Stimulation ovarienne à fortes doses de gonadotrophines en FIV : étude rétrospective cas-témoin au CHU de Nantes
Tài liệu tham khảo
Dewailly, 2014, The physiology and clinical utility of anti-Müllerian hormone in women, Hum Reprod Update, 20, 370, 10.1093/humupd/dmt062
Ferraretti, 2011, ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria, Hum Reprod, 26, 1616, 10.1093/humrep/der092
Nargund, 2007, The ISMAAR proposal on terminology for ovarian stimulation for IVF, Hum Reprod, 22, 2801, 10.1093/humrep/dem285
Davis, 2014, IVF stimulation: protocols for poor responders, Methods Mol Biol, 1154, 329, 10.1007/978-1-4939-0659-8_15
Ubaldi, 2014, Management of poor responders in IVF: is there anything new?, Biomed Res Int, 2014, 352098, 10.1155/2014/352098
Tarlatzis, 2007, GnRH agonists vs antagonists, Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 21, 57, 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.08.002
Dorn, 2005, FSH: what is the highest dose for ovarian stimulation that makes sense on an evidence-based level?, Reprod Biomed Online, 11, 555, 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61163-7
Kailasam, 2004, Defining poor ovarian response during IVF cycles, in women aged<40years, and its relationship with treatment outcome, Hum Reprod, 19, 1544, 10.1093/humrep/deh273
Berkkanoglu, 2010, What is the optimum maximal gonadotropin dosage used in microdose flare-up cycles in poor responders?, Fertil Steril, 94, 662, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.027
Klinkert, 2005, Expected poor responders on the basis of an antral follicle count do not benefit from a higher starting dose of gonadotrophins in IVF treatment: a randomized controlled trial, Hum Reprod, 20, 611, 10.1093/humrep/deh663
Youssef, 2012, Hum Reprod, 27, ii302
Confino, 2004, GnRHa flare and IVF pregnancy rates, Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 85, 36, 10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00344-8
Monceau, 2012, 450IU versus 600IU of gonadotropins in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF): preliminary report of a randomized controlled trial. [abstract] Proceedings of the ASRM 68th Annual Meeting, 20 October 2012–24 October 2012, San Diego, CA, USA, Fertil Steril, 98, S77, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.278
Haas, 2015, Do poor-responder patients benefit from increasing the daily gonadotropin dose during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF?, Gynecol Endocrinol, 31, 79, 10.3109/09513590.2014.959919
Revelli, 2014, “Mild” vs “long” protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in patients with expected poor ovarian responsiveness undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF): a large prospective randomized trial, J Assist Reprod Genet, 31, 809, 10.1007/s10815-014-0227-y
Yoo, 2011, Comparison of mild ovarian stimulation with conventional ovarian stimulation in poor responders, Clin Exp Reprod Med, 38, 159, 10.5653/cerm.2011.38.3.159
Matsaseng, 2013, Mild ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: are we ready to change? A meta-analysis, Gynecol Obstet Invest, 76, 233, 10.1159/000355980
Polyzos, 2012, Live birth rates following natural cycle IVF in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria, Hum Reprod, 27, 3481, 10.1093/humrep/des318
Nardo, 2013, Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation regimens: a review of the available evidence for clinical practice. Produced on behalf of the BFS Policy and Practice Committee, Hum Fertil (Camb), 16, 144, 10.3109/14647273.2013.795385
Fan, 2013, Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone supplementation in poor responders undergoing IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Gynecol Endocrinol, 29, 278, 10.3109/09513590.2012.743016
Bosdou, 2012, The use of androgens or androgen-modulating agents in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Hum Reprod Update, 18, 127, 10.1093/humupd/dmr051
Xu, 2014, Effect of dehydroepiandrosterone administration in patients with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria, PLoS One, 9, e99858, 10.1371/journal.pone.0099858
Massin, 2006, Effects of transdermal testosterone application on the ovarian response to FSH in poor responders undergoing assisted reproduction technique–a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, Hum Reprod, 21, 1204, 10.1093/humrep/dei481
Boulet, 2015, Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection, JAMA, 313, 255, 10.1001/jama.2014.17985