The lobar approach to breast ultrasound imaging and surgery

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 42 Số 3 - Trang 331-339 - 2015
Dominique Amy1, E Durante2, Tibor Tot3
1Breast Center, Aix-en-Provence, France
2Institute of General Surgery, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
3Department of Clinical Pathology and Cytology, Central Hospital Falun, Falun, Sweden

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Cooper AP. On the anatomy of the breast. London: Longman, Orme, Green, Bown, and Longmans; 1840.

Townsend CM. Breast lumps. Clin Symp. 1980;32:1–30.

Durante EL, Cavazzini L. Surgical echography as diagnostic and staging tool in breast pathology. In: Montorsi M, Granelli P, editors. Thoracic Surgery. Bologna: Monduzzi Publisher; 1988. p. 301–8.

Durante E, Cavallesco NG, Pampolini M, et al. Echography of the breast. Indications, criteria and diagnostic possibilities. Minerva Chir. 1989;44:405–17 (Article in Italian).

Ueno E, Tohno E, Soeda S, et al. Dynamic tests in real-time breast echography. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1988;14:53–7.

Ueno E. Real-time two dimensional Doppler imaging in the breast diseases. Proceedings of the 55th annual scientific meeting of Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine 1990;73–74.

Teboul M, Halliwell M. Atlas of ultrasound and ductal echography of the breast. Oxford: Wiley; 1995.

Amy D. Echographie mammaire: echoanatomie. JL mensuel d’echographie LUS. 2000;10:654–62.

Gallager S, Martin J. Early phases in the development of breast cancer. Cancer. 1969;24:1170–8.

Holland R, Veling SHJ, Mravunac M, et al. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1–2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 1985;56:979–90.

Nakama S, Yokoi H. Shimatani Y, et al. Comparative studies on ultrasonogram with histological structure of the breast cancer: an examination in the invasive process of breast cancer and the fixation to the skin. In: Kasumi F, Ueno E, editors. Topics in breast Ultrasound. Tokyo (Japan): Shinohara Publishers; 1991. pp. 90–91.

Tot T. DCIS, cytokeratins, and the theory of the sick lobe. Virchows Arch. 2005;447:1–8.

Villadsen R. In search of stem cell hierarchy in the human breast and its relevance in breast cancer evolution. APMIS. 2005;113:903–21.

Agelopoulos K, Buerger H, Brandt B. Allelic imbalance of the egfr gene as key event in breast cancer progression: the concept of committed progenitor cells. Current Cancer Drug Target. 2008;8:431–45.

Tot T. The role of large-format histopathology in assessing subgross morphological prognostic parameters: a single institution report of 1000 consecutive breast cancer cases. Int J Breast Cancer. 2012;2012:1–8. Art ID 395415. doi: 10.1155/2012/395415

Tot T. The Sick Lobe Concept. In: Francescatti DS, Silverstein MJ, editors. Breast cancer: a new era in management. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 79–94.

Teboul M. Practical ductal echography, guide to intelligent and intelligible ultrasonic breast imaging. Madrid: Medgen SA; 2004. p. 240–340.

Teboul M. Advantages of ductal echography (DE) over conventional breast investigation: the requirement for an anatomically led breast ultrasonography. Med Ultrason. 2010;12:32–42.

Amy D. Lobar ultrasound of the breast. In: Tot T, editor. Breast cancer, a lobar disease. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 153–62.

Teboul M. A new concept in breast investigation: echohistological acino-ductal analysis or analytic echography. Biomed Pharmacother. 1988;42:289–96.

Tot T. Breast cancer subgross morphological parameters and their relation to molecular phenotypes and prognosis. J OncoPath. 2014;2:69–76.

Dolphin G. The surgical approach to the “sick lobe”. In: Francescatti DS, Silverstein MJ, editors. Breast cancer: a new era in management. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 113–32.

Curigliano G, Viale G, Bagnardi V, et al. Clinical relevance of HER2 overexpression/amplification in patients with small tumor size and node negative cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5693–9.

Tot T, Gere M, Pekár G, et al. Breast cancer multifocality, disease extent, and survival. Hum Pathol. 2011;42:1761–9.

Chung AP, Huynh K, Kidner T, et al. Comparison of outcomes of breast conserving therapy in multifocal and unifocal invasive breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215:137–46.

Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology: American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;8:553–64.

O’Sullivan MJ, Li T, Freedman G, et al. The effect of multiple reexcisions on the risk of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3133–40.

Mullenix PS, Cuadrado DG, Steele SR, et al. Secondary operations are frequently required to complete the surgical phase of therapy in the era of breast conservation and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Am J Surg. 2004;187:643–6.

Durante E, Pellegrini F, Carbonell Luna MI. Preoperative local staging of invasive cancer by US. In: Badulescu F, Bondari A, Enachescu V, editors. Syllabus of Euroson School Course Breast Ultrasound (ISBN 973-7757-23-8). Craiova (Romania): Editura Medicala Universitara Craiova; 2004. pp. 77–80.

Durante E, Pellegrini F, Carbonell Luna MI. US breast conservative surgery and sentinel node. In: Badulescu F, Bondari A, Enachescu V, editors. Syllabus of Euroson School Course Breast Ultrasound (ISBN 973-7757-23-8). Craiova (Romania): Editura Medicala Universitara Craiova; 2004. pp. 90–94.

Aziz D, Rawlinson E, Narod SA, et al. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Breast J. 2006;12:331–7.

Bani MR, Lux MP, Heusinger K, et al. Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:32–7.

Rath MG, Heil J, Domschke C, et al. Predictors of respectability in breast-conserving therapy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286:1023–31.

Jung W, Kang E, Kim SM, et al. Factors associated with re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2012;15:412–9.

Eck DL, Koonce SL, Goldberg RF, et al. Breast surgery outcomes as a quality measures according to the NSQIP database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3212–7.

McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowles EJ, et al. Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA. 2012;307:467–75.

Meier-Meitinger M, Rauth C, Adamietz B, et al. Accuracy of radiological tumour size assessment and the risk for re-excision in a cohort of primary breast cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38:44–51.

Wilke LG, Czechura T, Waang C, et al. Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of Stage 0 to II breast carcinoma: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 2004–2010. JAMA. 2014. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.926 .

M De Camargo Cancela, Comber H, Sharp L. Hospital and surgeon caseload are associated with risk of re-operation following breast-conserving surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;140:535–44.

Hunt KK, Sahin AA. Too much, too little, or just right? Tumors margins in women undergoing breast-conserving surgery. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1401–6.