Study of the cost of mainly reusable equipment for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Kocakulah MC, Maier-Lytle J, Putnam T. Cutting costs in surgery. Rationalizing the use of surgical instruments can help hospitals stay competitive. Health Prog. 2001 Jan–Feb;82(1):38–41.

Slater M, Booth MI, Dehn TC. Cost-effective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 Nov;91(8):670–672.

Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Haller U. Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1995; 173(6): 1812–1815.

Demoulin l, Kesteloot K, Penninckx F. A cost comparison of disposable vs reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1996; 10(5): 520–525.

Adler S, Scherrer M, Rückauer K D, Daschner F D. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2005; 19(2): 268–272.

Thanapongsathorn W, Chaosukho T. Benefit of recycle disposable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Vajira medical Journal 1994; 38: 153–156.

Eddie G, White S. A comparison of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instrument costs. Aust N Z J Surg.1996 Oct; 66(10): 671–675.

Apelgren K N, Blank M L, Slomski C A, Hadjis N S. Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 02/1994; 8(1): 32–34.

Maharaj S R. An investigation into the cost-effectiveness of re-usable instrumentation in minimal access surgery. Graduate School of Business-Faculty of Management: University of Natal; 2003.

Paolucci V, Schaeff B, Gutt C N, Encke A. Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1995 Apr–Jun; 3(2–3): 147–150.