Preferences in artificial intelligence

Åqvist, L.: Deontic logic. In: Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, pp. 147–264. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1984)

Adams, E.: The Logic of Conditionals. Reidel, Dordrecht (1975)

Alchourrón, C.: Philosophical foundations of deontic logic and the logic of defeasible conditionals. In: Meyer, J.J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) Deontic Logic in Computer Science: Normative System Specification, pp. 43–84. Wiley, New York (1993)

Aleskerov, F., Bouyssou, D., Monjardet, B.: Utility Maximization, Choice and Preference, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2007)

Alsina, C.: On a family of connectives for fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 16, 231–235 (1985)

Amgoud, L.: A formal framework for handling conflicting desires. In: Proceedings of ECSQARU’03, vol. 2711, pp. 552–563 (2003)

Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: Integrating preference orderings into argument-based reasoning, pp. 159–170 (1997)

Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation framework. In: Proceedings of UAI’98, pp. 1–7 (1998)

Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 34, 197–216 (2002)

Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C., LeBerre, D.: Comparing arguments using preference orderings for argument-based reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pp. 400–403 (1996)

Amgoud, L., Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P.: A unified and general framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In: Proceedings of AAMAS’07, pp. 158:1–158:8 (2007)

Amgoud, L., Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P.: Making decisions through preference- based argumentation. In: Proceedings of KR‘08, pp. 113–123 (2008)

Amgoud, L., Maudet, N., Parsons, S.: Modeling dialogues using argumentation. In: Proceedingd of ICMAS’00, pp. 31–38 (2000)

Amgoud, L., Prade, H.: Using arguments for making and explaining decisions. Artif. Intell. 173, 413–436 (2009)

Amgoud, L., Vesic, S.: Generalizing stable semantics by preferences. In: COMMA, pp. 39–50 (2010)

Amgoud, L., Vesic, S.: A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 63, 149–183 (2011)

Arieli, O., Avron, A.: The value of the four values. Artif. Intell. 102, 97–141 (1998)

Arieli, O., Avron, A., Zamansky, A.: Ideal paraconsistent logics. Stud. Logica. 99, 31–60 (2011)

Arieli, O., Cornelis, C., Deschrijver, G.: Preference modeling by rectangular bilattices. In: Proceedings of MDAI 2006, LNAI 3885, pp. 22–33. Springer, Berlin (2006)

Arrow, K.: Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1963)

Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., McBurney, P.: Persuasive political argument. In: Computational Models of Natural Argument, IJCAI’05 workshop, pp. 44–51 (2005)

Baader, F., Hollunder, B.: Priorities on defaults with prerequisites, and their application in treating specificity in terminological default logic. J. Autom. Reason. 15(1), 41–68 (1995)

Bacchus, F., Grove, A.: Graphical models for preference and utility. In: Proceedings of UAI’95, pp. 3–10 (1995)

Baier, J.A., McIlraith, S.A.: Planning with Preferences. AI Mag. 29(4), 25–36 (2008)

Barberà, S., Bossert, W., Pattanaik, P.K.: Ranking sets of objects. In: Barberà, S., Hammond, P., Seidl, C. (eds.) Handbook of Utility Theory, Vol 2: Extensions, pp. 893–977. Springer, Berlin (2004)

Belnap, N.: How a computer should think. In: Proceedings of the Oxford International Symposium on Contemporary Aspects of Philosophy, pp. 30–56, Oxford (1976)

Belnap, N.: A useful four-valued logic. In: Epstein, G., Dunn, J. (eds.) Modern Uses of Multiple Valued Logics, pp. 8–37. Reidel, Dordrecht (1977)

Belton, V., Gear, T.: On a short-coming of saaty’s method of analytic hierarchies. Omega 11(3), 228–230 (1983)

Benabbou, N., Perny, P., Viappiani, P.: Incremental elicitation of choquet capacities for multicriteria decision making. In: ECAI 2014 - 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 18–22 August 2014, Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 87–92 (2014)

Bench-Capon, T., Dunne, P.: Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artif. Intell. 171, 619–641 (2007)

Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J. Log. Comput. 13, 429–448 (2003)

Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases. In: Proceedings of UAI’93, pp. 411–419 (1993)

Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Towards a possibilistic logic handling of preferences. Appl. Intell. 14, 303–317 (2001)

Benthem, J., Grossi, D., Liu, F.: Deontics = betterness + priority. In: Governatori, G., Sartor, G. (eds.) Deontic Logic in Computer Science, LNCS, vol. 6181, pp. 50–65. Springer, Berlin (2010)

Bergstra, J., Bethke, I., Rodenburg, P.: A propositional logic with four values: true, false, divergent and meaningless. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 5, 199–217 (1995)

Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: Elements of Argumentation. MIT Press (2008)

Bienvenu, M., Lang, J., Wilson, N.: From preference logics to preference languages, and back. In: Proceedings of KR 10, pp. 214–224 (2010)

Bigot, D., Zanuttini, B., Fargier, H., Mengin, J.: Probabilistic conditional preference networks. CoRR arXiv: 1309.6817 (2013)

Bistarelli, S., Pini, M., Rossi, F., Venable, K.: From soft constraints to bipolar preferences: modelling framework and solving issues. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 22, 135–158 (2010)

Bistarelli, S., Pini, M., Rossi, F., Venable, K.: Uncertainty in bipolar preference problems. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 23, 545–575 (2011)

Boella, G., van der Torre, L., Verhagen, H.: Introduction to normative multiagent systems. Computation and Mathematical Organizational Theory, Special issue on Normative Multiagent Systems 12(2–3), 71–79 (2006)

Bondarenko, A., Dung, P., Kowalski, R., Toni, F.: An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artif. Intell. 93, 63–101 (1997)

Bondarenko, A., Toni, F., Kowalski, R.: An assumption-based framework for non-monotonic reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, pp. 171–189 (1993)

Booth, R., Chevaleyre, Y., Lang, J., Mengin, J., Sombattheera, C.: Learning conditionally lexicographic preference relations. In: Proceedings of ECAI’10, pp. 269–274 (2010)

Bossu, G., Siegel, P.: Saturation, nonmonotonic reasoning and the closed-world assumption. Artif. Intell. 25, 13–65 (1985)

Boutilier, C.: What is a default priority. In: Proceedings of Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence Conference, pp. 140–147 (1992)

Boutilier, C.: A POMDP formulation of preference elicitation problems. In: Proceedings of AAAI’02, pp. 239–246 (2002)

Boutilier, C., Bacchus, F., Brafman, R.: UCP-networks: a directed graphical representation of conditional utilities. In: Proceedings of UAI’01, pp. 56–64 (2001)

Boutilier, C., Brafman, R., Hoos, H., Poole, D.: Reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. In: Proceedings of UAI’99, pp. 71–80 (1999)

Boutilier, C., Patrascu, R., Poupart, P., Schuurmans, D.: Constraint-based optimization and utility elicitation using the minimax decision criterion. Artif. Intell. 170, 686–713 (2006)

Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T., Pirlot, M., Perny, P., Tsoukiàs, A., Vincke, P.: Evaluation and Decision Models: a Critical Perspective. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000)

Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T., Pirlot, M., Tsoukiàs, A., Vincke, P.: Evaluation and Decision Models with Multiple Criteria: Stepping Stones for the Analyst. Springer, Boston (2006)

Bouyssou, D., Pirlot, M.: Preferences for multiattributed alternatives: traces, dominance, and numerical representations. J. Math. Psychol. 48, 167–185 (2004)

Bouyssou, D., Pirlot, M.: Conjoint measurement tools for MCDM. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 73–132. Springer, Boston (2005)

Bouyssou, D., Pirlot, M.: Following the traces: - an introduction to conjoint measurement without transitivity and additivity. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 163, 287–337 (2005)

Bouyssou, D., Pirlot, M.: Conjoint measurement models for preference relations. In: Bouyssou, D., Dubois, D., Pirlot, M., Prade, H. (eds.) Decision Making Process, pp. 617–672. Wiley, New York (2009)

Brafman, R., Dimopoulos, Y.: Extended semantics and optimization algorithms for CP-networks. Comput. Intell. 20, 219–245 (2004)

Brafman, R., Domshlak, C.: Introducing variable importance tradeoffs into CP-Nets. In: Proceedings of UAI’02, pp. 69–76 (2002)

Brafman, R., Domshlak, C.: Graphically structured value-function compilation. Artif. Intell. 172, 325–349 (2008)

Brafman, R., Domshlak, C.: Preference handling: an introductory tutorial. AI Mag. 30, 58–86 (2008)

Brafman, R., Roberts, F., Tsoukiàs, A.: Proceedings of ADT 2011. LNAI 6992. Springer, Berlin (2011)

Braunhofer, M., Kaminskas, M., Ricci, F.: Location-aware music recommendation. IJMIR 2(1), 31–44 (2013)

Brewka, G.: Preferred subtheories: An extended logical framework for default reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2, IJCAI’89, pp. 1043–1048. Morgan Kaufmann (1989)

Brewka, G.: Adding priorities and specificity to default logic. In: MacNish, C., Pearce, D., Pereira, L.M. (eds.) Logics in Artificial Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 838, pp. 247–260. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (1994)

Brewka, G.: Reasoning about priorities in default logic. In: Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 940–945. MIT Press (1994)

Brewka, G.: A rank-based description language for qualitative preferences. In: Proceedings of ECAI 04, p. 303307 (2004)

Brewka, G., Niemel, I., Truszczynski, M.: Answer set optimization. In: Proceedings of IJCAI’03, pp. 867–872 (2003)

Brewka, G., Niemela, I., Truszczynski, M.: Preferences and nonmonotonic reasoning. AI Mag. 29, 69–78 (2008)

Brinker, K., Hüllermeier, E.: Case-based label ranking. In: Fürnkranz, J., Scheffer, T., Spiliopoulou, M. (eds.) ECML, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4212, pp. 566–573. Springer (2006)

Britz, K., Heidema, J., Meyer, T.A.: Semantic preferential subsumption. In: Proceedings of KR’08, pp. 476–484 (2008)

Britz, K., Meyer, T., Varzinczak, I.: Preferential reasoning for modal logics. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 278, 55–69 (2011)

Caminada, M., Amgoud, L.: On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms. Artif. Intell. 171, 286–310 (2007)

Casini, G., Straccia, U.: Rational closure for defeasible description logics. In: Proceedings of JELIA’10, pp. 77–90 (2010)

Castañeda, H.: The paradoxes of deontic logic: the simplest solution to all of them in one fell swoop. In: Hilpinen, R. (ed.) New Studies in Deontic Logic: Norms, Actions and the Foundations of Ethics, pp. 37–85. Reidel, Doredrecht (1981)

Cayrol, C., Royer, V., Saurel, C.: Management of preferences in assumption-based reasoning. In: Proceedings of IPMU’92, pp. 13–22 (1993)

Chajewska, U., Koller, D., Parr, R.: Making rational decisions using adaptive utility elicitation. In: Proceedings of AAAI’00, pp. 363–369 (2000)

Chellas, B.: Conditional obligation. In: Stunland, S. (ed.) Logical Theory and Semantical Analysis, pp. 23–33. Reidel, Dordrecht (1974)

Chevaleyre, Y., Endriss, U., Lang, J.: Expressive power of weighted propositional formulas for cardinal preference modeling. In: Proceedings of KR’06, pp. 145–152 (2006)

Chevaleyre, Y., Endriss, U., Lang, J., Maudet, N.: Preference handling in combinatorial domains: from AI to social choice. AI Mag. 29(4), 37–46 (2008). http://www.aaai.org/ojs/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/2201

Chevaleyre, Y., Koriche, F., Lang, J., Mengin, J., Zanuttini, B.: Learning ordinal preferences on multiattribute domains: the case of cp-nets. In: Fürnkranz, J., Hüllermeier, E. (eds.) Preference Learning, pp. 273–296. Springer, Berlin (2011)

Chisholm, R.: Perceiving. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1957)

Chisholm, R.: Theory of Knowledge. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1966)

Colorni, A., Tsoukiàs, A.: What is a decision problem? preliminary statements. In: Proceedings of ADT’13, LNAI 8176, pp. 139–153. Springer, Berlin (2013)

Bana e Costa, C.A., Vansnick, J.C.: MACBETH - an interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value functions. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 1, 489–500 (1994)

Bana e Costa, C.A., Vansnick, J.C.: A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 187, 1422–1428 (2008)

Critchlow, D.E., Fligner, M.A., Verducci, J.S.: Probability models on rankings. J. Math. Psychol. 35, 294–318 (1991)

Danielsson, S.: Preference and obligation. Studies in the logic of ethics. Filosofiska föreningen, Uppsala (1968)

de Finetti, B.: La prévision : ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. In: Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré, vol. 7, pp. 1–68. Paris (1937). Translated into English by Henry E. Kyburg Jr., Foresight: Its Logical Laws, its Subjective Sources. In Henry E. Kyburg Jr. and Howard E. Smokler (1964, Eds.), Studies in Subjective Probability, 53–118, Wiley, New York

Delgrande, J.P., Schaub, T.: Expressing preferences in default logic. Artif. Intell. 123(1–2), 41–87 (2000)

Delgrande, J.P., Schaub, T.H.: Compiling reasoning with and about preferences into default logic. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence - Volume 1, IJCAI’97, pp. 168–174. Morgan Kaufmann (1997)

Deschrijver, G., Arieli, O., Cornelis, C., Kerre, E.: A bilattice-based framework for handling graded truth and imprecision. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowledge Based Syst. 15, 13–41 (2007)

Doherty, P., Driankov, D., Tsoukiàs, A.: Partial logics and partial preferences. In: Proceedings of CEMIT’92, pp. 525–528 (1992)

Domshlak, C., Brafman, R.: CP-nets - reasoning and consistency testing. In: Proceedings of KR’02, pp. 121–132 (2002)

Domshlak, C., Hüllermeier, E., Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Preferences in AI: an overview. Artif. Intell. 175, 1037–1052 (2011)

Doyle, J.: Prospects for preferences. Comput. Intell. 20, 111–136 (2004)

Doyle, J., Wellman, M.: Impediments to universal preference-based default theories. Artif. Intell. 49, 97–128 (1991)

Dubarle, D.: Essai sur la généralisation naturelle de la logique usuelle. Mathématique, Informatique, Sciences Humaines N ∘ 107, 17–73 (1989). 1963 manuscript, published posthumously

Dubois, D., Fargier, H., Perny, P.: Qualitative decision theory with preference relations and comparative uncertainty: an axiomatic approach. Artif. Intell. 148, 219–260 (2003)

Dubois, D., Fargier, H., Perny, P., Prade, H.: Qualitative decision theory: from Savage’s axioms to non-monotonic reasoning. J. ACM 49, 455–495 (2002)

Dubois, D., Grabisch, M., Modave, F., Prade, H.: Relating decision under uncertainty and multicriteria decision making models. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 15, 967–979 (2000)

Dubois, D., Prade, H.: A class of fuzzy measures based on triangular norms. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 8, 43–61 (1982)

Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility Theory. Plenum Press, New-York (1988)

Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility theory as a basis for qualitative decision theory. In: Proceedings of IJCAI’95, pp. 1924–1930 (1995)

Dubois, D., Prade, H.: An introduction to bipolar representations of information and preference. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23, 866–877 (2008)

Dubus, J., Gonzales, C., Perny, P.: Multiobjective optimization using GAI models. In: Proceedings of IJCAI’09, pp. 1902–1907 (2009)

Dung, P.: An argumentation semantics for logic programming with explicit negation. In: Proceedings of the 10th Logic Programming Conference, pp. 616–630 (1993)

Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77, 321–357 (1995)

Dupinde Saint-Cyr, F., Lang, J., Schiex, T.: Penalty logic and its link with DempsterShafer theory. In: Proceedings of UAI’94, pp. 204–211 (1994)

Dyer, J.S.: A clarification of ”remarks on the analytic hierarchy process”. Manag. Sci. 36(3), 274–275 (1990). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2631949

Dyer, J.S.: Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Manag. Sci. 36(3), 249–258 (1990). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2631946

Ehrgott, M.: Multiobjective optimization. AI Mag. 29(4), 47–57 (2008). http://www.aaai.org/ojs/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/2198

Etherington, D.: Reasoning with Incomplete Information. Pitman, London (1988)

Fages, F., Ruet, P.: Combining explicit negation and negation by failure via belnap’s logic. Theor. Comput. Sci. 171, 61–75 (1997)

Fargier, H., Sabadin, R.: Qualitative decision under uncertainty: back to expected utility. Artif. Intell. 164, 245–280 (2005)

Fishburn, P.: Utility Theory for Decision Making. Wiley, New York (1970)

Fishburn, P.: Lexicographic orders, utilities and decision rules: a survey. Manag. Sci. 20, 1442–1471 (1974)

Fishburn, P.: Interval Orders and Interval Graphs. Wiley, New York (1985)

Fishburn, P.: Nonlinear Preference and Utility Theory. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1988)

Fishburn, P.: Preference structures and their numerical representations. Theor. Comput. Sci. 217, 359–383 (1999)

Fitting, M.: Bilattices and the semantics of logic programming. J. Log. Program. 11, 91–116 (1991)

Fodor, J., Roubens, M.: Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1994)

Føllesdal, D., Hilpinen, R.: Deontic logic: an introduction. In: Hilpinen, R. (ed.) Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings. Reidel, Dordrecht (1971)

Font, J., Moussavi, M.: Note on a six valued extension of three valued logics. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 3, 173–187 (1993)

Forrester, J.W.: Gentle murder, or the adverbial samaritan. J. Philos. 81, 193–196 (1984)

Fortemps, P., Słowiński, R.: A graded quadrivalent logic for ordinal preference modelling: loyola-like approach. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Making 1, 93–111 (2002)

Fürnkranz, J., Hüllermeier, E., Cheng, W., Park, S.H.: Preference-based reinforcement learning: a formal framework and a policy iteration algorithm. Mach. Learn. 89, 123–156 (2012)

Gabbay, D.: Theoretical foundations for nonmonotonic reasoning in expert systems. In: Proceedings Nato Advanced Study Institute on Logic and Models of Concurrent Systems, pp. 439–457. Springer, Berlin (1985)

Gajos, K., Weld, D.S.: Preference elicitation for interface optimization. In: Proceedings of UIST’05, pp. 173–182 (2005)

García, A., Simari, G.: Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach. Theory Pract. Logic Program. 4, 95–138 (2004)

Gedikli, F., Jannach, D., Ge, M.: How should I explain? A comparison of different explanation types for recommender systems. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 72 (4), 367–382 (2014)

Geffner, H., Pearl, J.: Conditional entailment: bridging two approaches to default reasoning. Artif. Intell. 53(2–3), 209–244 (1992)

Gelain, M., Pini, M., Rossi, F., Venable, K., Wilson, N.: Interval-valued soft constraint problems. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 58, 261–298 (2010)

Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Logic programs with classical negation. In: Warren, D.H. (ed.) Logic Programming, pp. 579–597. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. N. Gener. Comput. 9, 365–385 (1991)

Gelfond, M., Przymusinska, H., Przymusinski, T.: On the relationship between circumscription and negation as failure. AIJ 38, 75–94 (1989)

Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D., Wakker, P.: Utility in case-based decision theory. J. Econ. Theory 105, 483–502 (2002)

Ginsberg, M.: Multivalued logics: a uniform approach to reasoning in artificial intelligence. Comput. Intell. 4, 265–316 (1988)

Giordano, L., Olivetti, N., Gliozzi, V., Pozzato, G.L.: Alc + t: a preferential extension of description logics. Fundamenta Informaticae 96, 341–372 (2009)

Goble, L.: A logic of good, would and should. part 1. J. Philos. Log. 19, 169–199 (1990)

Goble, L.: A logic of good, would and should. part 2. J. Philos. Log. 19, 253–276 (1990)

Gonzales, C., Perny, P.: GAI networks for utility elicitation. In: Proceedings KR’04, pp. 224–234 (2004)

Gonzales, C., Perny, P., Queiroz, S.: Preference aggregation with graphical utility models. In: Proceedings of AAAI’08, pp. 1037–1042 (2008)

Gordon, T.: The pleading game An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1995)

Governatori, G., Maher, M., Antoniou, G., Billington, D.: Argumentation semantics for defeasible logic. J. Log. Comput. 14(5), 675–702 (2004)

Grabisch, M.: Fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 69, 279–298 (1995)

Grabisch, M., Labreuche, C.: Fuzzy measures and integrals in MCDA. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 563–608. Springer, Boston (2005)

Greco, S., Mousseau, V., Slowinski, R.: Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 191, 416–436 (2008)

Greco, S., Mousseau, V., Slowinski, R.: Multiple criteria sorting with a set of additive value functions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207, 1455–1470 (2010)

Guo, S., Sanner, S.: Real-time multiattribute bayesian preference elicitation with pairwise comparison queries. In: AISTATS, pp. 289–296 (2010)

Halpern, J., Moses, Y.: Towards a theory of knowledge and ignorance: preliminary report. In: Proceedings of NMR’84, pp. 125–143 (1984)

Hansson, B.: An analysis of some deontic logics. Noûs 3, 373–398 (1969)

Hansson, S.: Preference-Based Deontic Logic (PDL). J. Philos. Log. 19, 75–93 (1990)

Harker, P.T., Vargas, L.G.: Reply to ”remarks on the analytic hierarchy process” by j. s. dyer. Manag. Sci. 36(3), 269–273 (1990). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2631948

Herbrich, R., Minka, T., Graepel, T.: Trueskilltm: a bayesian skill rating system. In: Proceedings of NIPS’06, pp. 569–576 (2006)

Israel, D.: What’s wrong with non-monotonic logic?. In: Proceedings of AAAI’80, pp. 99–101 (1980)

Israel, D.: The role(s) of logic in artificial intelligence. In: Gabbay, D.M., Hogger, C.J., Robinson, J.A. (eds.) Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, vol. I, pp. 1–31. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1993)

Jackson, F.: On the semantics and logic of obligation. Mind 94, 177–196 (1985)

Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Siskos, Y.: Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: the UTA method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 10, 151–164 (1982)

Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Siskos, Y.: Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 130, 233–245 (2001)

Joachims, T.: Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In: Proceedings of KDD’02, pp. 133–142 (2002)

Jones, A., Sergot, M.: Deontic logic in the representation of law: towards a methodology. Artif. Intell. Law 1, 45–64 (1992)

Jones, A., Sergot, M.: On the characterisation of law and computer systems: the normative systems perspective. In: Meyer, J.J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) Deontic Logic in Computer Science. Wiley (1993)

Jørgensen, J.: Imperatives and logic. Erkenntnis 7, 288–296 (1938)

Kaci, S.: Refined preference-based argumentation frameworks. In: COMMA, pp. 299–310 (2010)

Kaci, S.: Working with preferences: Less is More. Springer, Berlin (2011)

Kaci, S., van der Torre, L.: Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values. J. Approx. Reason. 48(3), 730–751 (2008)

Kaci, S., van der Torre, L.W.N., Weydert, E.: Acyclic argumentation: attack = conflict + preference. In: Proceedings of ECAI’06, pp. 725–726 (2006)

Kaci, S., van der Torre, L.: Reasoning with various kinds of preferences: logic, non-monotonicity, and algorithms. Ann. Oper. Res. 163, 89114 (2008)

Kacprzyk, J., Roubens, M.: Non Conventional Preference Relations in Decision Making. Springer Verlag, LNMES n. 301, Berlin (1988)

Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263–291 (1979)

Kakas, A., Moraitis, P.: Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents. In: Proceedings of AAMAS’03, pp. 883–890 (2003)

Kaluzhny, Y., Muravitsky, A.: A knowledge representation based on the Belnap’s four valued logic. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 3, 189–203 (1993)

Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley, New York (1976)

Köbberling, V., Wakker, P.: Preference foundations for nonexpected utility: a generalized and simplified technique. Math. Oper. Res. 28, 395–423 (2003)

Kok, E.M., Meyer, J.J.C., Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.: A formal argumentation framework for deliberation dialogues. In: Proceedings of ArgMAS’10, pp. 31–48 (2010)

Koons, R.: Defeasible reasoning. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, on-line. Stanford University, Stanford (2009)

Kouvelis, P., Yu, G.: Robust Discrete Optimization and Its Applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)

Krantz, D., Luce, R., Suppes, P., Tversky, A.: Foundations of Measurement, vol. 1: Additive and Polynomial Representations. Academic Press, New York (1971)

Kraus, S., Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artif. Intell. 44, 167–207 (1990)

Kraus, S., Sycara, K., Evenchik, A.: Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Artif. Intell. 104, 1–69 (1998)

Labreuche, C., Huédé, F.L.: MYRIAD: a tool suite for MCDA. In: Proceedings of EUSFLAT’05, pp. 204–209 (2005)

Lafage, C., Lang, J.: Propositional distances and compact preference representation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 160, 741–761 (2005)

Lang, J.: Logical preference representation and combinatorial vote. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 42, 3771 (2004)

Lang, J.: Logical representation of preferences. In: Bouyssou, D., Dubois, D., Pirlot, M., Prade, H. (eds.) Decision-Making Process: Concepts and Methods, pp. 321–363. Wiley, New York (2009)

Lang, J., Mengin, J., Xia, L.: Aggregating conditionally lexicographic preferences on multi-issue domains. In: Proceedings of CP 2012, pp. 973–987 (2012)

Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: Preferential logics: the predicate calculus case. In: Proceedings of TARK’90, pp. 57–72 (1990)

Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: What does a conditional knowledge base entail? Artif. Intell. 55, 1–60 (1992)

Lewis, D.: Semantic analysis for dyadic deontic logic. In: Stunland, S. (ed.) Logical Theory and Semantical Analysis, pp. 1–14. Reidel, Dordrecht (1974)

Lifschitz, V.: Computing circumscription. In: Proceedings of IJCAI’85, pp. 121–127 (1985)

Lifschitz, V.: Pointwise circumscription. In: Ginsberg, M. (ed.) Readings in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, pp. 179–193. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1987)

Lootsma, F.: Multi-criteria Decision Analysis Via Ratio and Difference Judgement. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1999)

Loui, R.: Defeat among arguments: a system of defeasible inference. Comput. Intell. 2, 100–106 (1987)

Lu, T., Boutilier, C.: Learning mallows models with pairwise preferences. In: Proceedings of ICML’11, pp. 145–152 (2011)

Lu, T., Boutilier, C.: Robust approximation and incremental elicitation in voting protocols. In: IJCAI 2011, Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, July 16–22, 2011, pp. 287–293 (2011)

Makinson, D.: General theory of cumulative inference. In: Reinfrank, M., de Kleer, J., Ginsberg, M., Sandewall, R. (eds.) Non-Monotonic Reasoning, LNCS 346, pp. 1–18. Springer, Berlin (1989)

Mally, E.: Grundgesetze des Sollens. Elemente der Logik des Willens. Graz: Leuschner & Leubensky (1926)

Marchant, T.: Towards a theory of MCDM: stepping away from social choice theory. Math. Soc. Sci. 45, 343–363 (2003)

Marichal, J.L., Meyer, P., Roubens, M.: Sorting multi-attribute alternatives: the TOMASO method. Comput. Oper. Res. 32, 861–877 (2005)

Marquis, S., Lang, J., Liberatore, P., Marquis, P.: Expressive power and succinctness of propositional languages for preference representation. In: Proceedings of KR’04, pp. 203–212 (2004)

McCarthy, J.: Circumscription: a form of nonmonotonic reasoning. Artif. Intell. 13, 27–39 (1980)

McCarthy, J.: Applications of circumscription to formalizing of commonsense knowledge. Artif. Intell. 28, 89–116 (1986)

McCarty, L.T.: Modalities over actions: 1. model theory. In: Proceedings of (KR’94), pp. 437–448. Morgan Kaufmann (1994)

McDermott, D.: Non-monotonic logic i. Artif. Intell. 13, 41–72 (1982)

McDermott, D., Doyle, J.: Non-monotonic logic ii. J. ACM 29, 33–57 (1982)

McNamara, P.: Deontic logic. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, on-line. Stanford University, Stanford (2010)

McSherry, D., Stretch, C.: Automating the discovery of recommendation knowledge. In: Proceedings of IJCAI’05, pp. 9–14 (2005)

Minka, T.P.: Expectation propagation for approximate bayesian inference. In: Proceedings of UAI’01, pp. 362–369 (2001)

Modgil, S.: Nested argumentation and its application to decision making over actions. In: Proceedings of ArgMAS’05, pp. 57–73. Springer, Berlin (2006)

Modgil, S.: Reasoning about preferences in argumentation framework. Artif. Intell. 173, 901–934 (2009)

Moore, R.: Semantic considerations on nonmonotonic logic. Artif. Intell. 25, 75–94 (1985)

Moretti, S., Öztürk, M., Tsoukiàs, A.: Preference modelling. In: Ehrgott, M., Greco, S., Figueira, J. (eds.) State of the Art in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. New revised version. Springer, Berlin (to appear)

Moretti, S., Tsoukiàs, A.: Ranking sets of possibly interacting objects using Shapley extensions. In: Proceedings of KR 12, pp. 199–209 (2012)

Nute, D.: Defeasible reasoning and decision support systems. Decis. Support. Syst. 4, 97–110 (1988)

Nute, D. (ed.): Defeasible Deontic Logic. Synthese Library 263. Kluwer (1997)

Orlovsky, S.: Decision making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1, 155–167 (1978)

Ovchinnikov, S.: Structure of fuzzy binary relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 6, 169–195 (1981)

Öztürk, M., Tsoukiàs, A.: Modelling uncertain positive and negative reasons in decision aiding. Decis. Support. Syst. 43, 1512–1526 (2007)

Öztürk, M., Tsoukiàs, A.: Bipolar preference modelling and aggregation in decision support. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 23, 970–984 (2008)

Öztürk, M., Tsoukiàs, A., Vincke, Ph.: Preference modelling. In: Ehrgott, M., Greco, S., Figueira, J. (eds.) State of the Art in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, pp. 27–72. Springer, Berlin (2005)

Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1988)

Pearl, J.: System Z: A natural ordering of defaults with tractable applications to default reasoning. In: Proceedings of TARK’90, pp. 121–135 (1990)

Pearl, J., Geffner, H.: Probabilistic semantics for a subset of default reasoning. Technical Report CSD-8700XX, R-93-III, Computer Science Dept., UCLA (1988)

Peintner, B., Viappiani, P., Yorke-Smith, N.: Preferences in interactive systems: technical challenges and case studies. AI Mag. 29(4), 13–24 (2008)

Perelman, C.: Justice, Law and Argument. Reidel, Dordrecht (1980)

Perelman, C., Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.: The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame (1969)

Perny, P., Pirlot, M., Tsoukiàs, A.: Proceedings of ADT 2013. LNAI 8176. Springer, Berlin (2013)

Perny, P., Roy, B.: The use of fuzzy outranking relations in preference modelling. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 49, 33–53 (1992)

Perny, P., Tsoukiàs, A.: On the continuous extension of a four valued logic for preference modelling. In: Proceedings of IPMU’98, pp. 302–309 (1998)

Pirlot, M., Vincke, P.: Semi Orders. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)

Pollock, J.: Knowledge and Justification. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1974)

Pollock, J.: Defeasible reasoning. Cogn. Sci. 11, 481–518 (1987)

Prakken, H.: A tool in modelling disagreement in law: preferring the most specific argument. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 165–174 (1991)

Prakken, H.: An argumentation framework in default logic. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 9, 91–131 (1993)

Prakken, H.: Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. J. Log. Comput. 15, 1009–1040 (2005)

Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7, 25–75 (1997)

Price, R., Messinger, P.R.: Optimal recommendation sets: covering uncertainty over user preferences. In: Proceedings of AAAI’05, pp. 541–548 (2005)

Pu, P., Chen, L.: User-involved preference elicitation for product search and recommender systems. AI Mag. 29(4), 93–103 (2008)

Ramsey, F.: Foundations of mathematics and other logical essays. In: Braithwaite, R.B. (ed.) Collection of Papers Publishded Posthumously. Routledge & P. Kegan, London (1931)

Reiter, R.: Logic and dala bases. In: Gallaire, H., Minker, J. (eds.) On closed World Data Bases, pp. 55–76. Plenum Press, New York (1978)

Reiter, R.: A logic for default reasoning. Artif. Intell. 13, 81–132 (1980)

Rescher, N.: The logic of preference. In: Topics in Philosophical Logic, Synthese Library, vol. 17, pp. 287–320. Springer, Berlin (1968)

Rescher, N.: Introduction to Value Theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1969)

Roberts, F.: Measurement theory, with applications to Decision Making, Utility and the Social Sciences. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1979)

Roberts, F.: Computer science and decision theory. Ann. Oper. Res. 163, 209–253 (2008)

Roberts, F., Tsoukiàs, A.: Special issue on computer science and decision theory. Ann. Oper. Res. 163, 270 (2008)

Rossi, F.: Constraints and preferences: modelling frameworks and multi-agent settings. In: Della Riccia, G., Dubois, D., Kruse, R., Lenz, H. (eds.) Similarities and Preferences, CISM series, pp. 305–320. Springer, Berlin (2008)

Rossi, F., Tsoukiàs, A.: Proceedings of ADT 2009. LNAI 5783. Springer, Berlin (2009)

Rossi, F., Venable, K., Walsh, T.: mCP nets: representing and reasoning with preferences of multiple agents. In: Proceedings of AAAI’04, pp. 729–734 (2004)

Rossi, F., Venable, K., Walsh, T.: Preferences in constraint satisfaction and optimization. AI Mag. 29, 58–68 (2008)

Rossi, F., Venable, K., Walsh, T.: A short introduction to preferences Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Morgan & Claypool (2011)

Roubens, M., Vincke, P.: Preference Modeling. LNEMS 250. Springer, Berlin (1985)

Roy, B.: Partial preference analysis and decision aid: The fuzzy outranking relation concept. In: Bell, D., Keeney, R., Raiffa, H. (eds.) Conflicting Objectives in Decisions, pp. 40–75. Wiley, New York (1977)

Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Planning, Piority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New york (1980)

Saaty, T.L.: An exposition on the ahp in reply to the paper ”remarks on the analytic hierarchy process”. Manag. Sci. 36(3), 259–268 (1990). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2631947

Salo, A., Keisler, J., Morton, A.: Portfolio Management. Springer, Berlin (2011)

Samuelson, P.: Probability and the attempts to measure utility. Econ. Rev. 1, 117–126 (1950)

Sartor, G.: A formal model of legal argumentation. Ratio Juris 7, 212–226 (1994)

Savage, L.: The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York (1954). Second revised edition, 1972

Schweizer, B., Sclar, A.: Probabilistic Metric Spaces. North Holland, Amsterdam (1983)

Shoham, Y.: A semantical approach to nonmonotonic logics Proceedings of the Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, pp. 275–279 (1987)

Shoham, Y.: Nonmonotonic logics: meaning and utility. In: Proceedings of IJCAI’87, pp. 388–393 (1987)

Shoham, Y.: Reasoning About Change. MIT Press, Boston (1987)

Simari, G., Loui, R.: A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artif. Intell. 53, 125–157 (1992)

Sinz, C., Haag, A., Narodytska, N., Walsh, T., Gelle, E., Sabin, M., Junker, U., O’Sullivan, B., Rabiser, R., Dhungana, D., Grünbacher, P., Lehner, K., Federspiel, C., Naus, D.: Configuration. IEEE Intell. Syst. 22(1), 78–90 (2007)

Smith, T.: Legal expert systems: discussion of theoretical assumptions. Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht (1994)

Smyth, B.: Case-based recommendation. In: The Adaptive Web, LNCS 4321, pp. 342–376. Springer, Berlin (2007)

Sycara, K.: Persuasive argumentation in negotiation. Theor. Decis. 28 (1990)

Tan, Y.H., van der Torre, L.: How to combine ordering and minimizing in a deontic logic based on preferences. In: Deontic Logic, Agency and Normative Systems. Proceedings of the ΔEON’96 Workshop in Computing, pp. 216–232. Springer, Berlin (1996)

Tanguiane, A.S.: Aggregation and Representation of Preferences. Springer, Berlin (1991)

Thomason, R., Horty, J.: Logics for inheritance theory. In: Reinfrank, M., de Kleer, J., Ginsberg, M., Sandewall, E. (eds.) Non-Monotonic Reasoning, LNAI 346, pp. 220–237. Springer, Berlin (1987)

van der Torre, L.: Reasoning about obligations: Defeasibility in preference-based deontic logic. Ph.D. thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam (1997)

Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1958)

Touretzky, D.S.: A skeptic’s menagerie: conflictors, preemptors, reinstaters, and zombies in nonmonotonic inheritance. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-91), pp. 478–483. Morgan Kaufmann (1991)

Touretzky, D.S., Horty, J.F., Thomas, R.H.: A clash of intuitions: the current state of nonmonotonic multiple inheritance systems. In: IJCAI-87, pp. 476–482. Morgan Kaufmann (1987)

Trotter, W.: Combinatorics and partially ordered sets. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1992)

Tsoukiàs, A.: Preference modelling as a reasoning process: a new way to face uncertainty in multiple criteria decision support systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 55, 309–318 (1991)

Tsoukiàs, A.: A first-order, four valued, weakly paraconsistent logic and its relation to rough sets semantics. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 12, 85–108 (2002)

Tsoukiàs, A., Perny, P., Vincke, P.: From concordance/discordance to the modelling of positive and negative reasons in decision aiding. In: Bouyssou, D., Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Perny, P., Slowinski, R., Vanderpooten, D., Vincke, P. (eds.) Aiding Decisions with Multiple Criteria: Essays in Honour of Bernard Roy, pp. 147–174. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)

Tsoukiàs, A., Vincke, P.: A new axiomatic foundation of partial comparability. Theor. Decis. 39, 79–114 (1995)

Tsoukiàs, A., Vincke, P.: Extended preference structures in MCDA. In: Climaco, J. (ed.) Multicriteria Analysis, pp. 37–50. Springer, Berlin (1997)

Tsoukiàs, A., Vincke, P.: Double threshold orders: a new axiomatization. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 7, 285–301 (1998)

Turunen, E., Öztürk, M., Tsoukiàs, A.: Paraconsistent semantics for pavelka style fuzzysentential logic. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 161, 1926–1940 (2010)

Uckelman, J.: Alice and Bob will fight: the problem of electing a committee in the presence of candidate interdependence. In: Proceedings of (MPREF’10), pp. 73–78 (2010)

van Benthem, J., Girard, P., Roy, O.: Everything else being equal: a modal logic approach to ceteris paribus preferences. J. Philos. Log. 38, 83125 (2009)

van Dalen, D.: Logic and Structure. Springer, Berlin (1983)

van Fraassen, B.: The logic of conditional obligation. J. Philos. Log. 1, 417–438 (1972)

van Fraassen, B.: Values and the heart’s command. J. Philos. 70, 5–19 (1973)

Viappiani, P., Boutilier, C.: Regret-based optimal recommendation sets in conversational recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 101–108 (2009)

Viappiani, P., Boutilier, C.: Optimal bayesian recommendation sets and myopically optimal choice query sets. In: Proceedings of NIPS’10, pp. 2352–2360 (2010)

Viappiani, P., Kroer, C.: Robust optimization of recommendation sets with the maximin utility criterion. In: Proceedings of ADT’13, pp. 411–424 (2013)

von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of games and economic behaviour, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1947)

von Wright, G.: Deontic logic. Mind 60, 1–15 (1951)

von Wright, G.: An Essay in Modal Logic. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1951)

von Wright, G.: The logic of Preference. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1963)

von Wright, G.: Deontic logic and the theory of conditions. In: Hilpinen, R. (ed.) Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, pp. 159–177. Reidel, Dordrecht (1971)

von Wright, G.: The logic of preference reconsidered. Theor. Decis. 3, 140–169 (1972)

Wagstaff, K.L., desJardins, M., Eaton, E.: Modelling and learning user preferences over sets. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 22, 237–268 (2010)

Wang, T., Boutilier, C.: Incremental utility elicitation with the minimax regret decision criterion. In: Proceedings of IJCAI’03, pp. 309–316 (2003)

Wilson, N.: Consistency and constrained optimisation for conditional preferences. In: Proceedings of ECAI’04, pp. 888–894 (2004)

Wilson, N.: Extending CP-nets with stronger conditional preference statements. In: Proceedings of AAAI’04, pp. 735–741 (2004)

Wilson, N.: Efficient inference for expressive comparative preference languages. In: Proceedings of IJCAI’09, pp. 961–966 (2009)

Yaman, F., Walsh, T., Littman, M., desJardins, M.: Learning lexicographic preference models. In: Fürnkranz, J., Hüllermeier, E. (eds.) Preference Learning, pp. 251–272. Springer, Berlin (2011)

Yu, P., Wan, W., Lee, P.: Decision tree modeling for ranking data. In: Fürnkranz, J., Hüllermeier, E. (eds.) Preference Learning, pp. 83–106. Springer, Berlin (2011)