Hình ảnh trực quan tự tạo ảnh hưởng đến hiệu ứng chỉ tiếp xúc

Bargh, J. A. (2001). The psychology of the mere. In J. A. Bargh & D. K. Apsley (Eds.),Unraveling the complexities of social life: A festschrift in honor of Robert B. Zajonc (pp. 25–37). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Bonanno, G. A., &Stillings, N. A. (1986). Preference, familiarity, and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes.American Journal of Psychology,99, 403–415.

Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987.Psychological Bulletin,106, 265–289.

Bornstein, R. F. (1992). Subliminal mere exposure effects. In R. F. Bornstein & T. S. Pittman (Eds.),Perception without awareness: Cognitive, clinical, and social perspectives (pp. 191–210). New York: Guilford.

Bornstein, R. F., &D’Agostino, P. R. (1994). The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect.Social Cognition,12, 103–128.

Chambers, D., &Reisberg, D. (1985). Can mental images be ambiguous?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 317–328.

Cohen, J. (1990).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Compton, R. J., Williamson, S., Murphy, S. G., &Heller, W. (2002). Hemispheric differences in affective response: Effects of mere exposure.Social Cognition,20, 1–17.

Gopnik, A., &Rosati, A. (2001). Duck or rabbit? Reversing ambiguous figures and understanding ambiguous representations.Developmental Science,4, 175–183.

Harmon-Jones, E., &Allen, J. J. B. (2001). The role of affect in the mere exposure effect: Evidence from psychophysiological and individual differences approaches.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,27, 889–898.

Hill, W. F. (1978). Effects of mere exposure on preferences in nonhuman animals.Psychological Bulletin,85, 1177–1198.

Klinger, M. R., &Greenwald, A. G. (1994). Preferences need no inferences? The cognitive basis of unconscious mere exposure effects. In P. M. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.),The heart’s eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 67–85). Orlando: Academic Press.

Kunst-Wilson, W. R., &Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized.Science,207, 557–558.

Lee, A. Y. (2001). The mere exposure effect: An uncertainty reduction explanation revisited.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,27, 1255–1266.

Lee, M. A., Sundberg, J. L., &Bernstein, I. H. (1993). Concurrent processes: The affect—cognition relationship within the context of the “mere exposure” phenomenon.Perception & Psychophysics,54, 33–42.

Mandler, G., Nakamura, Y., &Van Zandt, B. J. (1987). Nonspecific effects of exposure on stimuli that cannot be recognized.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 646–648.

Monahan, J. L., Murphy, S. T., &Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general, and diffuse effects.Psychological Science,11, 462–466.

Murphy, S. T., Monahan, J. L., &Zajonc, R. B. (1995). Additivity of nonconscious affect: Combined effects of priming and exposure.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,69, 589–602.

Murphy, S. T., &Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,64, 723–739.

Perlman, D., &Oskamp, S. (1971). The effects of picture content and exposure frequency on evaluations of Negroes and whites.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,7, 503–514.

Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2002). Mental imagery: In search of a theory.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,25, 157–237.

Rhodes, G., Halberstadt, J., &Brajkovich, G. (2001). Generalization of mere exposure effects to averaged composite faces.Social Cognition,19, 57–70.

Seamon, J. G., Brody, N., &Kauff, D. M. (1983). Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: II. Effect of delay between study and test.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,21, 187–189.

Seamon, J. G., &Delgado, M. R. (1999). Recognition memory and affective preference for depth-rotated solid objects: Part-based structural descriptions may underlie the mere exposure effect.Visual Cognition,6, 145–164.

Seamon, J. G., Ganor-Stern, D., Crowley, M. J., Wilson, S. M., Weber, W. J., O’Rourke, C. M., &Mahoney, J. K. (1997). A mere exposure effect for transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of reflection, size, or color changes on affect and recognition.Memory & Cognition,25, 367–374.

Seamon, J. G., McKenna, P. A., &Binder, N. (1998). The mere exposure effect is differentially sensitive to different judgment tasks.Consciousness & Cognition,7, 85–102.

Wang, M. Y., &Chang, H. C. (2004). The mere exposure effect and recognition memory.Cognition & Emotion,18, 1055–1078.

Winkielman, P., &Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,81, 989–1000.

Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology Monographs,9(2, Pt. 2), 1–27.

Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.American Psychologist,31, 151–175.

Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal.Current Directions in Psychological Science,10, 224–228.

Zajonc, R. B., Markus, H., &Wilson, W. R. (1974). Exposure effects and associative learning.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,10, 248–263.

Zárate, M. A., Sanders, J. D., &Garza, A. A. (2000). Neurological dissociations of social perception processes.Social Cognition,18, 223–251.