The development of a conceptual model of student satisfaction with their experience in higher education

Emerald - Tập 16 Số 1 - Trang 19-35 - 2008
Jacqueline Douglas1, Robert McClelland1, John Davies2
1Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
2University of Salford, Salford, UK

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to introduce a conceptual model of student satisfaction with their higher education (HE) experience, based on the identification of the variable determinants of student perceived quality and the impact of those variables on student satisfaction and/or dissatisfaction with the overall student experience. The paper will also identify those determinants most likely to have either a positive or negative impact on subsequent student loyalty behaviours.Design/methodology/approachThis paper reports the results of a study of 163 undergraduate students at Liverpool John Moores University in the UK, which utilised Critical Incident Technique (CIT) as the method that encouraged the recording of situations that the students themselves perceive as critical incidents. It is envisaged that these situations have occurred in their experience of HE teaching, learning and assessment and their experience of other university ancillary service aspects, i.e. within and beyond the classroom experience.FindingsThe results of this study indicate that responsiveness, communication and access are the critical areas that Education Managers need to focus upon. Also the CIT method of data capture could be adapted and adopted by the wider Higher Education sector.Research limitations/implicationsThere are a number of limitations with this study. For the quantitative results, the sample size was relatively small and involved only one Faculty within a University. There is also an assumption that the statements made in relation to the loyalty behaviours would actually be acted upon, i.e. they would do what they say. The study is based on the respondents' recollections of past events and it is assumed that these were accurate.Practical implicationsThe implications for university managers are that creating and maintaining a responsive, communicative and useful environment is necessary across the teaching, learning and assessment areas, whilst within the Ancillary areas responsiveness, access and socialising are the important factors. Reducing the number of dissatisfying experiences may not be an easy task, but if successful, then improved student recruitment, retention and ultimately financial stability for the Institution should ensue. The wider implication is that CIT should be considered by HEIs as a means of collecting student intelligence.Originality/valueCritical Incident Technique is a method that is already attractive to many researchers. However, within higher education, the norm is to use traditional student feedback questionnaires which restricts the student to questions that have been predetermined. CIT allows respondents to freely describe their experiences and unreservedly express their feelings without being constrained to specific areas.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aldridge, S. and Rowley, J. (1998), “Measuring customer satisfaction in higher education”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 197‐204. Asthana, A. and Biggs, L. (2007), “Students pay more but receive less”, The Observer, 11 February. Banwet, D.K. and Datta, B. (2003), “A study of the effect of perceived lecture quality on post‐lecture intentions”, Work Study, Vol. 52 No. 5, pp. 234‐43. Bitner, M.J. (1990), “Evaluating service encounters: the effects of physical surroundings and employee responses”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, April, pp. 69‐82. Blackmore, J., Douglas, A. and Barnes, B. (2006), “Measuring student satisfaction at a UK university”, Journal for Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 251‐67. Bolton, R.N. and Drew, J.H. (1991), “A multistage model of customers' assessments of service quality and value”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17, March, pp. 375‐84. Cadotte, E.R. and Turgeon, N. (1988), “Dissatisfiers and satisfiers: suggestions for consumer complaints and compliments”, Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behaviour, Vol. 1, pp. 74‐9. Carlzon, J. (1989), Moments of Truth, reprint ed., HarperCollins, New York, NY. Crawford, F. (1991), “Total quality management”, Committee of Vice‐Chancellors and Principals, Occasional paper, London, December. Cronin, J.J. Jr and Taylor, S.A. (1992), “Measuring service quality: a re‐examination and extension”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, July, pp. 55‐68. Cuthbert, P.F. (1996), “Managing service quality in HE: is SERVQUAL the answer? Part 1”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 11‐16. Dale, B.G. (2003), Managing Quality, 4th ed., Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. Dion, P.A., Javalgi, R. and Dilorenzo‐Aiss, J. (1998), “An empirical assessment of the Zeithaml, Berry and Parasuraman Service Expectations Model”, The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 66‐86. Edvardsson, B. and Nilsson‐Wittel, L. (2004), “The role of satisfiers and dissatisfiers in the service encounter”, Proceedings of the 7th Quality Management and Organisational Development Conference, Monterrey, Mexico. Flanagan, J.C. (1954), “The critical incident technique”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 51 No. 4, pp. 327‐58. Galloway, L. (1998), “Quality perceptions of internal and external customers: a case study in educational administration”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 20‐6. Gremler, D.D. (2004), “The critical incident technique in service research”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 65‐89. HEFCE (2003), HEFCE Information on Quality and Standards in Higher Education: Final Guidance, HEFCE Publications, Bristol. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B. and Snyderman, B.B. (1959), Motivation to Work, Wiley, New York, NY. Hill, F.M. (1995), “Managing service quality in higher education: the role of the student as primary consumer”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 10‐21. Hoffman, K.D., Kelley, S.W. and Chung, B.C. (2003), “A CIT investigation of servicescape failures and associated recovery strategies”, Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 322‐40. Hoisington, S. and Naumann, E. (2003), “The loyalty elephant”, Quality Progress, February, pp. 33‐41. James, R., Baldwin, G. and McInnis, C. (1999), Which University? The Factors Influencing the Choices of Prospective Undergraduates, Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne. Johnston, R. (1995), “The determinants of service quality: satisfiers and dissatisfiers”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 6 No. 5, pp. 53‐71. Johnston, R. and Silvestro, R. (1990), “The determinants of service quality – a customer based approach”, The Proceedings of the Decision Science Institute Conference, San Diego, CA, November. Jones, T. and Sasser, W.E. (1995), “Why satisfied customers defect”, Harvard Business Review, November‐December, pp. 88‐99. Lee, H., Lee, Y. and Yoo, D. (2000), “The determinants of perceived service quality and its relationship with satisfaction”, Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 217‐31. Maddox, R.N. (1981), “Two‐factor theory and consumer satisfaction: replication and extension”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 8, June, pp. 97‐102. Normann, R. (1984), Service Management, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, p. 89. Palacio, A.B., Meneses, G.D. and PerezPerez, P.J. (2002), “The configuration of the university image and its relationship with the satisfaction of students”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 40 No. 5, pp. 486‐505. Parasuraman, A., Zeitaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. (1985), “A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49, pp. 41‐50. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. (1988), “SERVQUAL: A multiple‐item scale for measuring conumer perceptions of service quality”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 64 No. 1, pp. 12‐24. Rowley, J. (2003), “Retention: rhetoric or realistic agendas for the future of higher education”, The International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 248‐53. Spreng, R.A. and MacKoy, R.D. (1996), “An empirical examination of a model of perceived service quality and satisfaction”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 72 No. 2, pp. 201‐14. Swan, J.E. and Combs, L.J. (1976), “Product performance and consumer satisfaction: a new concept”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 40, April, pp. 25‐33. Van Riel, A.C.R., Semeijn, J. and Janssen, W. (2003), “E‐service quality expectations: a case study”, Total Quality Management, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 437‐50. Wong, A. and Sohal, A. (2003), “A critical incident approach to customer relationship management”, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 248‐62. Woodside, A.G., Frey, L.L. and Daly, R. (1989), “Linking service quality, customer satisfaction and behavioural intentions”, Journal of Healthcare Marketing, Vol. 9, December, pp. 5‐17. Wright, T. and Ngan, P. (2004), A New Social Contract: From Targets to Rights In Public Services, Fabian Society, London. Yorke, M. (1999), “Assuring quality and standards in globalised higher education”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 14‐24. Zeithaml, V.A. and Bitner, M.J. (2000), Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus Across the Firm, 2nd ed., McGraw‐Hill, Boston, MA.
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 16 Số 1

19-35

Thông tin tác giả