The use of tamsulosin in the medical treatment of ureteral calculi: where do we stand?

Urological Research - Tập 33 - Trang 460-464 - 2005
Riccardo Autorino1,2, Marco De Sio1, Rocco Damiano3, Giuseppe Di Lorenzo1, Sisto Perdonà1, Aniello Russo1, Giuseppe Quarto1, Luca Cosentino1, Massimo D’Armiento1
1Department of Urology, Second University
2Vico Santo Spirito 54, 80132 Naples
3Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University

Tóm tắt

It has recently been demonstrated that specific adrenoceptors subtypes (α1A/α1D) are prevalent in the distal part of the ureter, a finding supporting the interesting results obtained by different groups with the use of tamsulosin in the treatment of distal ureteral calculi. We performed a prospective randomized study to evaluate the effects of the addition of tamsulosin on our standard pharmacological therapy for the treatment of selected ureteral stones. A total of 64 patients referred to our department for the management of symptomatic ureteral calculi were considered. Patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups: group A (n=32) who received diclofenac (100 mg/daily) plus aescin (80 mg/daily) and group B (n=32) who received the same therapy plus tamsulosin (0.4 mg/daily) for a maximum of 2 weeks. No significant differences were found between the groups for age, gender distribution and mean stone size measured in the single largest dimension at presentation. The stone expulsion rate was 60% (19/32 patients) for group A and 88% for (28/32) for group B with a mean expulsion time of 7.4±2.2 (range 3.5–12) and 4.8±2.7 days (range 1.8–10.5), respectively. Group B showed a significant advantage in terms of both expulsion rate (P=0.01) and expulsion time (P=0.005). Different analgesics from those used in the standard treatment regimen were required in ten patients in group A (31%) but only three patients in group B (9%). This difference was significant (P=0.003). Hospitalization for recurrent colic was needed in 21% of patients in group A (7/32) and in 9% in group B (3/32) (P=0.01). Only two patients in each group (6%) experienced minor side effects associated with the expulsive therapy. Our data confirm the efficacy of tamsulosin in the treatment of distal ureteral stones up to 1 cm. This selective α-blocker should therefore be included in the pharmacological regimen of patients when a conservative approach is considered in the treatment of ureteral lithiasis.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Dunn JC, Matheson A, Faulds DM (2002) Tamsulosin. Drugs Aging 19: 135

Pak CY (1998) Kidney stones. Lancet 351: 1797

Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG et al. (1997) Ureteral stones clinical guidelines panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 158: 1915

Obara K, Takeda M, Shimura H et al. (1996) Alpha-1 adrenoreceptors subtypes in the human ureter. Characterization by RT-PCR and in situ hybridization. J Urol [Suppl] 155: 472A

Ukhal M, Malomuzh O, Strashny V (1999) Administration of doxazosine for speedy elimination of stones from lower part of ureter. Proceedings XIV EAU Meeting, Stockholm 1999

Teichman JM (2004) Clinical practice. Acute renal colic from ureteral calculus. N Engl J Med 350: 684