Remarks on Groenendijk and Stokhof's theory of indirect questions

Bennett, Michael R. [SE]:Some Extensions of a Montague Fragment of English (Ph.D. thesis, UCLA 1974). Boër, Steven E. [WW]: ‘“Who” and “Whether”: Towards a Theory of Indirect Question Clauses’,Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (1978), 307–345. Carnap, Rudolf [RSE]: ‘Replies and Systematic Expositions’, in Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.),The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (La Salle/III. & London, 1963), pp. 859–1013. Cresswell, Maxwell J. [LL]:Logics and Languages (London, 1973). Gallin, Daniel [IML]:Intensional and Higher-Order Modal Logic (Amsterdam, 1975). Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof [SAW]: ‘Semantic Analysis ofwh-complements’,Linguistics and Philosophy 5 (1982), 175–233. Karttunen, Lauri [SSQ]: ‘Syntax and Semantics of Questions’,Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (1977), 3–44. Löbner, Sebastian [IVF]:Intensionale Verben und Funktionalbegriffe (Tübingen, 1979). Montague, Richard [PTO]: ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in Jaakko Himikka, Julius Moravcsik, and Partick Suppes (eds.),Approaches to Natural Language (Dordrecht 1973), pp. 221–242. Montague, Richard [UG]: ‘Universal Grammar’,Theoria 36 (1970), 373–398. Partee, Barbara H. [C]: ‘Compositionality’ (Draft), Nijmegen (Max-Planck-Institute of Psycholinguistics, 1983). Quine, Willard Van Orman [WO]:Word and Object (Cambridge/Mass, 1960). von Stechow, Arnim and Thomas Ede Zimmermann [TA]: ‘Term-Answers and Contextual Change’, to appear inLinguistics.