The cochrane databases of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in pregnancy, childbirth and neonatal care
Tài liệu tham khảo
Cochrane, 1979, a critical review of the medical profession, 2
Sackett, 1996, Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it is not, Br Med J, 312, 71, 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71
Enkin, 1995, Systematic summaries and dissemination of evidence: the Cochrane pregnancy and childbirth database, Semin Perinatol, 19, 155, 10.1016/S0146-0005(05)80036-9
Ohlsson, 1996, Randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews: a foundation for evidence-based practice, Acta Paediatr, 85, 647, 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1996.tb14116.x
Chalmers, 1989, Evaluating the effects of care during pregnancy and childbirth, Vol. 1, 3
Sackett, 1991
Schultz, 1995, Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials, JAMA, 273, 408, 10.1001/jama.1995.03520290060030
National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Quality of Care and Health Outcomes Committee, 1995, Guidelines for the Development and Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines
Crowther, 1996, Phenobarbital prior to preterm birth
Guyatt, 1993, Users guide to the medical literature II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid?, J Am Med Assoc, 270, 2598, 10.1001/jama.1993.03510210084032
Begg, 1996, Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement, JAMA, 276, 637, 10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030
Mulrow, 1994, Rationale for systematic reviews, Br Med J, 309, 597, 10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597
Mulrow, 1987, The medical review article: state of the science, Ann Intern Med, 104, 485, 10.7326/0003-4819-106-3-485
Crowley, 1996, Corticosteroids prior to preterm delivery
Oxman, 1994, Checklists for review articles, Br Med J, 309, 648, 10.1136/bmj.309.6955.648
1996
Thacker, 1996, Metaanalysis for the obstetrician-gynecologist, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 174, 1403, 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70580-X
1996, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
1996
1996
Cochrane, 1972
National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, 1985
1992
1989
1995
1992
Mosteller, 1993, Database medicine in the light of ECPC, Milbank Q, 71, 523, 10.2307/3350413
Cochrane, 1989, Forward to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, Vol. 1
1995
Sackett, 1995, Applying overviews and meta-analyses at the bedside, J Clin Epidemiol, 48, 61, 10.1016/0895-4356(94)00085-5
Paterson-Brown, 1995, Uptake of meta-analytical overviews of effective care in English obstetric units, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 102, 297, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09135.x
Hyde, 1995, Who uses the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Database?, Br Med J, 310, 1140, 10.1136/bmj.310.6987.1140b
Jordens, 1996, The use of systematic reviews by Australian neonatologists and obstetricians, A12
Woolf, 1992, Practice guidelines: a new reality in medicine. 1 Recent developments, Arch Intern Med, 150, 1811, 10.1001/archinte.1990.00390200025005
Effective Health Care, 1994
Antman, 1992, A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction, JAMA, 268, 240, 10.1001/jama.1992.03490020088036
Hayward, 1995, Users' guide to the medical literature. VII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. A. Are the recommendations valid?, JAMA, 274, 570, 10.1001/jama.1995.03530070068032
Irwig L, Zwarenstein M, Zwi A, Chalmers I. A flow diagram to help select interventions and research for healthcare. Bull WHO (in press)
Shin, 1993, Effect of problem-based, self directed undergraduate education on life-long learning, Can Med Assoc J, 148, 969
Jeffery, 1996, Competency-based learning in neonatology, Med Ed, 30, 440, 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1996.tb00865.x
Royal Australian College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 1995
Savulescu, 1996, Are ethics committees behaving ethically?, Br Med J, 313, 1390, 10.1136/bmj.313.7069.1390
Dickersin, 1992, Factors influencing publication of research results: follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards, JAMA, 263, 374, 10.1001/jama.1992.03480030052036
