A mild treatment strategy for in-vitro fertilisation: a randomised non-inferiority trial

The Lancet - Tập 369 - Trang 743-749 - 2007
Esther MEW Heijnen1,2, Marinus JC Eijkemans1,3, Cora De Klerk4, Suzanne Polinder4,3, Nicole GM Beckers2, Ellen R Klinkert1, Frank J Broekmans1, Jan Passchier4, Egbert R Te Velde1, Nick S Macklon1,2, Bart CJM Fauser1,2
1Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, Netherlands
2Division of Reproductive Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
3Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
4Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Tài liệu tham khảo

Macklon, 2006, The science behind 25 years of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization, Endocr Rev, 27, 170, 10.1210/er.2005-0015 Fauser, 1999, Minimal ovarian stimulation for IVF: appraisal of potential benefits and drawbacks, Hum Reprod, 14, 2681, 10.1093/humrep/14.11.2681 Delvigne, 2003, Review of clinical course and treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), Hum Reprod Update, 9, 77, 10.1093/humupd/dmg005 Fauser, 2005, Multiple birth resulting from ovarian stimulation for subfertility treatment, Lancet, 365, 1807, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66478-1 Huirne, 2004, Contemporary pharmacological manipulation in assisted reproduction, Drugs, 64, 297, 10.2165/00003495-200464030-00005 Fauser, 1997, Manipulation of human ovarian function: physiological concepts and clinical consequences, Endocr Rev, 18, 71 Hohmann, 2003, J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 88, 166, 10.1210/jc.2002-020788 Al Inany, 2002, GnRH antagonist in assisted reproduction: a Cochrane review, Hum Reprod, 17, 874, 10.1093/humrep/17.4.874 Kolibianakis, 2006, Among patients treated for IVF with gonadotrophins and GnRH analogues, is the probability of live birth dependent on the type of analogue used? A systematic review and meta-analysis, Hum Reprod Update, 12, 651, 10.1093/humupd/dml038 Olivius, 2004, Why do couples discontinue in vitro fertilization treatment? A cohort study, Fertil Steril, 81, 258, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.06.029 Collins, 2002, An international survey of the health economics of IVF and ICSI, Hum Reprod Update, 8, 265, 10.1093/humupd/8.3.265 Kjellberg, 2006, Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis, Hum Reprod, 21, 210, 10.1093/humrep/dei298 Pandian, 2005, Number of embryos for transfer after IVF and ICSI: a Cochrane review, Hum Reprod, 20, 2681, 10.1093/humrep/dei153 Thurin, 2004, Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization, N Engl J Med, 351, 2392, 10.1056/NEJMoa041032 Lukassen, 2005, Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial, Hum Reprod, 20, 702, 10.1093/humrep/deh672 Gerris, 2005, Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal, Hum Reprod Update, 11, 105, 10.1093/humupd/dmh049 Heijnen, 2004, What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The next step to improving outcomes of IVF: consider the whole treatment, Hum Reprod, 19, 1936, 10.1093/humrep/deh368 Eijkemans, 2006, Comparison of different treatment strategies in IVF with cumulative live birth over a given period of time as the primary end-point: methodological considerations on a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, Hum Reprod, 21, 344, 10.1093/humrep/dei332 Gold, 1996 Gerris, 1999, Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial, Hum Reprod, 14, 2581, 10.1093/humrep/14.10.2581 Leonard, 1998, Depression and anxiety disorders during multiple pregnancy and parenthood, J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, 27, 329, 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02656.x Min, 2004, What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction, Hum Reprod, 19, 3, 10.1093/humrep/deh028 Stolwijk, 2000, Cumulative probability of achieving an ongoing pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection according to a woman's age, subfertility diagnosis and primary or secondary subfertility, Hum Reprod, 15, 203, 10.1093/humrep/15.1.203 de Klerk, 2006, The psychological impact of mild ovarian stimulation combined with single embryo transfer compared with conventional IVF, Hum Reprod, 21, 721, 10.1093/humrep/dei395 Wolner-Hanssen, 1998, Cost-effectiveness analysis of in-vitro fertilization: estimated costs per successful pregnancy after transfer of one or two embryos, Hum Reprod, 13, 88, 10.1093/humrep/13.1.88 De Sutter, 2002, A health-economic decision-analytic model comparing double with single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI, Hum Reprod, 17, 2891, 10.1093/humrep/17.11.2891 Petrou, 2001, The long-term costs of preterm birth and low birth weight: results of a systematic review, Child Care Health Dev, 27, 97, 10.1046/j.1365-2214.2001.00203.x Vail, 2003, Common statistical errors in the design and analysis of subfertility trials, Hum Reprod, 18, 1000, 10.1093/humrep/deg133 Johnson, 2003, Gaps in the evidence for fertility treatment-an analysis of the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group database, Hum Reprod, 18, 947 Romond, 2005, Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer, N Engl J Med, 353, 1673, 10.1056/NEJMoa052122 Saldeen, 2005, Would legislation imposing single embryo transfer be a feasible way to reduce the rate of multiple pregnancies after IVF treatment?, Hum Reprod, 20, 4, 10.1093/humrep/deh610 Jain, 2002, Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization, N Engl J Med, 347, 661, 10.1056/NEJMsa013491