Peut-on faire des échographies obstétricales de qualité chez les patientes obèses ? Étude monocentrique sur 30 mois
Tài liệu tham khảo
WHO, 2004, Controlling the global obesity epidemic
Yu, 2006, Obesity in pregnancy, BJOG, 113, 1117, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00991.x
Weichert, 2010, Obstetrical sonography in obese women: a review, J Clin Ultrasound, 39, 209, 10.1002/jcu.20767
Blondel, 2010, La situation périnatale en France en 2010, Étude et resultats, 775, 1
Catalano, 2007, Management of obesity in pregnancy, Obstet Gynecol, 109, 419, 10.1097/01.AOG.0000253311.44696.85
Cedergren, 2004, Maternal morbid obesity and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome, Obstet Gynecol, 103, 219, 10.1097/01.AOG.0000107291.46159.00
Weiss, 2004, Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate – a population-based screening study, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 190, 1091, 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.058
Thornburg, 2009, Fetal anatomic evaluation in the overweight and obese gravida, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 33, 670, 10.1002/uog.6401
Tranquart, 1999, Clinical use of ultrasound tissue harmonic imaging, Ultrasound Med Biol, 25, 889, 10.1016/S0301-5629(99)00060-5
Aagaard-Tillery, 2010, Influence of maternal BMI on genetic sonography in the FaSTER trial, Prenat Diagn, 30, 14, 10.1002/pd.2399
Paladini, 2009, Sonography in obese and overweight pregnant women: clinical, medicolegal and technical issues, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 33, 720, 10.1002/uog.6393
CNTE. Rapport du Comité national technique de l’échographie de dépistage prénatal, 81. 2005.
Salomon, 2008, A score-based method for quality control of fetal images at routine second-trimester ultrasound examination, Prenat Diagn, 28, 822, 10.1002/pd.2016
Salomon, 2006, Feasibility and reproducibility of an image-scoring method for quality control of fetal biometry in the second trimester, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 27, 34, 10.1002/uog.2665
ACOG., 2004, Untrasonography in pregnancy, Obstet Gynecol, 104, 1449
AIUM, 2003, AIUM Practice Guideline for the performance of an antepartum obstetric ultrasound examination, J Ultrasound Med, 22, 1116, 10.7863/jum.2003.22.10.1116
RCOG, 2000
Nelson, 1993, The AIUM/ACR antepartum obstetrical sonographic guidelines: expectations for detection of anomalies, J Ultrasound Med, 12, 189, 10.7863/jum.1993.12.4.189
Capmas, 2010, Using Z-scores to compare biometry data obtained during prenatal ultrasound screening by midwives and physicians, Prenat Diagn, 30, 40, 10.1002/pd.2417
Salomon, 2005, Analysis of Z-score distribution for the quality control of fetal ultrasound measurements at 20–24 weeks, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 26, 750, 10.1002/uog.2640
Biau, 2008, CUSUM: a tool for ongoing assessment of performance, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 31, 252, 10.1002/uog.5270
Herman, 1998, Nuchal translucency audit: a novel image-scoring method, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 12, 398, 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12060398.x
Herman, 1999, Implementation of nuchal translucency image-scoring method during ongoing audit, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 14, 388, 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14060388.x
Herman, 1999, Utilization of the nuchal translucency image-scoring method during training of new examiners, Fetal Diagn Ther, 14, 234, 10.1159/000020928
Stothard, 2009, Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis, JAMA, 301, 636, 10.1001/jama.2009.113
Hendler, 2005, Suboptimal second-trimester ultrasonographic visualization of the fetal heart in obese women: should we repeat the examination?, J Ultrasound Med, 24, 1205, 10.7863/jum.2005.24.9.1205
Hendler, 2004, The impact of maternal obesity on midtrimester sonographic visualization of fetal cardiac and craniospinal structures, Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, 28, 1607, 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802759
Benacerraf, 2010, A technical tip on scanning obese gravidae, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 35, 615, 10.1002/uog.7550