Towards water literacy: an interdisciplinary analysis of standards for teaching and learning about humans and Water

Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research - Tập 4 Số 1
Silvia-Jessica Mostacedo-Marasovic1, Brooke Colleen Mott2, Holly White3, Cory T. Forbes4
1Earth and Environmental Sciences Department, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA
2School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
3School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME, USA
4College of Education, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractWater is critical to sustain human existence. Water literacy involves understanding the interactions within and between natural and human dimensions of water systems to support informed decision-making, an important outcome for learners of all ages. It is therefore critical to foster water literacy in today’s global citizens, particularly through formal education. The purpose of this study, in tandem with a parallel study focusing on natural dimensions of water systems (Mostacedo-Marasovic et al., in press), is to examine water-related K-12 standards for teaching and learning about human dimensions of water systems to develop a comprehensive and transdisciplinary perspective on water education. Our overarching question is, “What do disciplinary standards specify as outcomes for students’ learning about water and humans?”. Our research questions are: i) “To what extent do these water-related standards address recognized domains of learning?” and ii) “What thematic outcomes for students’ learning are apparent across grades in these water-related standards?”. We use chi-square statistics and a conventional qualitative content analysis method complemented by processes from grounded theory to analyze water-related education standards (N = 341) from 12 education-oriented, governmental and non-governmental organizations based in the United States. Our results indicate that first, water-related standards emphasize the cognitive domain, including declarative and procedural knowledge. The affective domain and its social and emotional components are much less prevalent. Second, the water-related standards illustrate five categories which encompass human dimensions of water spanning K-12 grade bands, including human settlements; the nexus between water, food, and energy; public health; impacts of human activities on water quality and quantity; and water resources management. Overall, the study contributes to a more holistic and comprehensive perspective of water and human systems that can help inform teaching and learning to cultivate water literacy, including curriculum development and classroom pedagogy.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Amahmid, O., El Guarmri, Y., Yazidi, M., Razoki, B., Kaid Rassou, K., Rakibi, Y., … El Ouardi, T. (2019). Water education in school curricula: Impact on children’s knowledge, attitudes and behaviors towards water use. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(3), 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2018.1513446.

American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy, (1st ed., ). Oxford University Press.

American Farm Bureau Foundation for Agriculture (2012). Pillars of agricultural literacy: Understanding the intersection between agriculture and society. American Farm Bureau Foundation for Agriculture.

Ballantyne, R. R., & Packer, J. M. (1996). Teaching and learning in environmental education: Developing environmental conceptions. The Journal of Environmental Education, 27(2), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1996.9941455.

Barab, S. A., Sadler, T. D., Heiselt, C., Hickey, D., & Zuiker, S. (2007). Relating narrative, inquiry, and inscriptions: Supporting consequential play. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9033-3.

Belland, B. R., Gu, J., Armbrust, S., & Cook, B. (2015). Scaffolding argumentation about water quality: A mixed-method study in a rural middle school. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(3), 325–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9373-x.

Ben-zvi-Assarf, O., & Orion, N. (2005). A study of junior high students' perceptions of the water cycle. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 366–373. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.4.366.

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. D., Hill, W. H., & Krathowhl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. David McKay Company Inc.

Bodzin, A. M. (2008). Integrating instructional technologies in a local watershed investigation with urban elementary learners. The Journal of Environmental Education, 39(2), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.39.2.47-58.

Brody, M. (1995). Development of a curriculum framework for water education for educators, scientists, and resource managers. Journal of Environmental Education, 26(4), 18–29.

Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Norby, M. M. (2010). Chapter 3: Long-term memory: Structures and models. In R. H. Bruning, G. J. Schraw, M. M. Norby (Eds.), Cognitive Psychology and Instruction. (5th edition, pp.37–64). Pearson.

Çakır Yıldırım, B., & Karaarslan Semiz, G. (2019). Future teachers’ sustainable water consumption behavior: A test of the value-belief-norm theory. Sustainability, 11(6), 1558. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061558.

Cankaya, C., & Iscen, C. F. (2015). Development of pre-service science teachers’ awareness of sustainable water use. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(4), 471–484 https://doi.org/10.587-ERR2014.2053.

Chen, S., & Liu, S. (2020). Developing students’ action competence for a sustainable future: A review of educational research. Sustainability, 12(4), 1374. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041374.

Çoban, G. Ü., Akpınar, E., Küçükcankurtaran, E., Yıldız, E., & Ergin, Ö. (2011). Elementary school students’ water awareness. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 20(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2011.540103.

Covitt, B. A., Gunckel, K. L., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Students’ developing understanding of water in environmental systems. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(3), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.37-51.

Creswell, J., & Guetterman, T. (2019). Chapter 13: Grounded theory designs. In J. Creswell, & T. Guetterman (Eds.), Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, (6th ed., pp. 433–472). Pearson.

Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2018). Chapter 4: Five qualitative approaches to inquiry: Grounded theory research. In J. Creswell, & T. Guetterman (Eds.), Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among five approaches, (4th ed., pp. 82–90). SAGE publications.

Davis, J. (2005). Educating for sustainability in the early years: Creating cultural change in a child care setting. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 47–55 https://www.jstor.org/stable/44656437.

Dean, A. J., Fielding, K. S., & Newton, F. J. (2016). Community knowledge about water: Who has better knowledge and is this associated with water-related behaviors and support for water-related policies? PLoS One, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159063.

Earth Science Literacy Initiative (ESLI). (2010). Earth science literacy principles: The big ideas and supporting concepts of Earth science. http://www.earthscienceliteracy.org/

Endreny, A. H. (2009). Urban 5th graders conceptions during a place-based inquiry unit on watersheds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20348.

Fremerey, C., Liefländer, A. K., & Bogner, F. X. (2014). Conceptions about drinking water of 10 th graders and undergraduates. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 6(12), 1112. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2014.612104.

Geography Education National Implementation Project - GENIP. (n.d.). National Geography Standards: National Geography Standards Index. https://www.nationalgeographic.org/standards/national-geography-standards/

Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2017). Statistics for the behavioral sciences, (10th ed., ). CENGAGE Learning.

Gruver, J., & Luloff, A. E. (2008). Engaging Pennsylvania teachers in watershed education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.1.43-54.

Gruver, J. B., Smith, S. S., & Finley, J. C. (2009). Water curriculum evaluation for educators in Pennsylvania. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 7(4), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/15330150902744210.

Gunckel, K. L., Covitt, B. A., Salinas, I., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). A learning progression for water in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 843–868. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21024.

Hale, A. E., Shelton, C. C., Richter, J., & Archambault, L. M. (2017). Integrating geoscience and sustainability: Examining socio-techno-ecological relationships within content designed to prepare teachers. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.5408/16-177.1.

Halvorson, S. J., & Westcoat Jr., J. L. (2002). Problem-based inquiry on world water problems in large undergraduate classes. Journal of Geography, 101(3), 91–102.

Havu-Nuutinen, S., Karkkainen, S., & Keinonen, T. (2011). Primary school pupils’ perceptions of water in the context of STS study approach. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(4), 321–339.

International Society for Technology in Education. (2016). ISTE standards for students. https://www.iste.org/standards/iste-standards-for-students

Johnson, D., & Courter, J. (2020). Assessing water literacy at a primarily undergraduate university in Ohio. National Sciences Education, 49(e20024). https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.2.20024.

Joint Committee on National Health Education Standards (JCNHES) (2007). National Health Education Standards—Achieving Excellence, (2nd ed., ). Washington, D.C.: The American Cancer Society https://www.cdc.gov/healthyschools/sher/standards/index.htm.

King, E. G., O’Donnell, F. C., & Caylor, K. K. (2012). Reframing hydrology education to solve coupled human and environmental problems. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16, 4023–4031. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4023-2012.

Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals. In Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay.

Krippendorff, K. (2013). Part II: Components of content analysis. In Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology, (3rd ed., pp. 82–185). SAGE publications.

Lee, T. D., Jones, M. G., & Chesnutt, K. (2019). Teaching systems thinking in the context of the water cycle. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 137–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9613-7.

Littledyke, M. (2008). Science education for environmental awareness: Approaches to integrating cognitive and affective domains. Environmental Education Research, 14(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701843301.

Martínez-Borreguero, G., Maestre-Jiménez, J., Mateos-Núñez, M., & Naranjo-Correa, F. L. (2020). Water from the perspective of education for sustainable development: An exploratory study in the Spanish secondary education curriculum. Water, 12(1877). https://doi.org/10.3390/w12071877.

McCarroll, M., & Hamann, H. (2020). What we know about water: A water literacy review. Water, 12(2803), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102803.

McKim, A. J., Forbush, M., & McKendree, R. (2018). Sustainable water management within agriculture, food, and natural resources education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 59(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2018.02166.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation, (4th ed., ). Jossey-Bass.

Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., López-Belmonte, J., & Alonso-García, S. (2020). Flipped learning approach as educational innovation in water literacy. Water, 12(574). https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020574.

Mostacedo-Marasovic, S.-J., Mott, B. C., White, H., & Forbes, C. T. (in press). Towards Water literacy: Analysis of standards for teaching and learning about Water on earth. Journal of Geoscience Education.

National Research Council (NRC) (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.

Next Generation Science Standards Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

North American Association for Environmental Education (NAAEE) (2019). K-12 environmental education: Guidelines for excellence. NAAEE.

Otaki, Y., Sakura, O., & Otaki, M. (2015). Advocating water literacy. Mahasarakham International Journal of Engineering Technology, 1(1), 36–40.

Owens, D., Petitt, D., Lally, D., & Forbes, C. T. (2020). Cultivating water literacy in STEM education: Undergraduates’ socio-scientific reasoning about socio-hydrologic issues. Water, 12(2857). https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102857.

Pan, Y.-T., & Liu, S.-C. (2018). Students’ understanding of a groundwater system and attitudes towards groundwater use and conservation. International Journal of Science Education, 40(5), 564–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1435922.

Petitt, D. N., & Forbes, C. T. (2019). Values use of undergraduate students in socio-hydrological reasoning: A comparative study. Natural Sciences Education, 48(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4195/nse2018.09.0016.

Rieckmann, M., Mindt, L., & Gardiner, S. (2017). Education for sustainable development: Learning objectives. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10113.

Sabel, J., Vo, T., Alred, A., Dauer, J., & Forbes, C. (2017). Research and teaching: Undergraduate students' scientifically informed decision making about socio-hydrological issues. Journal of College Science Teaching, 046(06), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst17_046_06_71.

Sadler, T. D., Nguyen, H., & Lankford, D. (2017). Water systems understandings: A framework for designing instruction and considering what learners know about water. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 4(1), e1178. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1178.

Sammel, A. J. (2014). A case study of water education in Australia. Creative Education, 5, 1140–1147. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.513129.

Savenije, H. H., Hoekstra, A. Y., & van der Zaag, P. (2014). Evolving water science in the Anthropocene. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18, 319–332. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-319-2014.

Shepardson, D. P., Harbor, J., Cooper, B., & McDonald, J. (2002). The impact of a professional development program on teachers' understandings about watersheds, water quality, and stream monitoring. The Journal of Environmental Education, 33(3), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960209600813.

Shepardson, D. P., Wee, B., Priddy, M., Schellenberger, L., & Harbor, J. (2007). What is a watershed? Implications of student conceptions for environmental science education and the national science education standards. Science Education, 91(4), 554–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20206.

Simonds, V. W., Kim, F. L., LaVeaux, D., Pickett, V., Milakovich, J., & Cummins, J. (2018). Guardians of the living water: Using a health literacy framework to evaluate a child as change agent intervention. Health Education & Behavior, 46(2), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198118798676.

Sivapalan, M., Savenije, H. H. G., & Blöschl, G. (2012). Socio-hydrology: A new science of people and water. Hydrological Processes, 26, 1270–1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8426.

Spellerberg, I., Ward, J., & Smith, F. (2004). A water quality monitoring programme for schools and communities. Journal of Biological Education, 38(4), 163–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2004.9655935.

Spielmaker, D. M., & Leising, J. G. (2013). National Agricultural Literacy Curriculum Matrix. National Agriculture in the Classroom. http://agclassroom.org/teacher/matrix

U.S. Department of Energy. (2017). Energy literacy: Essential principles and fundamental concepts for energy education. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2017/07/f35/Energy_Literacy.pdf

U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP). (2009). Climate literacy: The essential principles of climate science. https://www.climate.gov/teaching/climate

UNESCO. (2015). Advancing water education and capacity-building: Key for water security and sustainable development: Recommendations for the future of water-related education for sustainable development. Retrieved on March 1st, 2022. https://undesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/4822/pf0000235630.locale=en.

UNESCO, & UN Water (2020). The United Nations world Water development report 2020: Water and climate change. United Nations https://www.unwater.org/publications/world-water-development-report-2020/.

United Nations World Water Assessment Programme (2017). The United Nations world water development report, 2017: Wastewater: The untapped resource. Paris: UNESCO http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/water/wwap/wwdr/2017-wastewater-the-untapped-resource/.

White, H., & Forbes, C. T. (2021). An investigation of undergraduate students’ spatial thinking about groundwater. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2021.2004582.

White, H., Lally, D., & Forbes, C. T. (2022). Investigating groundwater: Middle school students’ mapping data-driven, computer-based models to socio-hydrologic phenomena. Journal of Geoscience Education, 70(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2021.1899553.

World Health Organization, & United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) (2015). Progress on sanitation and drinking water: 2015 update and MDG assessment. World Health Organization https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/177752.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research

Tập 4 Số 1

Thông tin tác giả