Risk of revision and dislocation in single, dual mobility and large femoral head total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and network meta-analysis
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Epinette JA, Harwin SF, Rowan FE, Tracol P, Mont MA, Chughtai M, Westrich GH (2017) Early experience with dual mobility acetabular systems featuring highly cross-linked polyethylene liners for primary hip arthroplasty in patients under fifty five years of age: an international multi-centre preliminary study. Int Orthop 41(3):543–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3367-0
Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(1):128–133. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.h.00155
de Steiger RN, Miller LN, Davidson DC, Ryan P, Graves SE (2013) Joint registry approach for identification of outlier prostheses. Acta Orthop 84(4):348–352. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.831320
Lubbeke A, Roussos C, Barea C, Kohnlein W, Hoffmeyer P (2012) Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients 80 years or older. J Arthroplasty 27(6):1041–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.11.023
Lebeau N, Bayle M, Belahouane R, Chelli M, Havet E, Brunschweiler B, Mertl P (2017) Total hip arthroplasty revision by dual-mobility acetabular cup cemented in a metal reinforcement: a 62 case series at a minimum 5 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.04.009
Chalmers BP, Arsoy D, Sierra RJ, Lewallen DG, Trousdale RT (2016) High failure rate of modular exchange with a specific design of a constrained liner in high-risk patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31(9):1963–1969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.021
Beaule PE, Ebramzadeh E, Le Duff M, Prasad R, Amstutz HC (2004) Cementing a liner into a stable cementless acetabular shell: the double-socket technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-a(5):929–934
Callaghan JJ, Parvizi J, Novak CC, Bremner B, Shrader W, Lewallen DG, Johnston RC, Goetz DD (2004) A constrained liner cemented into a secure cementless acetabular shell. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-a(10):2206–2211
Shapiro GS, Weiland DE, Markel DC, Padgett DE, Sculco TP, Pellicci PM (2003) The use of a constrained acetabular component for recurrent dislocation. J Arthroplasty 18(3):250–258. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2003.50090
Leiber-Wackenheim F, Brunschweiler B, Ehlinger M, Gabrion A, Mertl P (2011) Treatment of recurrent THR dislocation using of a cementless dual-mobility cup: a 59 cases series with a mean 8 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surgery Res 97(1):8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2010.08.003
Hamadouche M, Biau DJ, Huten D, Musset T, Gaucher F (2010) The use of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(12):3248–3254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1404-7
McKee GK, Watson-Farrar J (1966) Replacement of arthritic hips by the McKee-Farrar prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 48(2):245–259
Charnley J (1972) The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br 54(1):61–76
Lautridou C, Lebel B, Burdin G, Vielpeau C (2008) Survival of the cementless Bousquet dual mobility cup: minimum 15-year follow-up of 437 total hip arthroplasties. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 94(8):731–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rco.2008.06.001
Tarasevicius S, Smailys A, Grigaitis K, Robertsson O, Stucinskas J (2017) Short-term outcome after total hip arthroplasty using dual-mobility cup: report from Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register. Int Orthop 41(3):595–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3389-7
Clavé A, Maurer D, Tristan L, Dubrana F, Lefèvre C, Pandit H (2016) Midterm survivorship of the Lefèvre constrained liner: a consecutive multisurgeon series of 166 cases. J Arthroplasty 31(9):1970–1978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.031
Gonzalez AI, Bartolone P, Lubbeke A, Dupuis Lozeron E, Peter R, Hoffmeyer P, Christofilopoulos P (2017) Comparison of dual-mobility cup and unipolar cup for prevention of dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 88(1):18–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1255482
Hamadouche M, Ropars M, Rodaix C, Musset T, Gaucher F, Biau D, Courpied JP, Huten D (2017) Five to thirteen year results of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation. Int Orthop 41(3):513–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3343-8
Mohaddes M, Cnudde P, Rolfson O, Wall A, Karrholm J (2017) Use of dual-mobility cup in revision hip arthroplasty reduces the risk for further dislocation: analysis of seven hundred and ninety one first-time revisions performed due to dislocation, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Int Orthop 41(3):583–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3381-2
Velotta T, McGrorya BJ, Ranab A (2015) A second generation constrained acetabular component for treatment of complex hip replacement instability. Curr Orthop Pract 26(2):136–141. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000000201
Viste A, Desmarchelier R, Fessy MH (2017) Dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 41(3):535–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3363-4
Prudhon JL, Desmarchelier R, Hamadouche M, Delaunay C, Verdier R (2017) Causes for revision of dual-mobility and standard primary total hip arthroplasty: matched case–control study based on a prospective multicenter study of two thousand and forty four implants. Int Orthop 41(3):455–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3064-4
Hernigou P, Auregan JC, Potage D, Roubineau F, Flouzat Lachaniette CH, Dubory A (2017) Dual-mobility implants prevent hip dislocation following hip revision in obese patients. Int Orthop 41(3):469–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3316-y
Catelli DS, Kowalski E, Beaule PE, Lamontagne M (2017) Does the dual-mobility hip prosthesis produce better joint kinematics during extreme hip flexion task? The Journal of arthroplasty. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.049
Jauregui JJ, Pierce TP, Elmallah RK, Cherian JJ, Delanois RE, Mont MA (2016) Dual mobility cups: an effective prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasties for preventing dislocations. Hip Int 26(1):57–61. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000295
Homma Y, Baba T, Kobayashi H, Desroches A, Ochi H, Ozaki Y, Matsumoto M, Yuasa T, Kaneko K (2016) Benefit and risk in short term after total hip arthroplasty by direct anterior approach combined with dual mobility cup. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26(6):619–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1808-5
Hernigou P, Auregan JC, Potage D, Roubineau F, Flouzat Lachaniette CH, Dubory A (2016) Dual-mobility implants prevent hip dislocation following hip revision in obese patients. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3316-y
Griffin XL, Parsons N, Achten J, Costa ML (2016) A randomised feasibility study comparing total hip arthroplasty with and without dual mobility acetabular component in the treatment of displaced intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur: the Warwick Hip Trauma Evaluation Two: WHiTE Two. Bone Joint J 98-b(11):1431–1435. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b11.bjj-2016-0478.r1
Haughom BD, Plummer DR, Moric M, Della Valle CJ (2016) Is there a benefit to head size greater than 36 mm in total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 31(1):152–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.011
Tarasevičius S, Robertsson O, Dobozinskas P, Wingstrand H (2013) A comparison of outcomes and dislocation rates using dual articulation cups and THA for intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Hip Int 23(1):22–26. https://doi.org/10.5301/HIP.2013.10632
Tarasevicius S, Busevicius M, Robertsson O, Wingstrand H (2010) Dual mobility cup reduces dislocation rate after arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:175. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-175
Bouchet R, Mercier N, Saragaglia D (2011) Posterior approach and dislocation rate: a 213 total hip replacements case-control study comparing the dual mobility cup with a conventional 28-mm metal head/polyethylene prosthesis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(1):2–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2010.07.008
Altman DG, Bland JM (2003) Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates. BMJ 326(7382):219
Palmer TMPJ, Sutton AJ, Moreno SG (2008) Contour-enhanced funnel plots in meta-analysis. Stata J 8(2):242–254
Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L (2008) Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. J Clin Epidemiol 61(10):991–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634
White IR (2011) Multivariate random-effects meta-regression: updates to mvmeta. Stata J 11(2):255–270
StataCorp. (2014) Stata 14 base reference manual. Stata Press, College Station