serial optical coherence tomographic follow-up after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold and an everolimus-eluting metallic stent: insights from the randomised ABSORB Japan trial

EuroIntervention - Tập 12 Số 9 - Trang 1090-1101 - 2016
Yoshinobu Onuma1, Yohei Sotomi, Hiroki Shiomi, Yukio Ozaki, Atsuro Namiki, Satoshi Yasuda, Takafumi Ueno, Kenji Andò, Jungo Furuya, Keiichi Igarashi, Ken Kozuma, Kengo Tanabe, Hajime Kusano, Richard Rapoza, Jeffrey J. Popma, Gregg W. Stone, Charles A. Simonton, Patrick W. Serruys, Takeshi Kimura
1Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Serruys PW., 2012, From metallic cages to transient bioresorbable scaffolds: change in paradigm of coronary revascularization in the upcoming decade?, Eur Heart J., 33, 16b, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr384

Serruys PW., 2015, A bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de-novo native coronary artery lesions (ABSORB II): an interim 1-year analysis of clinical and procedural secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial., Lancet., 385, 43, 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61455-0

Ellis SG., 2015, Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Coronary Artery Disease., N Engl J Med., 373, 1905, 10.1056/NEJMoa1509038

Gao R., 2015, Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Metallic Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB China Trial., J Am Coll Cardiol., 66, 2298, 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.054

Kimura T., 2015, A randomized trial evaluating everolimus-eluting Absorb bioresorbable scaffolds vs. everolimus-eluting metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease: ABSORB Japan., Eur Heart J., 36, 3332, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv435

Stone GW., 2016, 1-year outcomes with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold in patients with coronary artery disease: a patient-level, pooled meta-analysis., Lancet., 387, 1277, 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01039-9

Chevalier B., 2016 Aug 27., Randomised comparison of a bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold with a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de novo native coronary artery lesions: the 2-year clinical outcomes of the ABSORB II trial., EuroIntervention., Epub AOP

Karanasos A., 2015, Angiographic and optical coherence tomography insights into bioresorbable scaffold thrombosis: single-center experience., Circ Cardiovasc Interv., 8, 5, 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002369

Raber L., 2015, Very Late Scaffold Thrombosis: Intracoronary Imaging and Histopathological and Spectroscopic Findings., J Am Coll Cardiol., 66, 1901, 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.853

Räber L., 2016, Arterial healing following primary PCI using the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS) versus the durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stent (XIENCE) in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the randomised TROFI II study., EuroIntervention., 12, 482, 10.4244/EIJY15M08_03

Nakatani S., 2015 Oct 9., Comparative analysis method of permanent metallic stents (XIENCE) and bioresorbable poly-L-lactic (PLLA) scaffolds (Absorb) on optical coherence tomo_graphy at baseline and follow-up., EuroIntervention., Epub AOP

Windecker S., 2015, Comparison of a novel biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a dur_able polymer everolimus-eluting stent: results of the randomized BIOFLOW-II trial., Circ Cardiovasc Interv., 8, e001441, 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001441

Serruys PW., 2010, Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting coronary stents., N Engl J Med., 363, 136, 10.1056/NEJMoa1004130

Puricel S., 2016, Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold Thrombosis: Multicenter Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Presentation, Mechanisms, and Predictors., J Am Coll Cardiol., 67, 921, 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.019

de la Torre Hernandez JM., 2010, Thrombosis of second-generation drug-eluting stents in real practice results from the multicenter Spanish registry ESTROFA-2 (Estudio Espanol Sobre Trombosis de Stents Farmacoactivos de Segunda Generacion-2)., JACC Cardiovasc Interv., 3, 911, 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.06.010

Räber L., 2012, Very late coronary stent thrombosis of a newer-generation everolimus-eluting stent compared with early-generation drug-eluting stents: a prospective cohort study., Circulation., 125, 1110, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.058560

Onuma Y., 2014, Incidence and imaging outcomes of acute scaffold disruption and late structural discontinuity after implantation of the absorb Everolimus-Eluting fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold: optical coherence tomography assessment in the ABSORB cohort B Trial (A Clinical Evaluation of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions)., JACC Cardiovasc Interv., 7, 1400, 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.06.016

Mangiameli A., 2015, Neoatherosclerosis as the cause of late failure of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold., JACC Cardiovasc Interv., 8, 633, 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.11.014

Serruys PW., 2014, Dynamics of vessel wall changes following the implantation of the absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a multi-imaging modality study at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months., EuroIntervention., 9, 1271, 10.4244/EIJV9I11A217

Maier W., 2002, Exercise-induced coronary artery vasodilation is not impaired by stent placement., Circulation., 105, 2373, 10.1161/01.CIR.0000016360.97819.44

Iannaccone M., 2016 Apr 20., Optical coherence tomography evaluation of intermediate-term healing of different stent types: systemic review and meta-analysis., Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging., Epub AOP

Onuma Y., 2015, Differences in coronary risk factors, procedural characteristics, mortality and stent thrombosis between two all-comers percutaneous coronary intervention registries from Europe and Japan: a patient-level data analysis of the Bern-Rotterdam and j-Cypher registries., EuroIntervention., 11, 533, 10.4244/EIJY14M06_09

Gutiérrez-Chico JL., 2012, Vascular tissue reaction to acute malapposition in human coronary arteries: sequential assessment with optical coherence tomography., Circ Cardiovasc Interv., 5, 20-9, s1, 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.965301

Serruys PW., 2011, Evaluation of the second generation of a bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold for the treatment of de novo coronary artery stenosis: 12-month clinical and imaging outcomes., J Am Coll Cardiol., 58, 1578, 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.05.050

de Jaegere P., 1998, Intravascular ultrasound-guided optimized stent deployment. Immediate and 6 months clinical and angiographic results from the Multicenter Ultrasound Stenting in Coronaries Study (MUSIC Study)., Eur Heart J., 19, 1214, 10.1053/euhj.1998.1012

Brugaletta S., 2012, Vascular compliance changes of the coronary vessel wall after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in the treated and adjacent segments., Circ J., 76, 1616, 10.1253/circj.CJ-11-1416

Gomez-Lara J., 2011, Head-to-head comparison of the neointimal response between metallic and bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffolds using optical coherence tomography., JACC Cardiovasc Interv., 4, 1271, 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.016

Sabate M., 2016, Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable stent vs. durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the ran_domized ABSORB ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-TROFI II trial., Eur Heart J., 37, 229, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv500

Sotomi Y., 2016, Quantitative assessment of the stent/scaffold strut embedment analysis by optical coherence tomography., Int J Cardiovasc Imaging., 32, 871, 10.1007/s10554-016-0856-6