The evolving approach to the evaluation of low-gradient aortic stenosis

Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine - Tập 20 - Trang 197-201 - 2019
William B. Cutting1, Anthony A. Bavry1,2
1Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
2North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL, United States

Tài liệu tham khảo

Nishimura, 2014, 2014 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, J Am Coll Cardiol, 63, e57, 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.536

Clavel, 2017, Cardiac imaging for assessing low-gradient severe aortic stenosis, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 10, 185, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.01.002

Baumgartner, 2017, Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography, Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 18, 254, 10.1093/ehjci/jew335

Pibarot, 2012, Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal and depressed left ventricular ejection fraction, J Am Coll Cardiol, 60, 1845, 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.051

Ribeiro, 2018, Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the TOPAS-TAVI registry, J Am Coll Cardiol, 71, 1297, 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.054

Eleid, 2013, Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival, Circulation, 1781, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003695

Baumgartner, 2017, 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease, Eur Heart J, 38, 2739, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391

Hachicha, 2007, Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival, Circulation, 115, 2856, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668681

Baumgartner, 2017, Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the european association of cardiovascular imaging and the american society of echocardiography, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 30, 372, 10.1016/j.echo.2017.02.009

Rusinaru, 2015, Relation of dimensionless index to long-term outcome in aortic stenosis with preserved LVEF, J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 8, 766, 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.01.023

Clavel

Cueff, 2011, Measurement of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography: correlation with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction, Heart, 97, 721, 10.1136/hrt.2010.198853

Clavel, 2013, The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomography study, J Am Coll Cardiol, 62, 2329, 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1621

Bonow, 2017, J Am Coll Cardiol, 70, 2566, 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.018

Lloyd, 2017, Hemodynamic response to nitroprusside in patients with low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction, J Am Coll Cardiol, 70, 1339, 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.736

Saybolt, 2017, Low-flow severe aortic stenosis: evolving role of transcatheter aortic valve replacement, Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 10, 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.004838