Các góc nhìn về tương tác cảm giác-vận động giữa người với người cho thiết kế robot phục hồi chức năng

Andrew Sawers1, Lena H Ting1
1Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA

Tóm tắt

Các tương tác vật lý giữa bệnh nhân và nhà trị liệu trong quá trình phục hồi chức năng đã trở thành động lực cho thiết kế các robot phục hồi chức năng, tuy nhiên, chúng ta vẫn thiếu hiểu biết cơ bản về các nguyên tắc chi phối các tương tác người-người (HHI) này. Trong bài viết này, chúng tôi xem xét tài liệu và đặt ra các câu hỏi quan trọng chưa có lời giải liên quan đến tương tác cảm giác-vận động trong HHI, có thể hỗ trợ cho việc thiết kế các tương tác người-robot (HRI) và giao diện cảm giác cho phục hồi chức năng. Dựa trên mục tiêu phục hồi chức năng thể chất, chúng tôi xác định ba phân loại con của tương tác cảm giác-vận động: hợp tác cảm giác-vận động, hỗ trợ cảm giác-vận động, và giáo dục cảm giác-vận động. Nghiên cứu trước đây chủ yếu tập trung vào hợp tác cảm giác-vận động và thường giới hạn trong các nhiệm vụ thị giác-vận động khá hạn chế. Hơn nữa, các cơ chế mà qua đó cải thiện hiệu suất được đạt được trong hợp tác cảm giác-vận động với tương tác cảm giác vẫn chưa được biết đến. Chúng tôi đề xuất rằng các ảnh hưởng của việc phân công vai trò, sự dư thừa trong vận động, và trình độ kỹ năng trong hợp tác cảm giác-vận động nên được nghiên cứu một cách rõ ràng. Thêm vào đó, tầm quan trọng của các tương tác cảm giác có thể được làm sáng tỏ hơn trong các nhiệm vụ không yêu cầu phản hồi trực quan. Cuối cùng, các nhiệm vụ vận động hợp tác cho phép cải thiện vận động trong khi thực hiện một mình có thể có liên quan đặc biệt đến robot phục hồi chức năng. Việc xác định các nguyên tắc hướng dẫn tương tác cảm giác-vận động giữa người với người có thể dẫn đến việc phát triển các robot có khả năng tương tác vật lý với con người theo cách trực quan và cảm hứng sinh học hơn, do đó nâng cao kết quả phục hồi chức năng.

Từ khóa

#tương tác cảm giác-vận động #robot phục hồi chức năng #thiết kế tương tác người-robot #hợp tác cảm giác-vận động #hỗ trợ cảm giác-vận động #giáo dục cảm giác-vận động

Tài liệu tham khảo

Oguz SO, Kucukyilmaz A, Metin Sezgin T, Basdogan C: Supporting negotiation behavior with haptics-enabled human-computer interfaces. IEEE Trans Haptics 2012, 5: 274-284. Passenberg C, Groten R, Peer A, Buss M: Towards Real-Time Haptic Assistance Adaptation Optimizing Task Performance and Human Effort. Proceedings of the IEEE World Haptics Conference 2011, 155-160. Duchaine V, Gosselin CM: General Model of Human-Robot Cooperation using A Novel Velocity based Variable Impedance Control. Proceedings of the Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems 2007, 446-451. Mortl A, Lawitzky M, Kucukyilmaz A, Sezgin M, Basdogan C, Hirche S: The role of roles: physical cooperation between humans and robots. Int J Robot Res 2012, 31: 1656-1674. 10.1177/0278364912455366 Evrard P, Kheddar A: Homotopy-Based Controller for Physical Human-Robot Interaction. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication 2009, 1-6. Huegel JC, O’Malley MK: Progressive Haptic and Visual Guidance for Training in a Virtual Dynamic Task. Proceedings of the IEEE Haptics Symposium 2010, 343-350. Lee J, Choi S: Effects of Haptic Guidance and Disturbance on Motor Learning: Potential Advantage of Haptic Disturbance. Proceedings of the IEEE Haptics Symposium 2010, 335-342. Nudehi SS, Mukherjee R, Ghodoussi M: A shared-control approach to haptic interface design for minimally invasive telesurgical training. IEEE Trans Controls Syst Technol 2005, 13: 588-592. Oguz SO, Kucukyilmaz A, Sezgin TM: Haptic Negotiation and Role Exchange for Collaboration in Virtual Environments. Proceedings of the IEEE Haptics Symposium 2010, 371-378. Corteville B, Aertbelien E, De Schutter J, Van Brussel H: Human-Inspired Robot Assistant for Fast Point-to-Point Movements. Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2007, 3639-3644. Morasso P, Casadio M, Giannoni P, Masia L, Sanguineti V, Squeri V, Vergaro E: Desirable Features of a “Humanoid” Robot-Therapist. Proceedings of the International Conference of the IEEE EMBS 2009, 2418-2421. Marchal-Crespo L, Reinkensmeyer DJ: Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009, 6: 20-35. 10.1186/1743-0003-6-20 Colombo G, Joerg M, Schreier R, Dietz V: Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000, 37: 693-700. Krebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML, Volpe BT: Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1998, 6: 75-87. 10.1109/86.662623 Cai LL, Fong AJ, Otoshi CK, Liang Y, Burdick JW, Roy RR, Edgerton VR: Implications of assist-as-needed robotic step training after a complete spinal cord injury on intrinsic strategies of motor learning. J Neurosci 2006, 26: 10564-10568. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2266-06.2006 Riener R, Lünenburger L, Jezernik S, Anderschitz M, Colombo G, Dietz V: Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005, 13: 380-394. 10.1109/TNSRE.2005.848628 Kahn LE, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ: Adaptive Assistance for Guided Force Training in Chronic Stroke. Proceedings of the International Conference of the IEEE EMBS 2004, 2722-2725. Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, Brady K, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Hornby TG: Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke. Neurorehab Neural Re 2009, 23: 5-13. Field-Fote EC, Roach KE: Influence of a locomotor training approach on walking speed and distance in people with chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2011, 91: 48-60. 10.2522/ptj.20090359 Thoroughman KA, Shadmehr R: Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 2000, 407: 742-747. 10.1038/35037588 Berniker M, Körding K: Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization. Nat Neurosci 2008, 11: 1454-1461. 10.1038/nn.2229 Ziegler MD, Zhong H, Roy RR, Edgerton VR: Why variability facilitates spinal learning. J Neurosci 2010, 30: 10720-10726. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1938-10.2010 Shea JB, Morgan RL: Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem 1979, 5: 179-187. Emken JL, Reinkensmeyer DJ: Robot-enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by Transient Dynamic Amplification. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005, 13: 33-39. 10.1109/TNSRE.2004.843173 Kao P-C, Srivastava S, Agrawal SK, Scholz JP: Effect of robotic performance-based error-augmentation versus error-reduction training on the gait of healthy individuals. Gait Posture 2013, 37: 113-120. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.06.025 Patton J, Brown DA, Peshkin M, Santos-Munné JJ, Makhlin A, Lewis E, Colgate EJ, Schwandt D: KineAssist: design and development of a robotic overground gait and Balance therapy device. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008, 15: 131-139. 10.1310/tsr1502-131 Hidler J, Brennan D, Black I, Nichols D, Brady K, Nef T: ZeroG: overground gait and balance training system. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011, 48: 287-298. 10.1682/JRRD.2010.05.0098 Ellis MD, Acosta AM, Yao J, Dewald JPA: Position-dependent torque coupling and associated muscle activation in the hemiparetic upper extremity. Exp Brain Res 2007, 176: 594-602. 10.1007/s00221-006-0637-x Roh J, Rymer WZ, Perreault EJ, Yoo SB, Beer RF: Alterations in upper limb muscle synergy structure in chronic stroke survivors. J Neurophysiol 2013,109(3):768-781. 10.1152/jn.00670.2012 Clark DJ, Ting LH, Zajac FE, Neptune RR, Kautz SA: Merging of healthy motor modules predicts reduced locomotor performance and muscle coordination complexity post-stroke. J Neurophysiol 2010, 103: 844-857. 10.1152/jn.00825.2009 Klingspor V, Demiris J, Kaiser M: Human-robot communication and machine learning. Appl Artif Intell 1997, 11: 719-746. Reed K, Peshkin M, Hartmann MJ, Grabowecky M, Patton J, Vishton PM: Haptically linked dyads: are two motor-control systems better than one? Psychol Sci 2006, 17: 365-366. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01712.x Groten R, Feth D, Goshy H, Peer A, Kenny DA, Buss M: Experimental Analysis of Dominance in Haptic Collaboration. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication 2009, 723-729. Schubö A, Vesper C, Wiesbeck M, Stork S: From Movement Coordination in Applied Human-Human and Human-Robot Interaction. HCI and Usability in Medicine. Volume 4799 2007, 143-154. Glasauer S, Huber M, Basili P, Knoll A, Brandt T: Interacting in Time and Space: Investigating Human-Human and Human-Robot Joint Action. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication 2010, 252-257. Jarrassé N, Charalambous T, Burdet E: A framework to describe, analyze and generate interactive motor behaviors. PLoS One 2012, 7: 1-13. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Lum PS, Lehman SL: Human control of a simple two-hand grasp. Biol Cybern 1992, 67: 553-564. 10.1007/BF00198762 Swinnen SP, Wenderoth N: Two hands, one brain: cognitive neuroscience of bimanual skill. Trends Cogn Sci 2004, 8: 18-25. 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.017 Swinnen SP: Intermanual coordination: from behavioral principles to neural-network interactions. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002, 3: 348-359. 10.1038/nrn807 Obhi SS: Bimanual coordination: an unbalanced field of research. Motor Control 2004, 8: 111-120. Goodrich MA, Schultz AC: Human-robot interaction: a survey. FNT Human-Computer Interaction 2007, 1: 203-275. 10.1561/1100000005 Wegner N, Zeaman D: Team and individual performances on a motor learning task. J Gen Psychol 1956, 55: 127-142. 10.1080/00221309.1956.9920301 Melendez-Calderon A, Komisar V, Ganesh G, Burdet E: Classification of Strategies for Disturbance Attenuation in Human-Human Collaborative Tasks. Proceedings of the International IEEE EMBS Conference 2011, 1-4. Powell D, O’Malley MK: The task-dependent efficacy of shared-control haptic guidance paradigms. IEEE Trans Haptics 2012, 5: 208-219. Todorov E, Jordan MI: Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 2002, 5: 1226-1235. 10.1038/nn963 Scott SH: Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004, 5: 532-546. Wei Y, Bajaj P, Scheidt R, Patton J: Visual Error Augmentation for Enhancing Motor Learning and Rehabilitative Relearning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics 2005, 505-510. Patton JL, Wei YJ, Bajaj P, Scheidt RA: Visuomotor learning enhanced by augmenting instantaneous trajectory error feedback during reaching. PLoS One 2013, 8: 1-6. Manoel E d J, Connolly KJ: Variability and the development of skilled actions. Int J Psychophysiol 1995, 19: 129-147. 10.1016/0167-8760(94)00078-S Ikeura R, Inooka H: Cooperative Force Control in Carrying an Object by Two Humans. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1995, 2307-2311. Rahman MM, Ikeura R, Mizutani K: Control Characteristics of Two Humans in Cooperative Task and Its Application to Robot Control. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation 2000, 1773-1778. Basdogan C, Ho C-H, Srinivasan MA, Slater M: An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 2000, 7: 443-460. 10.1145/365058.365082 Sallnas E, Zhai S: Collaboration meets Fitts’ law: Passing Virtual Objects with and without Haptic Force Feedback. Proceedings of INTERACT Conference on Human-Computer Interaction 2003, 97-104. Gentry S, Feron E, Murray-Smith R: Human-Human Haptic Collaboration in Cyclical Fitts’ Tasks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2005, 3402-3407. van der Wel RPRD, Knoblich G, Sebanz N: Let the force be with us: Dyads exploit haptic coupling for coordination. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2011, 37: 1420-1431. Reed KB, Peshkin MA: Physical collaboration of human-human and human-robot teams. IEEE Trans Haptics 2008, 1: 108-120. Amazeen PG, Schmidt RC, Turvey MT: Frequency detuning of the phase entrainment dynamics of visually coupled rhythmic movements. Biol Cybern 1995, 72: 511-518. 10.1007/BF00199893 Richardson MJ, Marsh KL, Schmidt RC: Effects of visual and verbal interaction on unintentional interpersonal coordination. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2005, 31: 62-79. Schmitt BH, Gilovich T, Goore N, Joseph L: Mere presence and social facilitation: one more time. J Exp Soc Psychol 1986, 22: 242-248. 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90027-2 Ikeura R, Morita A, Mizutani K: Variable-Damping Characteristics in Carrying an Object by Two Humans. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication 1997, 130-134. Woodworth RS, Schlosberg H: Experimental Psychology. Oxford, England: Oxford and IBH Publishing; 1954. Wulf G, Shea CH: Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychon Bull Rev 2002, 9: 185-211. 10.3758/BF03196276 Ahn J, Hogan N: Walking is not like reaching: evidence from periodic mechanical perturbations. PLoS One 2012, 7: 1-12. Gentry S, Wall S, Oakley I: Got Rhythm? Haptic-only Lead and Follow Dancing. Proceedings of EuroHaptics 2003, 481-488. Reed KB, Peshkin M, Hartmann MJ: Haptic Cooperation between People, and between People and Machines. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2006, 2109-2114. Feth D, Groten R, Peer A, Hirche S: Performance related Energy Exchange in Haptic Human-Human Interaction in a Shared Virtual Object Manipulation Task. Proceedings of the Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces 2009, 338-343. Groten R, Feth D, Peer A, Buss M: Shared Decision Making in a Collaborative Task with Reciprocal Haptic Feedback - An Efficiency-Analysis. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2010, 1834-1839. Reed KB, Peshkin M, Hartmann MJ: Kinesthetic Interaction. Proceedings of the International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics 2005, 569-574. Kautz SA, Hull ML: A theoretical basis for interpreting the force applied to the pedal in cycling. J Biomech 1993, 26: 155-165. 10.1016/0021-9290(93)90046-H Groten R, Feth D, Peer A, Buss M: Efficiency Analysis in a Collaborative Task with Reciprocal Haptic Feedback. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2009, 461-466. Groten R, Feth D, Klatzky RL: The role of haptic feedback for the integration of intentions in shared task execution. IEEE Trans Haptics 2013, 6: 94-105. Huang HJ, Kram R, Ahmed AA: Reduction of metabolic cost during motor learning of arm reaching dynamics. J Neurosci 2012, 32: 2182-2190. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4003-11.2012 Hogan N: An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements. J Neurosci 1984, 4: 2745-2754. McKay JL, Ting LH: Optimization of muscle activity for task-level goals predicts complex changes in limb forces across biomechanical contexts. PLoS Comput Biol 2012, 8: 1-17. Lockhart DB, Ting LH: Optimal sensorimotor transformations for balance. Nat Neurosci 2007, 10: 1329-1336. 10.1038/nn1986 Latash ML, Gottlieb GL: An equilibrium-point model for fast, single-joint movement: I. emergence of strategy-dependent EMG patterns. J Mot Behav 1991, 23: 163-177. 10.1080/00222895.1991.10118360 Ting LH, Chvatal SA, Safavynia SA, Lucas McKay J: Review and perspective: neuromechanical considerations for predicting muscle activation patterns for movement. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Engng 2012, 28: 1003-1014. 10.1002/cnm.2485 Ting LH, McKay JL: Neuromechanics of muscle synergies for posture and movement. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2007, 17: 622-628. 10.1016/j.conb.2008.01.002 Ting LH, Chvatal SA: Decomposing Muscle Activity in Motor Tasks. Motor Control Theories, Experiments and Applications Oxford University Press: New York 2010, 102-138. Safavynia SA, Torres-Oviedo G, Ting LH: Muscle synergies: Implications for clinical evaluation and rehabilitation of movement. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2011, 17: 16-24. 10.1310/sci1701-16 Sofianidis G, Hatzitaki V, Grouios G, Johannsen L, Wing A: Somatosensory driven interpersonal synchrony during rhythmic sway. Hum Movement Sci 2012, 31: 553-566. 10.1016/j.humov.2011.07.007 Knoblich G, Jordan JS: Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2003, 29: 1006-1016. Zajonc RB: Social facilitation. Science 1965, 149: 269-274. 10.1126/science.149.3681.269 Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM: Principles of Neural Science. 4th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, Health Professions Division; 2000. Feth D, Groten R, Peer A, Buss M: Control-Theoretic Model of Haptic Human-Human Interaction in a Pursuit Tracking Task. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium of Robot and Human Interactive Communication 2009, 1106-1111. Galvez JA, Kerdanyan G, Maneekobkunwong S, Weber R, Scott M, Harkema SJ, Reinkensmeyer DJ: “Measuring Human Trainers” Skill for the Design of Better Robot Control Algorithms for Gait Training after Spinal Cord Injury. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics 2005, 231-234. Armstrong TR PhD thesis. In Training for the Production of Memorized Movement Patterns. University of Michigan, Department of Psychology; 1970. Sidaway B, Ahn S, Boldeau P, Griffin S, Noyes B, Pelletier K: A comparison of manual guidance and knowledge of results in the learning of a weight-bearing skill. J Neurol Phys Ther 2008, 32: 32-38. 10.1097/NPT.0b013e318165948d Winstein CJ, Pohl PS, Lewthwaite R: Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: support for the guidance hypothesis. Res Q Exerc Sport 1994, 65: 316. 10.1080/02701367.1994.10607635 Schmidt R, Lee DL: Motor Control and Learning: a Behavioral Emphasis. Human Kinetics: Champaign; 2005. Wulf G, Toole T: Physical assistance devices in complex motor skill learning: benefits of a self-controlled practice schedule. Res Q Exerc Sport 1999, 70: 265-272. 10.1080/02701367.1999.10608045 Domingo A, Ferris DP: Effects of physical guidance on short-term learning of walking on a narrow beam. Gait Posture 2009, 30: 464-468. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.07.114 Ericsson KA, Lehmann AC: Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annu Rev Psychol 1996, 47: 273-305. 10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.273 Casadio M, Ranganathan R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA: The body-machine interface: a new perspective on an old theme. J Mot Behav 2012, 44: 419-433. 10.1080/00222895.2012.700968 Bosco G, Poppele RE, Eian J: Reference frames for spinal proprioception: limb endpoint based or joint-level based? J Neurophysiol 2000, 83: 2931-2945. Chang YH, Auyang AG, Scholz JP, Nichols TR: Whole limb kinematics are preferentially conserved over individual joint kinematics after peripheral nerve injury. J Exp Biol 2009, 212: 3511-3521. 10.1242/jeb.033886 Hogan N: The mechanics of multi-joint posture and movement control. Biol Cybern 1985, 52: 315-331. 10.1007/BF00355754 Ferris DP, Liang K, Farley CT: Runners adjust leg stiffness for their first step on a new running surface. J Biomech 1999, 32: 787-794. 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00078-0 Perreault EJ, Kirsch RF, Crago PE: Voluntary control of static endpoint stiffness during force regulation tasks. J Neurophysiol 2002, 87: 2808-2816. Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Hogan N, Bizzi E: Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans. J Neurosci 1985, 5: 2732-2743. Krishnamoorthy V, Latash ML, Scholz JP, Zatsiorsky VM: Muscle synergies during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons. Exp Brain Res 2003, 152: 281-292. 10.1007/s00221-003-1574-6 Herr H, Popovic M: Angular momentum in human walking. J Exp Biol 2008, 211: 467-481. 10.1242/jeb.008573 Bernstein NA: The Co-Ordination and Regulation of Movements. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press; 1967. Scholz JP, Schöner G, Latash ML: Identifying the control structure of multijoint coordination during pistol shooting. Exp Brain Res 2000, 135: 382-404. 10.1007/s002210000540 Darling WG, Cooke JD: Changes in the variability of movement trajectories with practice. J Mot Behav 1987, 19: 291-309. 10.1080/00222895.1987.10735414 Ranganathan R, Newell KM: Influence of motor learning on utilizing path redundancy. Neurosci Lett 2010, 469: 416-420. 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.12.041 Scott SH: Apparatus for measuring and perturbing shoulder and elbow joint positions and torques during reaching. J Neurosci Methods 1999, 89: 119-127. 10.1016/S0165-0270(99)00053-9 Gentry S, Feron E: Musicality Experiments in Lead and Follow Dance. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 2004, 984-988.