Perspectives on Relevancy Assessment for Non-Standard Ecotoxicity Data in Environment Quality Standard derivation: Examples for Diclofenac

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 105 - Trang 665-670 - 2020
Graham Merrington1, Dean Leverett1, Adam Peters1, Jim Ryan2
1wca environment Ltd, Faringdon, UK
2GSK, Ware, UK

Tóm tắt

A key step in deriving an Environmental Quality Standard (EQS) is assessing the reliability and relevance of the underpinning ecotoxicity data. While the assessment of data reliability is relatively well established, the detailed evaluation of data relevancy is a more recent development. We applied broadly accepted relevancy criteria to a series of non-standard ecotoxicity studies on diclofenac, focusing on some aspects that should be accounted for in studies used in EQS derivation. Specific relevancy issues include potential experimental bias, claimed ‘significant effects’ that are indistinguishable from controls, or within the range of normal, and lack of environmental applicability. We highlight that rigorous, comprehensive and, where necessary, specialist assessment of data relevancy for studies potentially applicable for EQS setting is critical if studies are to be appropriately used regulatory decision-making. We provide recommendations for researchers and environmental practitioners to ensure robust accounting of relevancy in non-standard studies is undertaken.

Tài liệu tham khảo

ANZG (2018) Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. Australian and New Zealand Governments and Australian state and territory governments, Canberra ACT, Australia. Available at www.waterquality.gov.au/anz-guidelines

Birzle C (2015) Etablierung und Validierung quantitativ-morphologischer Parameter bei Regenbogenforellen im Rahmen ökotoxikologischer Fragestellungen. PhD-Thesis Ludiwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich. ISBN: 978-3-8439-2059-9. Pp292

Carvalho RN, Marinov D, Loos R, Napierska D, Chirico N, Lettieri T (2016) Monitoring-based Exercise: Second Review of the Priority Substances List under the Water Framework Directive. Monitoring-based exercise. Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Water Resources Unit TP 121, Ispra, Italy. Pp301

Crissman JW, Goodman DG, Hildebrandt PK, Maronpot RR, Prater DA, Riley JH, Seaman WJ, Thake DC (2004) Best practices guideline: toxicologic histopathology. Toxicol Pathol 32:126–131

EC (European Commission) (2018) Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) Guidance Document No. 27 Technical Guidance For Deriving Environmental Quality Standards. European Communities. Revised Edition

ECHA (2011) Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.4: Evaluation of available information. Version 1.1. European Chemicals Agency. Accessed September 2011: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13643/information_requirements_r4_en.pdf/d6395ad2-1596-4708-ba86-0136686d205e

Lewis RW, Billington R, Debryune E, Gamer A, Lang B, Carpanini F (2002) Recognition of adverse and nonadverse effects in toxicity studies. Toxicol Pathol 30:66–74

Schwarz S, Schmieg H, Scheurer M, Koehler HR, Triebskorn R (2017) Effects of NSAID diclofenac on the survival, health and behaviour of embryonic and juvenile brown trout Salmo trutta f. fario. Sci Total Environ 607–608:1026–1036

UBA (Umweltbundesamt) (2018) EQS DATASHEET, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARD DICLOFENAC. Dossier Diclofenac_Draft_JRC-2017_V4.1