The long-term feasibility of border carbon mechanisms: An analysis of measures proposed in the European Union and the United States and the steel production sector

Sustainable Horizons - Tập 6 - Trang 100053 - 2023
Daniel Rossetto1
1School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, The University of Adelaide, Faculty of Sciences, Engineering and Technology

Tài liệu tham khảo

Inflation Reduction Act. (2022) United States of America, Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress. 2023 Bellora, 2022 2023 Bodansky, 2007 Böning, 2023, Benefits and costs of the ETS in the EU, a lesson learned for the CBAM design Cooper, 2020, The potential for material circularity and independence in the U.S. steel sector, Journal of industrial ecology, 24, 748, 10.1111/jiec.12971 Cosbey, 2019, Developing Guidance for Implementing Border Carbon Adjustments: Lessons, Cautions, and Research Needs from the Literature, Review of environmental economics and policy, 13, 3, 10.1093/reep/rey020 Cunningham, 2019, The Changing Global Market for Australian Coal, Reserve Bank of Australia Bulletin - September 2019, 28 Della Vigna, 2021 Edelstein, 2022, Rousseau, Bodin, and the Medieval Corporatist Origins of Popular Sovereignty, Political theory, 50, 142, 10.1177/0090591720985452 Ellis, 2009 Eskander, 2023, The impact of climate legislation on trade‑related carbon emissions 1996–2018, Environment and Resource Economics, 10.1007/s10640-023-00762-w Eurofer. (2020). "Eurofer statistical definitions." Eurofer Statistics Retrieved 2 March 2023, from https://www.eurofer.eu/statistics/about-eurofer-statistics/eurofer-statistics-definitions/. 2008, Directive 2008/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to include aviation activities in the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community, Official Journal of the European Union. European Commission European Commission (2019). The European Green Deal. European Commission. Brussels. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. 2021, European Commission 2021, Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism, European Union, European Commission 2021, Annual European Union greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2019 and inventory report 2021, Copenhagen, European Environment Agency Geels, 2023, Low-carbon reorientation in a declining industry? A longitudinal analysis of coevolving contexts and company strategies in the UK steel industry (1988–2022), Energy research & social science, 96, 10.1016/j.erss.2023.102953 Goodman, 2003, Toward an Institutional Theory of Sovereignty, Stanford law review, 55, 1749 Grubb, 2022, Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade, Annual review of environment and resources, 47, 753, 10.1146/annurev-environ-120820-053625 Gupta, 2020 Hogan Lovells. (2023). “The IRA: What's in it for manufacturers?”. Horn, 2013 Horngren, 2023 Howe, 2017 International Carbon Action Partnership. (2022). “EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS).” Fact Sheet Retrieved 26 September 2022, from https://icapcarbonaction.com/system/files/ets_pdfs/icap-etsmap-factsheet-43.pdf. Keen, 2022, Border carbon adjustments: rationale, design and impact, Fiscal studies, 43, 209, 10.1111/1475-5890.12307 Kurtulus, 2005 Leonelli, 2022, Carbon Border Measures, Environmental Effectiveness and WTO Law Compatibility: Is There a Way Forward for the Steel and Aluminium Climate Club?, World trade review, 21, 619, 10.1017/S1474745622000209 Leonelli, 2022, Practical obstacles and structural legal constraints in the adoption of ‘defensive’ policies: comparing the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and the US Proposal for a Border Carbon Adjustment, Legal Studies, 42, 696, 10.1017/lst.2022.20 Lisowski, 2002, Playing the two-level game: US president Bush's decision to repudiate the Kyoto Protocol, Environmental politics, 11, 101, 10.1080/714000641 Maat, 2022, Leading by Example, Ideas or Coercion? The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism as a Case of Hybrid EU Climate Leadership, European Papers, 7, 55 Mehling, 2019, Designing Border Carbon Adjustments for Enhanced Climate Action, The American journal of international law, 113, 433, 10.1017/ajil.2019.22 Meyer, 2022, Trade and Climate, Law and Politics: A Response, World trade review, 21, 127, 10.1017/S1474745621000422 Muslemani, 2021, Opportunities and challenges for decarbonizing steel production by creating markets for ‘green steel’ products, Journal of cleaner production, 315, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128127 Overland, 2022, Know your opponent: Which countries might fight the European carbon border adjustment mechanism?, Energy policy, 169, 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113175 Pirlot, 2017 Poljak, 2023 Porter, 1995, Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship, The Journal of economic perspectives, 9, 97, 10.1257/jep.9.4.97 Rossetto, 2023, The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: What does it mean for steel recycling?, Sustainable Horizons, 5, 10.1016/j.horiz.2023.100048 Russian Aviation (2012). “Joint declaration of the Moscow meeting on inclusion of international civil aviation in the EU-ETS”. Sandbag (2022). “European scrap steel floats away under carbon market incentives.” https://sandbag.be/index.php/2022/09/22/european-scrap-steel-floats-away-under-carbon-market-incentives/2022. Sapir, A. and H. H. Bruegel (2020). Political assessment of possible reactions of EU main trading partners to EU border carbon measures. Brussels. Shao, 2020, Environmental Regulation and Enterprise Innovation: A Review, Business strategy and the environment, 29, 1465, 10.1002/bse.2446 Sheahan, 2012 Shen, 2023, Market reactions to a cross-border carbon policy: Evidence from listed Chinese companies, The British accounting review, 55, 10.1016/j.bar.2022.101116 Singh, 2022, Tracing the “Common but Differentiated Responsibilities” (CBDR) principle under climate change regime, Indian Journal of Law and Justice, 13, 251 Tucker, T. N. and T. Meyer (2021). A Green steel deal: Toward pro-jobs, pro-climate transatlantic cooperation on carbon border measures. Working Paper. New York, Roosevelt Institute. 1992 2023 Weijers, 2010, 141 White House (2021). FACT SHEET: The United States and European Union To Negotiate World's First Carbon-Based Sectoral Arrangement on Steel and Aluminum Trade. Joint US-EU statement on Trade in Steel and Aluminium,. Government of the United States of America. Wood, 2020 2022 2012, Sustainable Steel at the Core of a Green Economy, World Steel Association