Review: Electronic Health Records and the Reliability and Validity of Quality Measures: A Review of the Literature

Medical Care Research and Review - Tập 67 Số 5 - Trang 503-527 - 2010
Kitty S. Chan1, Jinnet B. Fowles2, Jonathan P. Weiner3
1Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. [email protected]
2Park Nicollet Institute, Minneapolis, MN
3Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD

Tóm tắt

Previous reviews of research on electronic health record (EHR) data quality have not focused on the needs of quality measurement. The authors reviewed empirical studies of EHR data quality, published from January 2004, with an emphasis on data attributes relevant to quality measurement. Many of the 35 studies reviewed examined multiple aspects of data quality. Sixty-six percent evaluated data accuracy, 57% data completeness, and 23% data comparability. The diversity in data element, study setting, population, health condition, and EHR system studied within this body of literature made drawing specific conclusions regarding EHR data quality challenging. Future research should focus on the quality of data from specific EHR components and important data attributes for quality measurement such as granularity, timeliness, and comparability. Finally, factors associated with poor or variability in data quality need to be better understood and effective interventions developed.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1136/ard.2008.089318

10.1111/j.1945-1474.2008.tb01151.x

10.7326/0003-4819-146-4-200702200-00006

10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00007

10.1097/01.mlr.0000167185.26058.8e

10.1080/14622200500078089

10.1177/1077558709332440

10.1016/j.puhe.2004.10.018

10.1093/pubmed/fdh104

10.1056/NEJMsa0802005

Faulconer, E.R., 2004, Informatics in Primary Care, 12, 243

10.1177/1077558704267512

10.2471/BLT.07.049908

10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.008

10.1097/01.mlr.0000244510.09001.e5

10.1016/j.amepre.2005.08.007

Hicken, V.N., 2004, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 107, 1053

Institute of Medicine., 2006, Rewarding provider performance: Aligning incentives in Medicare

Kaboli, P.J., 2004, American Journal of Managed Care, 10, 872

10.1097/MLR.0b013e318189375f

10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817d69c2

10.1197/jamia.M1498

10.1177/0272989X08315253

Pakhomov, S.V., 2008, American Journal of Managed Care, 14, 530

10.1097/MLR.0b013e31818dce21

10.1097/MLR.0b013e31818b070c

10.1001/archinte.166.20.2272

Powell, J., 2006, Informatics in Primary Care, 14, 55

Pringle, M., 1995, British Journal of General Practice, 45, 537

Ricciardi, T.N., AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings

10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31815fa5bb

10.1542/peds.2004-2741

10.1007/s11606-006-0256-z

10.1001/jama.282.12.1184

10.1197/jamia.M1813

10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.03.001

10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.10.004

10.1016/S1553-7250(08)34020-3

10.1197/jamia.M2198

10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.06.004

10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1070

10.1016/S1553-7250(07)33033-X

10.1016/S1553-7250(07)33090-0

10.1055/s-0038-1634243

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Medical Care Research and Review

Tập 67 Số 5

503-527

Thông tin tác giả