Responsible data sharing in international health research: a systematic review of principles and norms

BMC Medical Ethics - Tập 20 - Trang 1-13 - 2019
Shona Kalkman1, Menno Mostert1, Christoph Gerlinger2,3, Johannes J. M. van Delden1, Ghislaine J. M. W. van Thiel1
1Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
2Statistics and Data Insights, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany
3Clinic for Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany

Tóm tắt

Large-scale linkage of international clinical datasets could lead to unique insights into disease aetiology and facilitate treatment evaluation and drug development. Hereto, multi-stakeholder consortia are currently designing several disease-specific translational research platforms to enable international health data sharing. Despite the recent adoption of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the procedures for how to govern responsible data sharing in such projects are not at all spelled out yet. In search of a first, basic outline of an ethical governance framework, we set out to explore relevant ethical principles and norms. We performed a systematic review of literature and ethical guidelines for principles and norms pertaining to data sharing for international health research. We observed an abundance of principles and norms with considerable convergence at the aggregate level of four overarching themes: societal benefits and value; distribution of risks, benefits and burdens; respect for individuals and groups; and public trust and engagement. However, at the level of principles and norms we identified substantial variation in the phrasing and level of detail, the number and content of norms considered necessary to protect a principle, and the contextual approaches in which principles and norms are used. While providing some helpful leads for further work on a coherent governance framework for data sharing, the current collection of principles and norms prompts important questions about how to streamline terminology regarding de-identification and how to harmonise the identified principles and norms into a coherent governance framework that promotes data sharing while securing public trust.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Hemingway H, Asselbergs FW, Danesh J, Dobson R, Maniadakis N, Maggioni A, van Thiel GJM, Cronin M, Brobert G, Vardas P, Anker SD, Grobbee DE, Denaxas S. Innovative medicines initiative 2nd programme, big data for better outcomes, BigData@heart consortium of 20 academic and industry partners including ESC. Big data from electronic health records for early and late translational cardiovascular research: challenges and potential. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:1481–95.

BD4BO – Big Data for Better Outcomes. http://bd4bo.eu/. Accessed 22 Mar 2019.

Alfonso F. Data sharing: a new editorial initiative of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Netherlands Hear J. 2017;25:297–303.

EFPIA, PhRMA. Principles for responsible clinical trial data sharing: our commitment to patients and researchers. 2013.

Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH). Framework for Responsible Sharing of Genomic and Health-Related Data. 2014.

Funders of public health research. Joint statement of purpose—vision, principles, and goals. 2011.

Baker DB, Kaye J, Terry SF. Privacy, Fairness, and Respect for Individuals. eGEMs (Generating Evid Methods to Improv patient outcomes). 2016;4:7.

The Nuffield Council on Bioethics. The collection, linking and use of data in biomedical research and health care: ethical issues. 2015.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Recommendation of the Council on Human Biobanks and Genetic Research Databases. 2009.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Recommendation of the Council on Health Data Governance. 2017.

Regulatory and Ethics Working Group, Global Alliance for Genomics & Health R and EW, Sugano S, Sugano S. International code of conduct for genomic and health-related data sharing. Hugo J Springer. 2014;8:1.

World Medical Association (WMA). Declaration of Taipei on Ethical Considerations Regarding Health Databases and Biobanks. 2016.

Paltoo DN, Rodriguez LL, Feolo M, Gillanders E, Ramos EM, Rutter JL, Sherry S, Wang VO, Bailey A, Baker R, Caulder M, Harris EL, Langlais K, Leeds H, Luetkemeier E, Paine T, Roomian T, Tryka K, Patterson A, Green ED, National Institutes of Health Genomic Data Sharing Governance Committees. Data use under the NIH GWAS data sharing policy and future directions. Nat Genet. 2014;46:934–8.

Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH). Regulatory & Ethics Toolkit. https://www.ga4gh.org/genomic-data-toolkit/regulatory-ethics-toolkit/. Accessed 22 Mar 2019.

BBMRI-ERIC. A Code of Conduct for Health Research. http://code-of-conduct-for-health-research.eu/. Accessed 6 Aug 2018.

GSK. Data transparency | GSK. 2014. https://www.gsk.com/en-gb/research/our-approach/trials-in-people/data-transparency/. Accessed 22 Mar 2019.

European Medicines Agency (EMA). European Medicines Agency policy on publication of clinical data for medicinal products for human use. 2014.