Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: The role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali

Journal of Rural Studies - Tập 23 - Trang 23-37 - 2007
Stephan Rist1, Mani Chidambaranathan2, Cesar Escobar3, Urs Wiesmann4, Anne Zimmermann5
1Centre for Development and Environment (CDE) and Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) North-South, University of Bern, Steigerhubelstrasse 3, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
2SAMPARK, No. 120/A, 17th Main, KHP colony, 5th Block, 2nd Cross, Near Masjid, above Apex Bank, Koramangala, Bangalore 560 095, Karnataka, India
3Agroecología Universidad Cochabamba (AGRUCO), Casilla 3392, Cochabamba, Bolivia
4Institute of Geography, Centre for Development and Environment (CDE) and Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) North-South, University of Bern, Steigerhubelstrasse 3, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
5Centre for Development and Environment (CDE) and Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) North-South, Steigerhubelstrasse 3, 3008 Bern, Switzerland

Tài liệu tham khảo

Berger, 2003, Reflections on governance: power relations and policy making in regional sustainable development, J. Environ. Policy Plann., 5, 219, 10.1080/1523908032000154160

Bouwen, 2004, Multi-party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management, J. Commun. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 14, 137, 10.1002/casp.777

Brugue, 2005, New-style councils, new-style councillors: from local government to local governance, Governance, 18, 197, 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00273.x

Buttoud, 2002, A ‘mixed model’ for the formulation of a multipurpose mountain forest policy. Theory vs. practice on the example of Kyrgyzstan, Forest Policy Econom., 4, 149, 10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00014-X

CDE, 1998. Autodidactic Learning for Sustainability—Approach and Concept. Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), University of Bern, Bern.

Cissé, A., Kamissoko, S., Konaté, F., 2004. Evaluation des potentiels et des limites des processus d’apprentissage social et de négociation pour la gestion durable des ressources naturelles, et de relations avec des modules de formation autodidacte, pp. 50. Bamako: Réseau des modérateurs de la formation autodidacte en Mali.

Dewulf, 2004, How issues get framed and reframed when different communities meet: a multi-level analysis of a collaborative soil conservation initiative in the Ecuadorian Andes, J. Commun. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 14, 177, 10.1002/casp.772

Escobar, C., 2004. Aprendizaje Autodidacta para la Sostenibilidad y Percepciones Campesinas sobre la Organización del Territorio. Caso de la Comunidad Qullpapata en la Microcuenca Sisaqeña del Municipio de Tacopaya. Agroecología Universidad de Cochabamba. Universidad Mayor de San Simón, Bolivia.

Funtowitz, 1993, Science for the post-normal age, Futures, 25, 739, 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L

Gibbons, 1994

Goss, 2001

Habermas, 1984

Haverkort, 2003

Healey, 1997

Herbert-Cheshire, 2004, From risky to responsible: expert knowledge and the governing of community-led rural development, J. Rural Stud., 20, 289, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2003.10.006

Kemmis, 2001, Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research: emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jürgen Habermas, 91

Kersbergen, 2004, ‘Governance’ as a bridge between disciplines: cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy, Eur. J. Political. Res., 43, 143, 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00149.x

Kloppenburg, 1991, Social theory and the de/reconstruction of agricultural science: local knowledge for an alternative agriculture, Rural Sociol., 56, 519, 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1991.tb00445.x

Leeuwis, 2000, Reconceptualising participation for sustainable rural development: towards a negotiation approach, Develop. Change, 31, 931, 10.1111/1467-7660.00184

Long, 2001, Demythologising planned intervention, 30

Long, 1994, The interweaving of knowledge and power in development Interfaces, 41

Marsden, 1998, Editorial: the shifting nature of rural governance and community participation, J. Rural Stud., 14, 1, 10.1016/S0743-0167(97)00042-9

Mayo, 2000

McPherson, 2003

Meadowcroft, 2004, Participation and sustainable development: modes of citizen, community and organisational involvement, 162

Paquet, 1999

Parson, 1995, Sustainable development as social learning: theoretical perspectives and practical challenges for the design of a research programme, 428

Phelps, 2000, Scratching the surface of collaborative and associative governance: identifying the diversity of social action in institutional capacity building, Environ. Plann. A, 32, 111, 10.1068/a31175

Platteau, 2002, Participatory development in the presence of endogenous community imperfections, J. Dev. Stud., 39, 104, 10.1080/00220380412331322771

Premchander, 2003, In Search of Water in Karnataka India—Degradation of Natural Resources and the Livelihood Crisis in Koppal District, Mount. Res. Dev., 23, 19, 10.1659/0276-4741(2003)023[0019:ISOWIK]2.0.CO;2

Purdon, 2003, The nature of ecosystem management: postmodernism and plurality in the sustainable management of the boreal forest, Environ. Sci. Policy, 6, 377, 10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00064-9

Rist, S., 2002. Si estamos de buen corazón, siempre hay producción—Caminos en la revalorización de formas de producción y de vida tradicional y su importancia para el desarrollo sostenible. Ediciones PLURAL—AGRUCO—CDE, La Paz.

Rist, 2003, The role of social learning processes in the emergence and development of Aymara land use systems, Mount. Res. Dev., 23, 263, 10.1659/0276-4741(2003)023[0263:TROSLP]2.0.CO;2

Rist, S., Zimmermann, A., Wiesmann, U., 2004. From epistemic monoculture to cooperation between epistemic communities—development research and sustainability. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Bridging Scales & Epistemologies, Alexandria, Egypt, 17–20 March 2004, Millennium Assessment, Washington, p. 21.

Robinson, 2004, Global crisis and Latin America, Bull. Latin Am. Res., 23, 135, 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2004.00100.x

Rose, 1992, political-power beyond the state—problematics of Government, Br. J. Sociol., 43, 173, 10.2307/591464

Scoon, 1994, Knowledge, power and agriculture—towards a theoretical understanding, 16

Tait, 2000, The politics of communication between planning officers and politicians: the exercise of power through discourse, Environ. Plann. A, 32, 489, 10.1068/a3287

2002

Vorley, 2002

Webler, 2000, Fairness and competence in citizen participation—theoretical reflections from a case study, Admin. Soc., 32, 566, 10.1177/00953990022019588

Wiesmann, 2005, Between conservation and development: pathways to management of the first World natural heritage site in the Alps by means of participatory processes, Mount. Res. Dev., 25, 128, 10.1659/0276-4741(2005)025[0128:BCAD]2.0.CO;2

Woodhill, 2000, The second wing of the eagle: the human dimension in learning our way to more sustainable futures, 46

Wu, 2004, Social connectedness in marginal rural China: the case of farmer innovation circles in Zhidan, north Shaanxi, Agri. Hum. Values, 21, 81, 10.1023/B:AHUM.0000014025.47576.72