Productivity Measurement of Hi-tech Industry of China Malmquist Productivity Index – DEA Approach

Abramovitz, 1956, Resources and output trends in the U. S. since 1870, American Economic Review, 46, 5

Boussofiane, 1991, Applied data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 52, 1, 10.1016/0377-2217(91)90331-O

Caves, 1982, The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity, Econometrica, 50, 1393, 10.2307/1913388

Chen, 2006, Evaluating the development of hi-tech industries:Taiwan's science park(J), Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 452, 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.04.003

Coelli, 1998

Cummins, 1999, Analyzing firm performance in the insurance industry using frontier efficiency and productivity methods

Fare, 1992, Malm quist indexes and Fisher ideal indexes, The Economic Journal, 102, 158, 10.2307/2234861

Fare, 1995, Productivity and quality changes in Swedish pharmacies, International Journal of Production Economics, 39, 137, 10.1016/0925-5273(94)00063-G

Fare, 1994, Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries, American Economic Review, 84, 66

Giuffrida, 1999, Productivity and efficiency changes in primary care: A Malm quist index approach, Health Care Management Science, 2, 11, 10.1023/A:1019067223945

Co, 1997, Performance and R&D expenditures in American and Japanese manufacturing firms(J), International Journal of Production Research, 35, 3333, 10.1080/002075497194101

Malmquist, 1953, Index numbers and in difference surfaces, Trabajos de Estadistica, 4, 209, 10.1007/BF03006863

Sharma, 2008, Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis:An application of data envelopment analysis(J), Scientometrics, 76, 483, 10.1007/s11192-007-1896-4