The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation - Tập 81 - Trang S21-S29 - 2000
Michelle E. Cohen1, Ralph J. Marino
1Department of Occupational Therapy, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. [email protected]

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

World Health Organization

Gray, 2000, The ICIDH-2: developments for a new era of outcomes research, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 81, S10, 10.1053/apmr.2000.20616

Dijkers, 2000, Measures of social outcomes in disability research, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 81, S63, 10.1053/apmr.2000.20627

McDowell, 1987

Staff of the Benjamin Rose Hospital, 1959, Multidisciplinary studies of illness in aged persons: II, a new classification of functional status in activities of daily living, Chron Dis, 9, 55, 10.1016/0021-9681(59)90137-7

Lawton, 1971, The functional assessment of elderly people, J Am Geriatr Soc, 19, 456, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1971.tb01206.x

Harvey, 1981, Functional performance assessment: a program approach, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 62, 456

Katz, 1963, Studies of illness in the aged. The Index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function, JAMA, 185, 914, 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016

Mahoney, 1965, Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index, Md State Med J, 14, 61

Wade, 1988, The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability, Int Disabil Stud, 10, 67, 10.3109/09638288809164105

1993

Carey, 1978, Program of a physical medicine and rehabilitation unit: a new approach, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 59, 330

Weingarden, 1989, Independent dressing after spinal cord injury: a functional time evaluation, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 70, 518

1990

Kirschner, 1985, A methodological framework for assessing health indices, J Chron Dis, 38, 27, 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90005-0

Katz, 1970, Progress in development of the index of ADL, Gerontologist, 10, 20, 10.1093/geront/10.1_Part_1.20

Labi, 1984, Some research applications of functional assessment instruments used in rehabilitation medicine, 86

Katz, 1966, Prognosis after strokes. Part II. Long-term course of 159 patients, Medicine, 45, 236, 10.1097/00005792-196605000-00003

Katz, 1967, Long-term course of 147 patients with fracture of the hip, Surg Gynecol Obst, 124, 1219

Katz, 1968, Comprehensive outpatient care in rheumatoid arthritis, a controlled study, JAMA, 206, 1249, 10.1001/jama.1968.03150060023004

Grotz, 1972, A comparison of the functional and intellectual performance of phenylketonuric, anoxic, and Down's syndrome individuals, Am J Mental Def, 76, 710

Katz, 1976, A measure of primary sociobiological functions, Int J Health Serv, 6, 493, 10.2190/UURL-2RYU-WRYD-EY3K

Katz, 1979, The measurement of long-term care needs and impact, Health Med Care Serv Rev, 2, 1

Gresham, 1980, ADL status in stroke: relative merits of three standard indexes, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 61, 355

Hartig, 1997, Accuracy of nurse aides' functional health assessments of nursing home residents, J Gerontol, 52, 142, 10.1093/gerona/52A.3.M142

Asberg, 1991, Early prognosis of stroke outcome by means of Katz Index of activities of daily living, Scand J Rehabil Med, 23, 187, 10.2340/165019779123187191

Gillen, 1996, Functional and residential status transitions among nursing home residents, J Gerontol, 51, 29, 10.1093/gerona/51A.1.M29

Granger, 1979, Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: measurement of PULSES profile and Barthel Index, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 60, 145

Granger, 1982, Health accounting: functional assessment of the long-term patient, 253

Gresham, 1984, Functional assessment instruments currently available for documenting outcomes in rehabilitation medicine, 65

Yarkony, 1987, Benefits of rehabilitation for traumatic spinal cord injury. Multivariate analysis in 711 patients, Arch Neurol, 44, 93, 10.1001/archneur.1987.00520130071020

Crewe, 1995, Functional assessment, 101

Mattison, 1991, Rehabilitation status: the relationship between the Edinburgh Rehabilitation Status Scale (ERSS), Barthel Index, and PULSES Profile, Int Disabil Stud, 13, 9, 10.3109/03790799109166269

Schuling, 1993, The Frenchay Activities Index. Assessment of functional status in stroke patients, Stroke, 24, 1173, 10.1161/01.STR.24.8.1173

Post, 1996, The SIP68: a measure of health-related functional status in rehabilitation medicine, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 77, 440, 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90031-3

Anderson, 1996, Validation of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey Questionnaire among stroke patients, Stroke, 27, 1812, 10.1161/01.STR.27.10.1812

Wylie, 1997, Measuring end results of rehabilitation of patients with stroke, Public Health Rep, 82, 893, 10.2307/4593156

Granger, 1979, Stroke rehabilitation: analysis of repeated Barthel Index measures, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 60, 14

Fortinsky, 1981, The use of functional assessment in understanding home care needs, Med Care, 19, 489, 10.1097/00005650-198105000-00002

D'Olhaberriague, 1996, A reappraisal of reliability and validity studies in stroke, Stroke, 27, 2331, 10.1161/01.STR.27.12.2331

Sheikh, 1979, Repeatability and validity of a modified activities of daily living (ADL) index in studies of chronic disability, Int Rehabil Med, 1, 51, 10.3109/03790797909164024

Laake, 1995, The Barthel ADL Index: factor structure depends upon the category of patient, Age Aging, 24, 393, 10.1093/ageing/24.5.393

Kelly, 1996, A comparison of measures of disability and health status in people with physical disabilities undergoing vocational rehabilitation, J Public Health Med, 18, 169, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024476

Wellwood, 1995, A comparison of the Barthel Index and the OPCS disability instrument used to measure outcome after acute stroke, Age Aging, 24, 54, 10.1093/ageing/24.1.54

Shepherd, 1996, Use of standardized assessment scales in elderly hip fracture patients, J Royal Coll Physicians London, 30, 335

van der Putten, 1999, Measuring change in disability after the inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 66, 480, 10.1136/jnnp.66.4.480

Roy, 1988, An inter-rater reliability study of the Barthel Index, Int J Rehabil Res, 11, 67, 10.1097/00004356-198803000-00010

Shinar, 1997, Reliability of the Activities of Daily Living Scale and its use in telephone interview, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 68, 723

Loewen, 1988, Reliability of the Modified Motor Assessment Scale and the Barthel Index, Phys Ther, 68, 1077, 10.1093/ptj/68.7.1077

Korner-Bitensky, 1995, Barthel Index information elicited over the telephone. Is it reliable?, Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 74, 9, 10.1097/00002060-199501000-00003

Sarno, 1973, The functional life scale, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 54, 214

Carey, 1982, Rehabilitation program evaluation using a revised Levels of Rehabilitation Scale (LORS-II), Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 63, 367

1992

Carey, 1988, Integrating program evaluation, quality assurance, and marketing for inpatient rehabilitation, Rehabil Nurs, 13, 66, 10.1002/j.2048-7940.1988.tb01058.x

Carey, 1988, Who makes the most progress in inpatient rehabilitation? An analysis of functional gain, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 69, 337

Velozo, 1995, Functional scale discrimination at admission and discharge: Rasch analysis of the Levels of Rehabilitation Scale-III, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 76, 705, 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80523-0

Velozo, 1993, Measurement of qualities of the Levels of Rehabilitation Scale-III (LORS-III) [Abstract], Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 74, 661, 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90186-E

Harvey, 1992, Applying psychometric criteria to functional assessment in medical rehabilitation: III. Construct validity and predicting level of care, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 73, 887

Silverstein, 1992, Applying psychometric criteria to functional assessment in medical rehabilitation: II. Defining interval measures, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 73, 507

Silverstein, 1991, Applying psychometric criteria to functional assessment in medical rehabilitation: I. Exploring unidimensionality, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 72, 631

Rao, 1984, Computerized tomography head scans as predictors of rehabilitation outcome, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 65, 18

Chaudhuri, 1988, Computerized tomography head scans as predictors of functional outcome of stroke patients, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 69, 496

Korner-Bitensky, 1989, Motor and functional recovery after stroke: accuracy of physical therapists' predictions, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 70, 95

Rao, 1992, Predicting return to work in traumatic brain injury using assessment scales, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 73, 911

Smith, 1997, The relationship between goals and functional status in the patient evaluation conference system, Phys Med Rehabil State Art Rev, 11, 333

Parke, 1989, Functional outcome after delivery of intrathecal baclofen, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 70, 30, 10.1016/S0003-9993(21)01642-7

Clydesdale, 1990, Social dimensions to functional gain in pediatric patients, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 71, 469

Granger, 1998, The emerging science of functional assessment: our tool for outcomes analysis, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 78, 235, 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90000-4

Granger, 1986, Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation, Top Geriatr Rehabil, 1, 59, 10.1097/00013614-198604000-00007

Hamilton, 1987, A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation, 137

Granger, 1993, Performance profiles of the Functional Independence Measure, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 72, 84, 10.1097/00002060-199304000-00005

Heinemann, 1993, Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the Functional Independence Measure, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 74, 566, 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90153-2

Linacre, 1994, The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 75, 127, 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90384-0

Dodds, 1993, A validation of the Functional Independence Measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 74, 531, 10.1016/0003-9993(93)90119-U

Heinemann, 1997, Relationships between disability measures and nursing effort during medical rehabilitation for patients with traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 78, 143, 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90255-0

Heinemann, 1994, Measurement characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure, Top Stroke Rehabil, 1, 1, 10.1080/10749357.1994.11754030

Granger, 1990, Functional assessment scales: a study of persons with multiple sclerosis, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 71, 870

Disler, 1993, Predicting hours of care needed, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 74, 139

Stineman, 1997, Impairment-specific dimensions within the Functional Independence Measure, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 78, 636, 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90430-5

Stineman, 1996, The Functional Independence Measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 77, 1101, 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90130-6

Dickson, 1996, The multi-dimensionality of the FIM motor items precludes an interval scaling using Rasch analysis, Scand J Rehabil Med, 26, 159

Whiteneck GG. A Functional Independence Measure trial in the SCI Model Systems [abstract]. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Scientific Meeting of American Spinal Injury Association. 1998 May 2-4; San Diego (CA).

Ottenbacher, 1996, The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 77, 1226, 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90184-7

Marino, 1998, Comparison of the self report and observational methods of the Functional Independence Measure at discharge from rehabilitation for spinal cord injury, J Spinal Cord Inj Med, 21, 152

Segal, 1993, Institutional agreement of individual Functional Independence Measure (FIM) items measured at two sites on one sample of SCI patients, Paraplegia, 31, 622, 10.1038/sc.1993.101

Malzer, 1988, Patient performance level during inpatient physical rehabilitation: therapist, nurse and patient perspective, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 69, 363

Fisher, 1993, REHABITS: a common language of functional assessment, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 76, 113, 10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80020-4

Granger, 1990, Functional assessment scales: a study of persons with multiple sclerosis, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 71, 870

Fiedler, 2000, The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation: report of first admissions for 1998, Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 79, 87, 10.1097/00002060-200001000-00017

Grimby, 1996, The functional independence measure in Sweden: experience for outcome measurement in rehabilitation medicine, Scand J Rehabil Med, 28, 51

Iwanenko, 1999, Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation: report of first admissions to subacute rehabilitation for 1995, 1996 and 1997, Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 78, 384, 10.1097/00002060-199907000-00020

Davidoff, 1990, Cognitive dysfunction in spinal cord injury patients: sensitivity of the Functional Independence Measure subscales vs. neuropsychologic assessment, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 71, 326

Ditunno, 1995, Functional outcomes in spinal cord injury, 170

Hall, 1999, Characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure in traumatic spinal cord injury, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 80, 1471, 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90260-5

Granger, 1995, Reliability of a brief outpatient functional outcome assessment measure, Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 74, 469, 10.1097/00002060-199511000-00018

Deutsch, 1996, The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the Functional Independence Measure for Children (Wee-FIM Instrument): ten years of development, Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med, 8, 267

Dijkers, 1999, Short versions of the telephone motor Functional Independence Measure for use with persons with spinal cord injury, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 80, 1477, 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90261-7

Haig, 1997, Are standardized outcomes measures valid for small rehabilitation units?: a commentary, Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 76, 147, 10.1097/00002060-199703000-00012

Eastwood, 1999, Medical rehabilitation length of stay and outcomes for persons with traumatic spinal cord injury, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 80, 1457, 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90258-7

Segal, 1997, Modeling case mix adjustment of stroke rehabilitation outcomes, Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 76, 154, 10.1097/00002060-199703000-00015

Andresen, 2000, Criteria for assessing tools of disability outcomes research, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 81, S15, 10.1053/apmr.2000.20619