The impact and interplay of national and global CSR discourses: insights from France and Brazil

AndréSobczak1, LigiaCoelho Martins2
1Director, Institute for Global Responsibility, Audencia Nantes School of Management, France
2Manager of the Responsibility and Sustainability Center, ISAE/FGV, Curitiba, Brazil

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to illustrate the interplay between national traditions and international influence on the CSR discourses and practices, in the context of two very different national contexts, namely France and Brazil.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is based on a literature review as well as on interviews with representatives from companies and other stakeholder groups in France and Brazil.FindingsThe paper highlights the impact of national traditions, such as the strong intervention of the State in France and the lack of monitoring legislation by public authorities in Brazil, on the CSR discourses and practices in both countries. But it also shows that multinational companies, international NGOs as well as international standardization organizations lead to a certain homogenisation of the CSR discourses and practices.Research limitations/implicationsThis exploratory research should be complemented in the future by more in‐depth research, for example by comparing the CSR discourses and practices of multinational companies having activities in both countries.Practical implicationsThe paper highlights the importance for managers in companies having activities in different countries to adapt their CSR discourses and practices to the local contexts, while maintaining a coherent strategy at the international level based on the respect of some universal principles.Originality/valueFew researches have been conducted on the CSR discourses and practices in France and in Brazil. This paper highlights the main characters of the CSR discourses and practices in both countries, while targeting their common points and differences.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Baden, D.A., Harwood, I.A. and Woodward, D.G. (2009), “The effect of buyer pressure on suppliers in SMEs to demonstrate CSR practice: an added incentive or counter productive?”, European Management Journal, Vol. 27 No. 6, pp. 429‐41.

Bansal, P. and Hunter, T. (2003), “Strategic explanations for the early adoption of ISO 14001”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 289‐99.

Beaujolin, F. and Capron, M. (2005), “France. Balancing between constructive harassment and virtuous intentions”, in Habisch, A., Jonker, J., Wegner, M. and Schmidpeter, R. (Eds), Corporate Social Responsibility across Europe, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp. 97‐108.

Bellard, E. and Rüling, C.C. (2001), “Importing diversity management: corporate discourses in France and Germany”, working paper, Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales, Université de Genève, Geneva.

Berthoin Antal, A. and Sobczak, A. (2007), “Corporate social responsibility in France: a mix of national traditions and international influences”, Business & Society, Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 9‐32.

Berthoin Antal, A., Oppen, M. and Sobczak, A. (2009), “(Re)discovering the social responsibility of business in Germany”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 89, pp. 285‐301.

Blomback, A. and Wigren, C. (2009), “Challenging the importance of size as determinant for CSR activities”, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 255‐70.

Capp, J., Elstrodt, H.‐P. and Jones, W.B. (2005), “Reining in Brazil's informal economy”, The McKinsey Quarterly, No. 1, pp. 9‐11.

Carroll, A.B. (1999), “Corporate social responsibility. Evolution of a definitional construct”, Business & Society, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 268‐95.

Chartier, D. and Déléage, J.‐P. (1998), “The international environmental NGOs: from the revolutionary alternative to the pragmatism of reform”, Environmental Politics, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 26‐41.

Damiano‐Teixeira, K.M. and Pompermayer, M.M. (2007), “Corporate social responsibility: profile and diagnosis of 797 programmes developed in Brazil”, Business & Society Review, Vol. 112 No. 3, pp. 343‐67.

Dubbink, W., Graefland, J. and Van Liedekerke, L. (2008), “CSR, transparency and the role of intermediate organizations”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 82 No. 2, pp. 391‐406.

Gavronski, I., Ferrer, G. and Paiva, E.L. (2008), “ISO certification in Brazil: motivations and benefits”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 87‐94.

Gilbert, D.U. and Rasche, A. (2007), “Discourse ethics and social accountability: the ethics of SA 8000”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 187‐216.

Gilbert, D. and Rasche, A. (2008), “Opportunities and problems of standardized ethics initiatives: a stakeholder theory perspective”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 82 No. 3, pp. 755‐73.

Griesse, M. (2007), “Caterpillar's interactions with Piracicaba, Brazil: a community‐based analysis of CSR”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 73 No. 1, pp. 39‐51.

Jonker, J. and Nijhof, A. (2006), “Looking through the eyes of others: assessing mutual expectations and experiences in order to shape dialogue and collaboration between business and NGOs with respect to CSR”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 456‐66.

Levy, D.L., Brown, H.S. and Jong, M. (2010), “The contested politics of corporate governance: the case of the global reporting initiative”, Business & Society, Vol. 49 No. 1, pp. 88‐115.

Matten, D. and Moon, J. (2008), “‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 404‐24.

Novethic (2009), Chiffres 2008 et analyse du marché français de l'ISR, Novethic, Paris, available at: www.novethic.fr/novethic/upload/etudes/Synthese_marche_ISR_2008.pdf.

Rasche, A. (2009), “‘A necessary supplement’: what the United Nations global compact is and is not”, Business & Society, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 511‐37.

Rasche, A. and Escudero, M. (2009), “Leading change. The role of the principles for responsible management education”, Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts‐ und Unternehmensethik, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 244‐50.

Rey, F. (1980), “Corporate social performance and reporting in France”, in Preston, L.E. (Ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 2, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 291‐325.

Schepers, D.H. (2006), “The impact of NGO network conflict on the corporate social responsibility strategies of multinational corporations”, Business & Society, Vol. 45 No. 3, pp. 282‐99.

Schmidheiny, S. (2006), “A view of corporate citizenship in Latin America”, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Spring, pp. 21‐4.

Schwartz, B. and Tilling, K. (2009), “‘ISO‐lating’ corporate social responsibility in the organizational context: a dissenting interpretation of ISO 26000”, Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 289‐99.

Simoes, C.P. (2008), Responsabilidade social e cidadania: conceitos e ferramentas, Serviço Social da Indústria (SESI), Brasilia.

Sobczak, A. (2003), “L'obligation de publier des informations sociales et environnementales dans le rapport annuel de gestion: une lecture critique de la loi NRE et de son décret d'application”, Semaine Juridique Entreprise, No. 14, pp. 598‐604.

Sobczak, A. (2006), “Are codes of conduct in global supply chains really voluntary? From soft law regulation of labour relations to consumer law”, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 167‐84.

Sobczak, A. (2007), “Legal dimensions of international framework agreements in the field of corporate social responsibility”, Relations Industrielles ‐ Industrial Relations, Vol. 62 No. 3, pp. 466‐91.

Sobczak, A. and Coelho Martins, L. (2010), “Educating young people from disadvantaged areas to help them to access jobs in the beauty sector. Some lessons from a partnership between L'Oréal and two Brazilian NGOs”, working paper, Institute for Global Responsibility, Nantes.

Stanziola Vieira, R. and Bétaille, J. (2008), “Grenelle de l'Environnement: is France making up for lost time?”, in Bosselmann, K., Engel, R. and Taylor, P. (Eds), Governance for Sustainability. Issues, Challenges, Successes, IUCN, Gland, pp. 201‐4.

Vivarta, V. and Canela, G. (2006), “Corporate social responsibility in Brazil. The role of the press as watchdog”, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, pp. 95‐106.

Wilson, A. and Pickard, S. (2007), “European Academy of Business in Society. Knowledge development, research and learning upgrade”, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, No. 25, pp. 109‐10.

WWF (2009), Rapport Partenariats Entreprises, WWF, Paris.

Berthoin Antal, A., Dierkes, M., MacMillan, K. and Marz, L. (2002), “Corporate social reporting revisited”, Journal of General Management, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 22‐42.