Sketching sustainable land use in Europe by 2040: a multi-stakeholder participatory approach to elicit cross-sectoral visions
Tóm tắt
The continuously growing global demands on a finite land resource will require better strategic policies and management of trade-offs to avoid conflicts between different land-use sectors. Visions of the future can support strategic planning by stimulating dialogue, building a consensus on shared priorities and providing long-term targets. We present a novel approach to elicit stakeholder visions of future desired land use, which was applied with a broad range of experts to develop cross-sectoral visions in Europe. The approach is based on (i) combination of software tools and facilitation techniques to stimulate engagement and creativity; (ii) methodical selection of stakeholders; (iii) use of land attributes to deconstruct the multifaceted sectoral visions into land-use changes that can be clustered into few cross-sectoral visions, and (iv) a rigorous iterative process. Three cross-sectoral visions of sustainable land use in Europe in 2040 emerged from applying the approach in participatory workshops involving experts in nature conservation, recreation, agriculture, forestry, settlements, energy, and water. The three visions—Best Land in Europe, Regional Connected and Local Multifunctional—shared a wish to achieve a land use that is sustainable through multifunctionality, resource use efficiency, controlled urban growth, rural renewal and widespread nature. However, they differ on the scale at which land services are provided—EU-wide, regional or local—reflecting the land-sparing versus land-sharing debate. We discuss the usefulness of the approach, as well as the challenges posed and solutions offered by the visions to support strategic land-use planning.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Appleton K, Lovett A (2003) GIS-based visualisation of rural landscapes: defining ‘sufficient’ realism for environmental decision-making. Landscape Urban Plann 65:117–131 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00245-1
Bhowmick T (2006) Building an exploratory visual analysis tool for qualitative researchers. Proc AutoCarto, Vancouver, WA 10(1):1.66.503
Brown I, Castellazzi M (2014) Changes in climate variability with reference to land quality and agriculture in Scotland. Int J Biometeorol 59(6):717–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-014-0882-9
Bryant FB, Veroff J (2007) Savoring: a new model of positive experience. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Buijs AE, Pedroli B, Luginbühl Y (2006) From hiking through farmland to farming in a leisure landscape: changing social perceptions of the European landscape. Landsc Ecol 21(3):375–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-005-5223-2
Cumming GS, Buerkert A, Hoffmann EM, Schlecht E, Von Cramon-Taubadel S, Tscharntke T (2014) Implications of agricultural transitions and urbanization for ecosystem services. Nature 515(7525):50–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13945
EEA (2001) Designing effective assessments: the role of participation, science and governance, and focus. Experts corner by Noelle Eckley, Environmental issue report No.26, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen ISBN: 92–9167–404-4
EEA (2016) Sustainability transitions: now for the long term. Eionet report | No 1/2016, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen doi:https://doi.org/10.2800/096291
Ellis EC (2011) Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 369(1938):1010–1035. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0331
Faysse N, Rinaudo JD, Bento S, Richard-Ferroudji A, Errahj M, Varanda M, Imache A, Dionnet M, Rollin D, Garin P, Kuper M, Maton L, Montginoul M (2014) Participatory analysis for adaptation to climate change in Mediterranean agricultural systems: possible choices in process design. Reg Environ Chang 14(S1):S57–S70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-012-0362-x
Fischer J, Abson DJ, Butsic V, Chappell MJ, Ekroos J, Hanspach J, Kuemmerle T, Smith HG, von Wehrden H (2014) Land sparing versus land sharing: moving forward. Con Lett 7(3):149–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12084
Gramberger M, Zellmer K, Kok K, Metzger MJ (2014) Stakeholder integrated research (STIR): a new approach tested in climate change adaptation research. Clim Chang 128(3-4):201–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1225-x
Grant JB, Suddendorf (2005) Recalling yesterday and predicting tomorrow. Cogn Dev 20(3):362–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.05.002
Guerry AD, Polasky S, Lubchenco J, Chaplin-Kramer R, Daily GC, Griffin R, Ruckelshaus M, Bateman IJ, Duraiappah A, Elmqvist T, Feldman MW, Folke C, Hoekstra J, Kareiva PM, Keeler BL, Li S, McKenzie E, Ouyang Z, Reyers B, Ricketts TH, Rockström J, Tallis H, Vira B (2015) Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: from promise to practice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(24):7348–7355. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503751112
Helming K, Diehl K, Kuhlman T, Jansson T, Verburg PH, Bakker M, Pérez-Soba M, Jonese L, Verkerk PJ, Tabbush P, Morris J, Drillet Z, Farrington J, Le Mouël P, Zagame P, Stuczynskik T, Siebieleck G, Wiggering H (2011) Ex-ante impact assessment of policies effecting land use—B: application of the analytical framework. Ecol Soc 16(1):29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03840-160129
Howlett M (2007) Analyzing multi-actor, multi-round public policy decision-making processes in government: findings from five Canadian cases. Can J Polit Sci 40:659–684 doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423907070746, 03
Jepsen MR, Kuemmerle T, Müller D, Erb K, Verburg PH, Haberl H, Vesterager JP, Andrič M, Antrop M, Austrheim G, Björn I, Bondeau A, Bürgi M, Bryson J, Caspar G, Cassar LF, Conrad E, Chromý P, Daugirdas V, Van Eetvelde V, Elena-Rosselló R, Gimmi U, Izakovicova Z, Jančák V, Jansson U, Kladnik D, Kozak J, Konkoly-Gyuró E, Krausmann F, Mander Ü, McDonagh J, Pärn J, Niedertscheider M, Nikodemus O, Ostapowicz K, Pérez-Soba M, Pinto-Correia T, Ribokas G, Rounsevell M, Schistou D, Schmit C, Terkenli TS, Tretvik AM, Trzepacz P, Vadineanu A, Walz A, Zhllima E, Reenberg A (2015) Transitions in European land-management regimes between 1800 and 2010. Land Use Policy 49:53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.003
Kok K, Bärlund I, Flörke M, Holman I, Gramberger M, Sendzimir J, Stuch B, Zellmer K (2015) European participatory scenario development: strengthening the link between stories and models. Clim Chang 128(3-4):187–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1143-y
Koomen E, Koekoek A, Dijk E (2011) Simulating land-use change in a regional planning context. Appli Spat Anal Policy 4(4):223–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-010-9053-5
Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P (2011) Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. PNAS 108:3465–3472. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100480108
Lotze-Campen, H, Verburg, PH, Popp, A, Lindner, M, Verkerk, PJ, Moiseyev, A, Schrammeijer, E, Helming, J, Tabeau, A, Schulp, CJE, van der Zanden, EH, Lavalle, C, Silva, FB, Walz, A, Bodirsky, B (2017) A cross-scale impact assessment of European nature protection policies under contrasting future socio-economic pathways. Reg Environ Chang 1–12 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1167-8
Metzger MJ, Murray-Rust D, Houtkamp J, Jensen, A, La Riviere, I, Paterson, JS, Pérez-Soba, M, Valluri-Nitsch, C (2017) How do Europeans want to live in 2040? Citizen visions and their consequences for European land use. Reg Environ Chang doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1091-3
Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, Grübler A, Jung TY, Kram T, La Rovere EL, Michaelis L, Mori S, Morita T, Pepper W, Pitcher H, Price L, Raihi K, Roehrl A, Rogner HH, Sankovski A, Schlesinger M, Shukla P, Smith S, Swart R, Van Rooijen S, Victor N, Dadi Z (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios. Working group III, intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press
Ogilvy J (1992) Future studies and the human sciences: the case for normative scenarios. Futur Res Q 8(2): 5–65
Pedroli B, Rounsevell M, Metzger M, Paterson J, and the VOLANTE consortium (2015) The VOLANTE roadmap towards sustainable land resource management in Europe. VOLANTE final project document, Alterra Wageningen UR, p 24 ISBN 978-94-6257-407-6
Pérez-Soba M, Petit S, Jones L, Bertrand N, Briquel V, Omodei-Zorini L, Contini C, Helming K, Farrington JH, Tinacci Mossello M, Wascher D, Kienast F, De Groot R (2008) Land use functions : a multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability. Helming K, Pérez-Soba M, Tabbush P (Eds) Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes: 375-404; Berlin (Springer) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78648-1_19
Pérez-Soba M, Maas R (2015) Scenarios: tools for coping with complexity and future uncertainty? . In: Jordan AJ, Turnpenny JR (eds) The tools of policy formulation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. http://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781783477036.xml, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783477043.00014
Rockstrom J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin FS, Lambin E, Lenton T, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber H, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sorlin S, Snyder P, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry V, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley J (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461(7263):472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a
Rounsevell MDA, Metzger MJ (2010) Developing qualitative scenario storylines for environmental change assessment. Wil Inter Rev. Clim Change 1:606–619. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.63
Schoonenboom J (2003) Toekomstscenarios en beleid, tijdschrift voor Belied Politiek en Maatschappij 30:212–217, 4, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1347/benm.30.4.212.25076
Shipley R, Michela JL (2006) Can vision motivate planning action? Plann Prac Res 21(2):223–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450600944715
Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, De Vries W, De Wit CA, Folke C, Gerten D, Heinke J, Mace GM, Persson LM, Ramanathan V, Reyers B, Sörlin S (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347 doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855, 6223, 1259855
Swart R, Raskin P, Robinson J (2004) The problem of the future: sustainability science and scenario analysis. Glob Environm Change-Human Policy Dimens 14(2):137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.002
Tonn JC (2003) Mary P. Follett: creating democracy, transforming management. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300096217.001.0001
United Nations (2015) World population prospects: the 2015 revision, key findings and advance tables. New York. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.241
Van der Heijden K (2005) Scenarios : the art of strategic conversation. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, UK ISBN 0-470–02368-6
Verburg P, Eickhout B, van Meijl H (2008) A multi-scale, multi-model approach for analyzing the future dynamics of European land use. Ann Reg Sci 42:57–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0136-4
Verkerk PJ, Lindner M, Pérez-Soba M, Paterson JS, Helming J, Verburg PH, Kuemmerle T, Lotze-Campen H, Moiseyev A, Müller D, Popp A, Schulp CJE, Stürck J, Tabeau A, Wolfslehner B, van der Zanden EH (2016) Identifying pathways to visions of future land use in Europe. Reg Env Change DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1055-7
Vervoort JM, Kok K, van Lammeren R, Veldkamp T (2010) Stepping into futures: exploring the potential of interactive media for participatory scenarios on social-ecological systems. Futures 42(6):604–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.04.031
Volkery A, Ribeiro T, Henrichs T, Hoogeveen Y (2008) Your vision or my mode? Lessons from participatory land use scenario development on a European scale. Syst Pract Action Res 21:459–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-008-9104-x
Wang C, Miller D, Brown I, Jiang Y, Castellazzi M (2016) Visualisation techniques to support public interpretation of future climate change and land-use choices: a case study from N-E Scotland. Int J Digital Earth, 9:6, 586–605 doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2015.1111949
Wiedmann TO, Schandl H, Lenzen M, Moran D, Suh S, West J, Kanemoto K (2015) The material footprint of nations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(20):6271–6276. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220362110