Prostate Health Index (PHI) improves prostate cancer detection at initial biopsy in Taiwanese men with PSA 4–10 ng/mL

The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences - Tập 34 - Trang 461-466 - 2018
Po-Fan Hsieh1, Chao-Hsiang Chang1,2, Chi-Rei Yang1, Chi-Ping Huang1, Wen-Chi Chen1,2, Chin-Chung Yeh1,2, Eric Chieh-Lung Chou1,2, Kuo-Liang Chen1,2, Chi-Shun Lien1, Guang-Heng Chen1, Po-Jen Hsiao1, Yi-Huei Chang1, Hsi-Chin Wu1,2
1Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
2School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taiwan

Tóm tắt

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to validate the Prostate Health Index (PHI) for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa). We prospectively enrolled patients aged 50–75 years with a serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level of 4–10 ng/mL undergoing transrectal biopsy of the prostate between April 2016 and May 2017. The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance of various PSA derivatives (total PSA, free PSA, %fPSA, p2PSA, %p2PSA, and PHI) to predict PCa. The secondary outcome was comparisons of PSA derivatives between patients with a Gleason score (GS) 6 and GS 7. PCa was diagnosed in 36 of 154 (23.4%) patients, and 26 (16.9%) had a GS 7. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were significantly greater in %p 2PSA and PHI than in PSA (0.76 vs. 0.57, p = 0.015 and 0.77 vs. 0.57, p = 0.004, respectively). Patients with a GS 7PCa had marginally higher %p2PSA and PHI than those with a GS of 6 (17.8 vs. 12.73, p = 0.06; 46.58 vs. 31.55, p = 0.05). At a PHI cutoff value of 29.6, the sensitivity and specificity were 77.8% and 67.8% in detecting PCa, respectively. In addition, 57.1% of the patients avoided an unnecessary biopsy, while three patients (1.9%) with GS 7 PCa were missed. In conclusion, the ability of %p2PSA and PHI to predict prostate biopsy outcome was better than that of PSA and %fPSA in the initial biopsy in Taiwanese men with serum PSA between 4 and 10 ng/mL.


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.3322/caac.21387

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000101)85:1<60::AID-IJC11>3.0.CO;2-B

10.1002/cncr.22872

Available at External linkhttps://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/List.aspx?nodeid=1415[Accessed 30 Mar 2018].

NCCN guideline Asia consensus statement prostate cancer version 2.2013 Available at: External linkhttp://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/prostate‐asia.pdf

10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.039

10.1056/NEJM198710083171501

10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.004

10.1056/NEJMoa1201637

10.1056/NEJMoa0810084

10.1056/NEJMoa0810696

10.1097/MOU.0000000000000382

10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11329.x

10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0007

10.1038/pcan.2013.50

10.4103/1008-682X.168687

10.1007/s11255-016-1350-8

10.1002/pros.23382

10.1097/01.pas.0000173646.99337.b1

10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2010.04.062

Filella X., 2013, Evaluation of [−2] proPSA and Prostate Health Index (phi) for the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis, Clin Chem Lab Med, 51, 729, 10.1515/cclm-2012-0410

10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003

10.1371/journal.pone.0067687

10.1038/pcan.2016.72

10.1038/pcan.2009.54

10.1111/bju.12879