Penetrating a wall of introspection: a critical attrition analysis

Cultural Studies of Science Education - Tập 8 - Trang 87-115 - 2012
Bjørn Friis Johannsen1, Camilla Østerberg Rump1, Cedric Linder2
1Department of Science Education, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
2Division of Physics Education, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Tóm tắt

This paper presents a critical analysis of student discourse on attrition as it unfolds in interviews on early departure from higher education. A synthesis of relevant studies and modelling done in the field shows that essential aspects affecting attrition and retention can be effectively conceptualized and acted upon in terms of the interplay between student and institution. These aspects were used in combination with James Gee’s notion of Discourse models to design a unique framing for interpretation of interviews aimed at bringing out new causal dynamics that lie in this interplay. To illustrate this interpretation, Aristotle’s notion of four causes is used. The analysis presented is a study of interviews with seven former physics students about their early departure. This framing of the analysis was necessary because the students’ description of how they understood their actions did not explicitly reveal interplay between student and institution. These details lay behind a ‘wall of introspection’ that otherwise posed a serious challenge to the use of student testimony as direct means to identify and address issues of early departure. The results are used to discuss research implications.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Allen, D. (1999). Desire to finish college: an empiricial link between motivation and persistence. Research in higher education, 40, 461–485.

Andersen, N. O., & Laursen, K. B. (Eds.). (2003). Studieforløbsundersøgelser i naturvidenskab—en antologi (Vol. 5). Copenhagen: Center for Naturfagenes Didaktik.

Appel, M. (2007). Förebygga, förstå och förhindra. En åtgärdsinriktad intervjustudie om studieavbrott på fyra olika utbildningsprogram vid Uppsala universitet. Uppsala: Enheten för kvalitet och utvärdering.

Aquinas, T. (1272/1961). Commentary on the metaphysics (J. P. Rowan, Trans., 1st ed.). Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.

Bean, J. P., & Metzner, B. S. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55, 485–540.

Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. Towards a new modernity. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead Berkshire: Open University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

Braxton, J. M., Sullivan, A. V. S., & Johnson, R. M., Jr. (1997). Appraising Tinto’s theory of college student departure. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XII, pp. 107–164). Bronx: Agathon Press.

Braxton, J. M., Vesper, N., & Hossler, D. (1995). Expectations for college and student persistence. Research in higher education, 36, 595–612.

Briggs, B. H. (1976). Student attitudes to physics. Physics Education, 11, 483–487.

Brinkmann, S. (2007). Could interviews be epistemic? An alternative to qualitative opinion polling. Qualitative Inquiry, 13, 1116–1138.

Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Cabrera, A. F., Nora, A., & Casteñeda, M. B. (1993). College persistence: Structural equations modeling test of an integrated model of student retention. The Journal of Higher Education, 64, 123–139.

Cohen, S. M. (2009). Aristotle’s metaphysics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (spring 2009 ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/aristotle-metaphysics/.

Davies, R., & Elias, P. (2003). Dropping out: a study of early leavers from higher education (research report 386). London: Department for Education and Skills.

Elby, A. (1999). Another reason that physics students learn by rote. American Journal of Physics, 67, S52–S57.

Engstrom, C., & Tinto, V. (2007). Pathways to student success: the impact of learning communities on the success of academically under-prepared college students. Syracuse: School of Education, Syracuse University. Final report prepared for the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

European Commission. (2004). Europe needs more scientists!. Brussels: Directorate-General for Research, High Level Group on Human Resources for Science and Technology in Europe.

Gee, J. P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis. Theory and method (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.

Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis. Theory and method (3rd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.

Godfrey, E., Aubrey, T., & King, R. (2010). Who leaves and who stays? Retention and attrition in engineering education. Engineering Education, 5(2), 26–40.

Haggis, T. (2006). Pedagogies for diversity: Retaining critical challenge amidst fears of ‘dumbing down’. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 521–535.

Haggis, T. (2009a). Student learning research: a broader view. In M. Tight (Ed.), International handbook of higher education (pp. 23–25). London: Routledge.

Haggis, T. (2009b). What have we been thinking of? A critical overview of 40 years of student learning research in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 377–390.

Hasse, C. (2002). Gender diversity in play with physics: The problem of premises for participation in activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9, 250–269.

Hasse, C. (2007). Learning through reactions—The social designation of institutional cultural code-curricula. In C. H. Sørensen (Ed.), Body and learning: A transdisciplinary approach (pp. 193–215). Copenhagen: Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitets Forlag.

Hazari, Z., Tai, R. H., & Sadler, P. M. (2007). Gender differences in introductory university physics performance: The influence of high school physics preparation and affective factors. Science Education, 91, 847–876.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1807/1977). Phenomenology of spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press (originally published in 1807).

Hineline, P. N. (2003). When we speak of intentions. In K. A. Lattal & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Behavior theory and philosophy (pp. 203–221). New York: Kluwer.

Holland, D., Skinner, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr, & Cain, C. (2001). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Holmegaard, H. T., Ulriksen, L., & Madsen, L. M. (2011). The process of choosing what to study. A longitudinal study of upper secondary students’ identity work when choosing higher education (manuscript submitted for publication).

Jenkins, R. (2002). Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.

Johannsen, B. F. (2007). Attrition in university physics. Dissertation for the degree of Licentiate of Philosophy in Physics and Physics Education Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala.

Killeen, P. R. (2001). The four causes of behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 136–140.

Knudsen, J. M., & Hjorth, P. G. (2000). Elements of Newtonian mechanics. Including nonlinear dynamics. Third, revised and enlarged edition. Berlin: Springer.

Kost-Smith, L. E., Pollock, S. J., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2010). Gender disparities in second-semester college physics: The incremental effects of a “smog of bias”. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 6(2), 020112.

Kvale, S. (1983). The qualitative research interview: A phenomenological and a hermeneutical mode of understanding. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 14, 171–196.

Kvale, S. (2006). Dominance through interviews and dialogues. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 480–500.

Lardner, E., & Malnarich, G. (2008). A new era in learning. Why the pedagogy of intentional integration matters. Change, 40(4), 30–37.

Lawrence, J. (2005). Re-conceptualising attrition and retenation: Integrating theoretical, research and student perspectives. Studies in Learning, Evaluation, Innovation and Development, 2(3), 16–33.

Laws, P. W. (1997). Millikan Lecture 1996: Promoting active learning based on physics education research in introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 65, 14–21.

Mastekaasa, A., & Smeby, J.-C. (2008). Educational choice and persistence in male- and female-dominated fields. Higher Education, 55, 189–202.

Mullin, F. J. (1948). Selection of medical students. Academic Medicine, 23, 163–170.

Nora, A., Cabrera, A. F., Hagedorn, L. S., & Pascarella, E. T. (1996). Differential impacts of academic and social experiences on college-related behavioral outcomes across different ethnic and gender groups at four-year institutions. Research in higher education, 37, 427–450.

OECD. (2008). Encouraging student interest in science and technology studies. Global Science Forum. Paris: OECD.

OECD. (2010). Education at a glance 2010. Paris: OECD Directorate for Education.

Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students. Volume 2. A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Perkins, K. K., Gratny, M. M., Adams, W. K., Finkelstein, N. D., & Wieman, C. E. (2005). Towards characterizing the relationship between students’ self-reported interest in and their surveyed beliefs about physics. In P. Heron, L. McCullough, & J. Marx (Eds.), 2005 Physics education research conference proceedings (pp. 137–140). Melville: AIP Press.

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.

Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul. The shaping of the private self (2nd ed.). Sidmouth: Free Association Books.

Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2006). Contradictions in theorizing and implementing communities in education. Educational Research Review, 1, 27–40.

Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

Sellars, W., Rorty, R., & Brandom, R. (1997). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Oxford: Westview Press.

Tierney, W. G. (2000). Power, identity and the dilemma of college student departure. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 213–234). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89–125.

Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Tinto, V. (2006–2007). Research and practice of student retention: What next? Journal of College Student Retention, 8, 1–19.

Tobias, S. (1985). Math anxiety and physics: some thoughts on learning ‘difficult’ subjects. Physics Today, 38(6), 60–68.

Tobias, S. (1990). They’re not dumb, they’re different: Stalking the second tier. Tucson, Arizona: Research Corporation.

Ulriksen, L. (2009). The implied student. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 517–532.

Ulriksen, L., Madsen, L. M., & Holmegaard, H. T. (2010). What do we know about explanations for drop out/opt out among young people from STM higher education programmes? Studies in Science Education, 46, 209–244.

Yorke, M., & Longden, B. (2004). Retention and student success in higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Yorke, M., & Longden, B. (2008). The first year experience of higher education in the UK. York: The Higher Education Academy.

Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2005). Integration and adaptation: Approaches to the student retention and achievement puzzle. Active Learning in Higher Education, 6, 46–59.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Cultural Studies of Science Education

Tập 8

87-115

Thông tin tác giả