Public participation in decision making: A three-step procedure

Policy Sciences - Tập 26 Số 3 - Trang 189-214 - 1993
Ortwin Renn1, Thomas Webler2, Horst Rakel3, Peter C. Dienel4, Branden B. Johnson5
1Center of Technology Assessment, Stuttgart, Germany
2Project on Risk and Safety, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Herzogstr 7, CH-8044, Zürich, Switzerland
3Essen, Germany
4Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
5New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy, Division of Science and Research, Risk Communication Unit, Trenton, U.S.A.

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Almond, Gabriel A. and Sidney Verba (1961).The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Barber, Benjamin R. (1984).Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Bechmann Gotthard and Friedrich Gloede (1986). ?Sozialverträglichkeit ? eine neue Strategie der Verwissenschaftlichung von Politik?? in Helmut Jungermann, Wolfgang Pfaffenberger, Günther F. Schäfer, and Wolfgang Wild, eds.Die Analyse der Sozialverträglichkeit für Technologiepolitik ? Perspektiven und Interpretationen, HTV Edition ?Technik and Sozialer Wandel:? Munich, pp. 36?51.

Bongardt, Heinz, Peter Dienel, and Heiner Henning (1985).Bürger planen das Rathausviertel, Planungszellen erarbeiten Ausgangsdaten für den städtebaulichen Wettbewerb. Rathaus/Gürzenich Köln' Frankfurt/Main: Campus.

Bownes, Hugh H. (1990). ?Should trial by jury be eliminated in complex cases??Risk-Issues in Health and Safety 1 (1): 73?78.

Brooks, Harvey (1984). ?The resolution of technically intensive public policy disputes,?Science, Technology, and Human Values 9: 39?50.

Burns, Tom R. and Reinhard Ueberhorst (1988).Creative Democracy: Systematic Conflict Resolution and Policymaking in a World of High Science and Technology. New York: Praeger.

Chen Kan and J. C. Mathes (1989). ?Value oriented social decision analysis: A communication tool for public decision making on technological projects,? in Charles Vlek and George Cvetkovich, eds.Social Decision Methodology for Technological Projects. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 111?132.

Crosby, Ned, Janet M. Kelly, and Paul Schaefer (1986). ?Citizen panels: A new approach to citizen participation,?Public Administration Review 46: 170?178.

Crosby, Ned (1986).Implementing Citizen Panels: A Ten Year Program of Political Reform. Manuscript. Minneapolis: Center for New Democratic Processes.

Dahl, Ronald A. (1970).After the Revolution? Authority in a Good Society. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Dienel, Peter C. (1978).Die Planungszelle. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

Dienel, Peter C. (1980).New Options for Participatory Democracy. Werkstattpapier No. 1 of the University of Wuppertal. Wuppertal: University of Wuppertal.

Dienel, Peter C. (1986).Bürgergutachten: Regelung sozialer Folgen neuer Informationstechnologien. Leverkusen: IGEBP Verlag.

Dienel, Peter C. (1989). ?Contributing to social decision merthodology: Citizen reports on technological projects,? in: Charles Vlek and George Cvetkovich, eds..Social Decision Methodology for Technological Projects. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 133?151.

Dienel, Peter C. (1991).Bürgergutachten: ISDN. Wuppertal: Bergische Universität Wuppertal.

Dienel, Peter C. and Detlef Garbe (1985).Zukünftige Energiepolitik. Ein Bürgergutachten. Munich: HTV Edition ?Technik und Sozialer Wandel?.

Fiorino, Daniel J. (1989). ?Technical and democratic values in risk analysis,?Risk Analysis 9 (3): 293?299.

Fiorino, Daniel J. (1990). ?Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms,?Science, Technology, and Human Values 15 (2): 226?243.

Friedrich, Thomas and Detlef Garbe (1983).Bürgergutachten Energieversorgung Jüchen-Nord. Wuppertal: Bergische Universität Wuppertal.

Fritsch, Bruno (1986). Ambivalenzen im gesellschaftlichen Umgang mit technischem Fortschritt,? in Helmut Jungermann, Wolfgang Pfaffenberger, Günther F. Schäfer, and Wolfgang Wild, eds.,Die Analyse der Sozialverträglichkeit für Technologiepolitik ? Perspektiven und Interpretationen. Munich: HTV Edition ?Technik and Sozialer Wandel,? pp. 143?151.

Garbe, Detlef and Anja Grothe (1985).Bürgergutachten Testkriterien und Testplanung. Wuppertal: Bergische Universität Wuppertal.

Hammond, Kenneth R., Jeryl Mumpower, Robin L. Dennis, S. Fitch, and W. Crumpacker (1983). ?Fundamental obstacles to the use of scientific information in public policy making,?Technological Forecasting and Social Change 24: 287?293.

Humphreys, Patrick (1977), ?Application of multi-attribute utility theory,? in Helmut Jungermann and D. de Zeeuw, eds..Decision Making and Change in Human Affairs. Dordrecht: Reidelecht, pp. 165?205.

Jungermann, Helmut (1986), ?Die öffentliche Diskussion technologischer Mega-Themen: Eine Herausforderung für Experten und Bürger,? in Helmut Jungermann, Wolfgang Pfaffenberger, Günther F. Schäfer, and Wolfgang Wild, eds.Die Analyse der Sozialverträglichkeit für Technologiepolitik ? Perspektiven und Interpretationen. Munich: HTV Edition ?Technik und Sozialer Wandel,? pp. 92?101.

Jungermann, Helmut, Wolfgang Pfaffenberger, Günther F. Schäfer, and Wolfgang Wild, eds. (1986).Die Analyse der Sozialverträglichkeit für Technologiepolitik ? Perspektiven und Interpretationen. Munich: HTV Edition ?Technik und Sozialer Wandel.?

Kathlene, Lyn and John A. Martin (1991). ?Enhancing citizen participation: Panel designs, perspectives, and policy formation,?Policy Analysis and Management 10: 46?63.

Keeney, Ralph L. and Howard Raiffa (1976).Decisions with Multiple Objectives and Value Tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.

Keeney, Ralph L., Ortwin Renn, and Detlof von Winterfeldt (1987). ?Structuring West Germany's energy objectives,?Energy Policy 15 (4): 352?362.

Keeney, Ralph L., Ortwin Renn, Detlof von Winterfeldt and Ulrich Kotte (1984).Die Wertbaumanalyse, Entscheidungshilfe für die Politik. Munich: HTV Edition ?Technik und Sozialer Wandel.?

Kraft, Michael E. (1988). ?Evaluating technology through public participation: The nuclear waste disposal controversy,? in Michael E. Kraft and N. J. Vig, eds.Technology and Politics. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 253?277.

Michaelis, Hans (1986). ?Eingabedaten, Verfahrensaspekte und Schlussfolgerungen der KFA-Studien,? in Helmut Jungermann, Wolfgang Pfaffenberger, Günther F. Schäfer, and Wolfgang Wild, eds.Die Analyse der Sozialverträglichkeit für Technologiepolitik ? Perspektiven und Interpretationen. Munich: HTV Edition ?Technik und Sozialer Wandel,? pp. 60?74.

Nelkin, Dorothy and Michael Pollak (1979). ?Public participation in technology decisions,?Technology Review 81: 55?64.

Olson, Mancur E. (1982).Participatory Pluralism. Chicago: Nelson Hall.

Pollak, Michael (1985). ?Public participation,? in Harry Otway and Malcolm Peltu, eds.Regulating Industrial Risk. London: Butterworths, pp. 76?94.

Quade, E. S. (1975).Analysis for Public Decisions. New York: Elsevier.

Raiffa, Howard (1970).Decision Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

Rayner, Steven and Robyn Cantor (1987). ?How fair is safe enough? The cultural approach to societal technology choice,?Risk Analysis 7: 3?10.

Renn, Ortwin (1991). ?Premises of risk communication: Results of two participatory experiments,? in Roger E. Kasperson and Peter J. Stallen, eds.Communicating Risks to the Public: International Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 457?481.

Renn, Ortwin (1986). ?Decision analytic tools for resolving uncertainty in the energy debate,?Nuclear Engineering and Design 93 (2?3): 167?180.

Renn, Ortwin, Rob Goble, Debra Levine, Horst Rakel, and Thomas Webler (1989).Citizen Participation for Sludge Management. Final Report to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Worcester, MA: CENTED, Clark University.

Renn, Ortwin, Gabriele Albrecht, Ulrich Kotte, Hans Peter Peters, and Hans Ulrich Stegelmann (1985).Sozialverträgliche Energiepolitik. Ein Gutachten für die Bundesregierung. Munich: HTV Edition ?Technik und Sozialer Wandel.?

Renn, Ortwin, Hans Ulrich Stegelmann, Gabriele Albrecht, Ulrich Kotte, and Hans Peter Peters (1984). ?An empirical investigation of citizens' preferences among four energy scenarios,?Technological Forecasting and Social Change 26 (1): 11?46.

Renn, Ortwin and Ulrich Kotte (1984). ?Umfassende Bewertung der vier Pfade der Enquete-Kommission auf der Basis eines Indikatorkatalogs,? in Gabriele Albrecht and Hans Ulrich Stegelmann, eds.Energie im Brennpunkt. Munich: HTV Edition ?Technik und Sozialer Wandel,? pp. 190?232.

Rosener, Judy R. (1978). ?Matching method to purpose: The challenges of planning citizen participation activities,? in Stuart Langton, ed.Citizen Participation in America. Lexington: Lexington Books.

Schäfer, Günther F. (1986). ?Die Planungszelle als Sozialwissenschaftliches Messinstrument,? in Helmut Jungermann, Wolfgang Pfaffenberger, Günther F. Schäfer, and Wolfgang Wild, eds.Die Analyse der Sozialverträglichkeit für Technologiepolitik ? Perspektiven und Interpretationen. Munich: HTV Edition ?Technik und Sozialer Wandel,? pp. 75?79.

Schoemaker, Peter J. (1982). ?The expected utility model: Its variants, purposes, evidence, and limitations,?Journal of Economic Literature 30: 529?563.

Schrader-Frechette, Kristin (1985).Risk Analysis and Scientific Method: Methodological and Ethical Issues with Evaluating Societal Risks. Amsterdam and New York: Reidel.

Seo, Fumiko and Masatoshi Sakawa (1988).Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in Regional Planning: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Slovic, Paul, Baruch Fischhoff, and Sarah Lichtenstein (1982). ?Why study risk perception?Risk Analysis 2 (2): 83?92.

Stern, Paul C. (1991). ?Learning through conflict: A realistic strategy for risk communication,?Policy Sciences 24: 99?119.

Stewart, Thomas R., Robin L. Dennis, and Daniel W. Ely (1984). ?Citizen participation and judgment in policy analysis: A case study of urban air quality policy,?Policy Sciences 17: 67?87.

Susskind, Lawrence, Lawrence Bacow, and Michael Wheeler (1983).Resolving Environmental Regulatory Disputes. Cambridge: Schenkman.

von Alemann, Ulrich (1986). ?Partizapation oder Akzeptanz. Bemerkungen zur Verträglichkeit von Demokratie und Technologie,? in Helmut Jungermann, Wolfgang Pfaffenberger, Günther F. Schäfer, and Wolfgang Wild, eds.Die Analyse der Sozialverträglichkeit für Technologiepolitik ? Perspektiven und Interpretationen. Munich: HTV Edition ?Technik und Sozialer Wandel,? pp. 28?35.

von Winterfeldt, Detlof (1987). ?Value tree analysis: An introduction and an application to offshore oil driling,? in P. R. Kleindorfer and Howard C. Kunreuther, eds.Insuring and Managing Hazardous Risks: From Seveso to Bhopal and Beyond. Berlin: Springer, pp. 439?377.

von Winterfeldt, Detlof and Edwards, Ward (1984). ?Patterns of conflict about risky technologies,?Risk Analysis 4 (1): 55?67.

von Winterfeldt, Detlof and Edwards, Ward (1986).Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Watson, S. R. (1982). ?Multiattribute utility theory for measuring safety,?European Journal of Operational Research 10: 77?81.

Webler, Thomas, Debra Levine, Horst Rakel, and Ortwin Renn (1991). ?The group delphi: A novel attempt at reducing uncertainty,?Technological Forecasting and Social Change 39: 253?263.

Wiswede, Günter (1986). ?Über die angemessene und unanemessene Art, Komplexität zu reduzieren,? in Helmut Jungermann, Wolfgang Pfaffenberger, Günther F. Schäfer, and Wolfgang Wild, eds.Die Analyse der Sozialverträglichkeit für Technologiepolitik ? Perspektiven und Interpretationen. Munich: HTV Edition ?Technik und Sozialer Wandel,? pp. 128?134.