Sulphur abatement globally in maritime shipping

H. Elizabeth Lindstad1, Carl Fredrik Rehn2, Gunnar S. Eskeland3
1Sintef Ocean AS (MARINTEK), Trondheim, Norway
2Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
3Norwegian School of Economics (NHH and SNF), Bergen, Norway

Tài liệu tham khảo

Acciaro, 2014, Real option analysis for environmental compliance: LNG and emission control areas, Transp. Res. Part D, 28, 41, 10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.007

BP, 2017. Statistical Review of World Energy June 2017.

Buhaug, 2009

Bunkerworld, 2016. Marine Bunker fuel Spot prices 2006–2015. Exported 6/11-2015, and updated 18/12-2016. <www.bunkerworld.com>.

Campling, P., Janssen, L., Vanherle, K., Cofala, J., Heyes, C., Sander, R., 2013. Specific evaluation of emissions from shipping including assessment for the establishment of possible new emission control areas in European Seas.

Concawe, 2009. Impact of marine fuels quality legislation on EU refineries at the 2020 horizon <https://www.concawe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/rpt_09-3-2009-01906-01-e-2.pdf>.

Concawe, 2012. EU refinery energy systems and efficiency. <https://www.concawe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/rpt_12-03-2012-01520-01-e.pdf>.

Concawe, 2016. MARINE FUEL FACTS. <https://www.concawe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/marine_factsheet_web.pdf>.

EnSys Energy and Navigistics Consulting, 2016. Supplemental marine fuel availability study. <https://www.ensysenergy.com/downloads/supplemental-marine-fuels-availability-study-2/>.

Faber, J. et al., 2016. Assessment of fuel oil availability – final report July 2016 for the International Maritime Organization. <www.cedelft.eu>.

Jiang, 2014, The costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil, Transp. Res. Part D, 28, 19, 10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.005

Johansson, 2013, The evolution of shipping emissions and the costs of regulation changes in the northern EU area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11375, 10.5194/acp-13-11375-2013

Lindstad, 2012, The importance of economies of scale for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from shipping, Energy Policy, 46, 386, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.077

Lindstad, 2015, Maritime shipping and emissions: a three-layered, damage based approach, Ocean Eng., 110, 94, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.09.029

Lloyd's Register, 2012. Understanding exhaust gas treatment systems - guidance for ship owners and operators.

Nelson, 1993, Differential environmental regulation: effects on electric utility capital turnover and emissions, Rev. Econ. Stat., 75, 368, 10.2307/2109447

Plain, C. Benazzi, E., Guillaume, D., 2006. Residue desulphurisation and conversion. Digitalrefining.com/article/1000275.

Purvin, Gertz, 2009. Impacts on the EU Refining Industry & markets of IMO specification changes & other measures to reduce the sulfur content of certain fuels. Study carried out for DG Environment.

Sea at Risk and CE Delft, 2010. Going Slow to Reduce Emissions. <www.seas-at-risk.org>.

Shell, 2016. The bunker fuels challenge: how should you respond? Technology trends to watch. <http://www.shell.com/business-customers/global-solutions/industry-focus/the-bunker-fuels-challenge.html>.

Shell, 2017. Technology trends to watch – an introduction. Emerging sector paradigms and their potential impacts on refining margins, strategy and technology. Shell Global Solutions. <http://www.shell.com/business-customers/global-solutions/industry-focus/technology-trends-to-watch.html>.

Smith et al., 2014. The Third IMO GHG Study. <Imo.org>.

US Energy Information Administration. Historical Fuel and Crude oil prices. <http://www.eia.gov/petroleum/>.

Wärtsilä, 2017. Personal communication with Stian Aakre at Wärtsilä Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems, which provided us with acquisition cost and operational cost and performance for scrubbers.